Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

London

Rwanda or allowed to stay

5 replies

GoldBae · 16/08/2026 16:33

There is a housing crisis, it is a scramble for social housing. Should the labour party of scrapped the rwanda answer to immigration crisis and the housing crisis or should they bring back the rwanda option for if you get your stay then it is rwanda or if you do not want to live in rwanda then you can choose to go to your home of birth? What do you think. I am speechless and without an opinion.

OP posts:
ApolloandDaphne · 16/08/2026 16:54

It was unlawful, unsafe and costly therefore, quite rightly scrapped. There is no way anything like this should even be considered.

blacksax · 16/08/2026 16:54

Do the good citizens of the Republic of Rwanda get a say in this, or what?

BIWI · 16/08/2026 17:35

Is English not your first language?

This is nonsense:

I am speechless and without an opinion.

... because clearly you do have an opinion!

And yes, Labour should have scrapped it. It was unworkable and massively expensive.

qkhq · 16/08/2026 17:42

Chatgpt told me that Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, was safer than London.

As a country, we are overwhelmed in every area. Health service, jobs, basic services, everything. We shouldn't be taking more and more people who need help because we can't even help ourselves. We have people dying in hospital corridors and we wait 4, 5, 6, 7, 8+ hours in A&E. We should be taking people who come here legally and who are going to be net contributors (although why they would want to come here is beyond me).

And the fact that the people coming illegally are vast majority male is also worrying.

So I do think the Rwanda plan was alright given the circumstances.

JehovasFitness · 16/08/2026 18:00

£700 million for four people “deported” (who basically agreed to go). Mental.

This being considered and implemented was a sign that we ceased to be a serious country.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page