Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

In two minds about this one.............

11 replies

QueenOfQuotes · 27/07/2005 22:40

here

One the one hand I think what a complete waste of water, and not exactly what I'd call "art".

BUT, on the other hand if he used 800,000 litres of water in one month and Thames Valley Water pipes are leaking 915 MILLION litres a day.....and the amount of water that a lot of the general public waste maybe he was making a point?

OP posts:
Cam · 27/07/2005 23:17

It's not art

Caligula · 27/07/2005 23:33

What is art?

On that note, I'm orf to bed - good night!

monkeytrousers · 28/07/2005 10:31

stumped

QueenOfQuotes · 28/07/2005 10:32

Well yes I know it's not art, but interested behind his reasoning..

OP posts:
Hausfrau · 28/07/2005 10:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

snafu · 28/07/2005 10:33

Isn't this the same guy that pushed a peanut through London with his nose?

Gobbledigook · 28/07/2005 10:33

Art my arse

QueenOfQuotes · 28/07/2005 10:34

it was more the 'issue' behind his art I was wondering about, rather than his "art"...

OP posts:
SoupDragon · 28/07/2005 11:00

Of course, he could just have set the water up into a loop so it recycled itself.

QueenOfQuotes · 28/07/2005 11:02

he could but then I guess he was making a "point" about the 915 million litres lost each day to leakage in the Thames Valley Water area (hell that's a lot isn't it )

OP posts:
WigWamBam · 28/07/2005 11:05

Perhaps it will have drawn water wastage to public attention enough for people to try and do their bit to save water - and for the water companies to sit up and take notice.

Although I doubt it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page