MJ's wife's evidence

[monkeytrousers]

Can anyone tell me why her evidence was admissible even though she was fighting him for access to the children in another court? She was obviously over a barrel. My spider sense tells me that MJ is a bit of a nasty piece of work, whatever the verdict!

LOL at "spider sense"!!!!!

oh god ot another MIchael Jackson thread! cant the bloke retire in peace????

Hey, it's a valid question! I couldn't give a monkeys about The Childcatcher, I just wonder what kind of system would allow her evidence to be admissable.

I agree. I said at the time that it must be some kind of deal. Didn't the jurors think it a tad strange that she kept saying how wonderful he was, while at the same time fighting him because he won't let her see her own (?) kids?

sorry monkeytrousers i wasnt bieng mean its just ita all ive heard about on t.v and in the papers for ages i was hoping it would now be over!

I know Charlee, no worries.

Aloha - I read that they were her kids but not his as she was inseminated by annonymous doner. ???? Have to say I'm more swayed towards this. There's hardly a family resembmlence is there? God knows what kind of story they're going to tell in years to come...