I'm writing to inform you that Rutherford House School is currently going against parents wishes by locating a controversial mobile mast on top of the school building for a fee.
Many of the Parents are outraged but it has created a divide between those who support it and those that do not. It would seem the school is defiant on having the mast for the sum of £14k per year. Parents forced through a consultation but it would appear that The Bellevue Group Trust (who can no longer be trusted) are quite some way with the lease negotiation.
Parents are supposed to vote on their childrens health in a forthcoming vote. If they force parents that do not want a mast that emits radiation, what should they do? Surely they should make the school liable? Isn't decision making like this unethical ? Is that what we should come to expect from free schools - wealth before health? Is money too tight to mention?
Mobile masts are very controversial due to the negative health impact on minors. The Stewert Report clearly recommends not placing them within close proximity of hospitals and schools! The big guns i.e.T Mobile/ Orange are insisting its safe focusing on the thermal impact and cherry picking parts of the report that suits them, which is subterfuge, as the real impact is biological and they admit that more research is needed and whilst they cannot find an established link as yet, they strongly advise caution.
Research shows that the cumulative impact of exposure affects and alters the DNA structure causing a host of problems. Scandinavian countries such as Sweden and Norway, Italy and others have got it together and said thanks but no thanks - choosing not to locate them near to schools!
Unfortunately the World Health Organisation and the government have too much too lose by making restrictions tighter and therefore we have a big problem. Personally I cannot fathom why anyone would take this type of risk with their child - if we cannot be sure - surely it's a logical decision. Isn't it? If the school is do proud of their actions should they be transparent and tell all prospective parents???