Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
News
Original poster

Can someone go to the OK Magazine website

14 replies

inscotland · 30/06/2009 21:26

and tell me or post the link here (cos I can't do it) if that Michael Jackson picture is real. If it is what a sick thing to show and I am shocked at the magazine and won't be buying!

OP posts:
differentID · 30/06/2009 21:28

I believe it is real. It's disgusting that they actually bought the photo's in the first place. I saw it in Smiths yesterday.
I don't actually read those sort of mags and that's cemented my reasons why.

Original poster
inscotland · 30/06/2009 21:31

I am truly shocked that they would publish that.

OP posts:
IkeaHighchair · 30/06/2009 21:31

All I can see is photo's from 48hrs before he died. I don't see a problem with that?

OldLadyKnowsNothing · 30/06/2009 21:31

This one?

squeaver · 30/06/2009 21:32

I saw it in WH Smith today and couldn't quite believe it, tbh.

paddingtonbear1 · 30/06/2009 21:32

apparently it is real and they paid a lot of money. I won't be buying it either. The Jade goody tribute issue before she'd actually died was bad enough!

IkeaHighchair · 30/06/2009 21:32

Ok - didn't see that one.

Highly inappropriate anywhere in the mag let alone thrusting it in everyones faces onthe front cover.

wannaBe · 30/06/2009 21:59

What kind of people pay money to see that?

IkeaHighchair · 30/06/2009 22:02

My point is that you don't actually have to pay any money to have it thrust in your face - given that it is on the fornt cover.

I don't want to see it....and I certainly don't want DDs to see it.

wannaBe · 30/06/2009 22:04

that's very true. But if there weren't people paying money to read the rest of the shite that is printed within, then it wouldn't exist and it wouldn't be being thrust upon those of us who have no wish to see it.

tiredsville · 30/06/2009 23:12

precisely

HolyGuacamole · 30/06/2009 23:22

Disgraceful. How can they say it is a 'tribute' issue when clearly they are showing a really inappropriate photo that MJ (I would hazard a guess) would never have wanted shown. Surely a tribute issue should contain things that refer to a persons best moments, memories of good times and why they will be missed, rather than this sensational tripe that passes off as news.

Grrr.

Nancy66 · 01/07/2009 00:23

As MJ is going to have an open casket - i think i can guess what next week's cover will be.

Monkeyandbooba · 03/07/2009 19:30

I am utterly shocked at the cover, OK have hit an all time low. I for one will be writing a letter of complaint to teh Editor.

Is there anyone else that we can complain to? Who oversees standards in the press? Press Complaints Commission?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page