Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

WWYD, bad advice from Architect

79 replies

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · 09/09/2026 14:06

What would you do in this situation, I will be as brief as possible.

I was diagnosed with MS in 2023, and it was obviously very upsetting and a difficult time. I was admitted to hospital for a week and then stayed with my mum because I was too tired to get up the stairs etc. and her house was more suitable.
DH and I had discussed getting a small extension before this started. In my absence DH discussed with an architect who was recommended to him and went ahead with drawing plans and submitting to planning. With hindsight this was a scam, and DH was naive in trusting him. I was very unwell and unable to fully understand what was going on.
The plan was rejected by planning, changed slightly and rejected again.
I then made a recovery and stabilised. I contacted a local architect I know who spent a lot of time studying the local plan and history of our house. He spoke to the planning dept and tweaked the plans. They passed, we have the permission and are starting the work next week.
I can see very clearly that the 1st architect was either very bad at his job or a scammer. The work proposed had no fit with the local plan and was far too big. The revised plan was no better.
The new architect has also shown us that the drawings the original architect did are incorrect by up to 10cm in places.
I have written to him and been fobbed off. The original architect's work cost £4000. I am considering taking him to small claims court and wanted advice on whether there was any value in doing this? I feel very upset we were ripped off at such a vulnerable time and do not want him to carry on doing this to other people.
Thanks for any advice you can give.

OP posts:
FeelingOldOldOld · 16/09/2026 10:07

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 10/09/2026 21:01

To be called an Architect you must register with the ARB. This requires Part 1,2 and 3 exams PLUS 2 years practical experience. Architects then join RIBA (the professional body) as a Chartered Architect. So it’s pretty straightforward. Either they have this training and experience, or they don’t.

It’s very difficult to sue based on misrepresentation because the work was done. If it was too big, then the op and dh did need to look at the plans before they were submitted. This is a normal procedure: client and “architect” or architectural technician work together. A very simple extension doesn’t need an architect but misrepresentation really hinges on his headed notepaper and invoices. If it says “architectural services” then he’s not posing as an architect. Someone calling him an architect and recommending him, is not him using the term architect incorrectly.

Engineering has exactly the same issues. Graduate engineers cannot be bothered to get Chartered because it requires a high educational standard (masters) and years of practical experience but do you want someone without this rigorous training designing the steel structure for a skyscraper? Probably not. Always check people are who they say they are.

Edited

Just hopping on to say that to be a qualified Architect you need to do your part 3 RIBA exam, and then you can register with ARB (Architects Registration Board). This means you are a fully qualified Architect, who is legally entitled to use the title ‘Architect’. So it is the registration with ARB that is the dividing line between an ‘Architect’ or an ‘architectural designer’.

It is optional to join the RIBA, and become a ‘Chartered’ Architect (rather than just be a ‘Registered’ one). Last time I checked (many years ago) it cost a lot of money per year to join the RIBA. Which is fine if you make use of the services that it offers, but isn’t (necessarily) if you don’t.

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · 17/09/2026 07:54

I forgot to update, the ARB are investigating him, I will not hear the outcome.

OP posts:
SulkingInTheCatio · 17/09/2026 09:13

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · 17/09/2026 07:54

I forgot to update, the ARB are investigating him, I will not hear the outcome.

Will they not even tell you if he’s an architect or not.

FeelingOldOldOld · 17/09/2026 13:27

SulkingInTheCatio · 17/09/2026 09:13

Will they not even tell you if he’s an architect or not.

If they are investigating, it suggests that he is not! (As they would know - they hold the register)

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread