Anyone else doubting Lucy Letby's guilt?

[Nickersnackersnockers]

Don't know if I am allowed to share a link so please Google 'Science on Trial Lucy Letby'.

It's written by a scientist with no association to LL who is asking questions that were not addressed in court.

I am very disturbed by the article. Don't start slinging mud at me, make a large coffee, go read it, come back, and tell me what you think!

[LilKiks]

Absolutely not.

The letters she wrote, keepsakes and the fact that every unexplained and unexpected death/illness happened when she was attending says it all.

[mynameiscalypso]

I think if the points raised were valid considerations, her defence should have raised them at trial. The jury heard all the evidence, including the defence's evidence, and found her guilty.

[Anoushkaka]

I've had my doubts from the start.

[AnxiousPangolin]

Not another conspiracy nutter. How many more threads on this?

[rubyslippers]

No
she was on the ward for each and every baby death
that poor jury having sit through all the dreadful medical evidence of those babies dying
I have no idea why she’s becoming a cause celebre
the poor families who had to bury their children - this can only add to their terrible grief

[Drivingone]

No.

She was VERY good at covering her tracks; that doesn't make her less guilty, just more dangerous.

[LubaLuca]

No, there's no doubt. The defence used all they had, anything else can't be related to the case.

[Allofthisisasimulation]

I think there are people falling into the category of not wanting to believe someone in her position could possibly do that. Sadly they can, and they have.

[TruffleShuffles]

I find all this so unbelievably offensive to the families whose babies were murdered. Why does everything nowadays have to be a conspiracy?

[daliesque]

I think the evidence we have and how it was presented, shows she's guilty.

However, some of the things that were said about her manner and the apparent cold, clinical way she answered questions...well that's how I and most of my colleagues, both nurses and doctors, react so I don't think that im particular is sign of her being a psychopath....

[Ahwelltoobad]

NO.

[lifeturnsonadime]

No.

I believe that the criminal justice process produced the correct result. She had an exemplary defence which failed to produce defence witnesses, there is a reason for that!

I find it horrifying the number of people on these boards who think they could do better than Ben Myers KC!

[TheLightSideOfTheMoon]

Yes, I saw her looking shocked and sad and decided she was innocent.

Same with Brand.

This week I’ve decided to do something proper about my people pleasing. I fall for everyone playing the victim and believe what they’re saying/their innocence.

This has highlighted to me that my people pleasing isn’t just ridiculous. It’s actually dangerous.

If anyone has any advice/articles I would love to know about them.

[Eyesopenwideawake]

Is that you, Peter Hitchens??

[Maray1967]

Don’t be ridiculous- very clearly guilty. Present at every incident and parents testified about her leaning over the cots and doing stuff when they walked in as well as the comments she wrote. It would be hard to find a more clear cut case in my view.

For Gods sake stop adding to the poor families’ stress.

[Alltheprettyseahorses]

No, there is no doubt whatsoever that she is guilty. Your cited blog which, despite your appeal to authority in saying the author is a scientist*, is nothing more than the ignorant ramblings of a random nobody with no knowledge of the court case and, as you've said, no connection to it.

*scientist in which field anyway?

[Eileen101]

Not even slightly. If there was any weight to it, the defence experts would have been all over it.

[Totalwasteofpaper]

No. I still have no doubt...

The evidence at trial was compelling. She killed those children, god only knows why. They did not die of natural causes.

I don't know how the nurses and management involved in protecting her so should could continue unchecked can sleep at night.

[TigerRag]

Do you really think the police / CPS would have wasted all that time and resources investigating? The trial took 10 months - clearly gathered a lot of evidence from their investigations.

[FormerlyPathologicallyHappy]

Isn’t Peter Hitchens dead?

[Iguanas369]

Absolutely not.

[Colinorpercy]

I think unless you/‘the scientist’ have also heard the full raft of evidence from the trial you cannot make an informed decision on whether the her guilt is in doubt. I trust the jury’s decision who sat through it all.

[FormerlyPathologicallyHappy]

Oh my mistake Christopher Hitchens died.

[Hungrycaterpillarsmummy]

Lol NOPE. She's guilty as hell

[Eyesopenwideawake]

@FormerlyPathologicallyHappy

Isn’t Peter Hitchens dead?

Possibly, but that's unlikely to stop him writing bilge in the DM.