Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Micheal Jackson Jurors change their minds!!!!

18 replies

Nbg · 09/08/2005 14:37

Just been on the news that 2 of them have changed their minds and think that he is guilty!

OP posts:
handlemecarefully · 09/08/2005 14:37

Well there's a surprise

Nbg · 09/08/2005 14:38

I can't believe they would come out and say that now!

OP posts:
handlemecarefully · 09/08/2005 14:39

Yes, what a shame for justice and the legal system that they didn't air their opinions more forcibly when discussing with the other jurors!

WigWamBam · 09/08/2005 14:40

I quite agree, hmc.

Nbg · 09/08/2005 14:41

I wonder if they always thought that but were out numbered by the other jurors so kept quiet!

God I'd love to be a fly at times.

OP posts:
franke · 09/08/2005 14:42

Are these the same 2 who have signed book deals? Bit more exciting than "Why I think MJ is pure as the driven"

Nbg · 09/08/2005 14:43

It didn't say. It was just a small report on Radio 1.

OP posts:
Caligula · 09/08/2005 14:43

They must be tossers, quite frankly. I'm rather in the camp of "speak now or forever hold your peace" when it comes to things like this. If they thought he was guilty at the time, they should have said so. Unless new evidence has come to light, why should their opinions have changed since the trial?

franke · 09/08/2005 14:44

here

Nbg · 09/08/2005 14:48

So they did vote guilty to start then!

What a load of tripe about them all sticking together then and making a pact!

OP posts:
spursmum · 09/08/2005 14:48

According to the juror I heard about(who BTW has signed a book deal but "not for the money"!) She said that she thought he was guilty but there was a niggiling(sp?) doubt that the kid was lying and thats where "reasonable doubt" comes in.
As for the "not for the money" book deal...Yeah right!!

TinyGang · 09/08/2005 14:48

I can't believe that legally anyone is allowed to make money by writing a book / TV appearances about being on a jury and discussing the case. Can that be right?

munz · 09/08/2005 14:49

arn't they doing books?

Nbg · 09/08/2005 14:50

You would have thought so TG.

OP posts:
acnebride · 09/08/2005 14:54

Not allowed in the UK but in the US maybe the constitutional right to free specch trumps all?

I believe we should know more about jurors' deliberations, but making money out of it is another kettle of fish.

monkeytrousers · 09/08/2005 15:47

What a sad bunch. Poor kids.

donnie · 09/08/2005 15:52

is seems so obvious they are looking to make a fast buck - how pathetic.

monkeytrousers · 09/08/2005 15:55

Televising stuff like this will always bring out the worst in people. They get seduced by the possiblity of having their own 15 minutes. Integrity goes out of the window.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page