BURRELL - he is an utter wanker isnt he?

[DualCycloneCod]

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7280956.stm

oh FFS. need a roll eye smiley here.

eek, he turns my stomach

slimy little toad

Yes.

He is a wanker. But frankly, I would not blame anyone for not avoiding that particular media circus inquest.

he really is a nob end

i dont see why he gets away wiht it

He's probably stuck in the sauna

Yes, a complete nob

Am exasperated by this whole Diana thing, though

WHY WHY WHY do we need this inquest??

i read that as his nob stuck in the sauan

did they already have an inquest? did i miss something?

Such attention seeking behaviour [tut-tut emoticon]

cos the daily mail likes blondes who die

But he was hysterical in the jungle trial when he had to put his hands into the holes with unknown nasties in them.

he is vile

bleating on about being her "rock" and selling his tawdry books

being funny is NO EXCUSE

Doesn't stop him being an utter tosspot though

Boring

Don't care who was porking Lady Di. REALLY am not interested.

Am less interested in anything Paul Burrell has to say

oh i thought this was about that Razorlight singer, he's Borrell though isn't he - Another wanker!

lol oh no he was divine( see thread abotu posh birds)

but the whole court of windsor is a world of wank why should be be different.

he ethinks he's royalty in the states (doesn't he live there now?) and agree that he's v slimy eeeeeeeee

Burrell - oily tosspot
Borrell - pompous bonehead
Durrell - beardy zoologist (deceased)

Often wonder what colour the sky is on his home planet

Half most of the things that are coming out have no relevance to why/how she died and I wish they would just bloody stop it. As for Burrell he makes me feel ill and he should be made to go back to court. I feel sorry for his kids.

He is a complete moron.

So, he can't be compelled to return for further testimony since he is resident in America and therefore outside UK jurisdiction.....can/will anything happen to him when he next returns to the UK? Could he be arrested for contempt of court or anything else? Will he get away with giving incomplete/misleading evidence?