Gagging order businessman - How do I find out who it is?!

[PIPERHELLO]

Any of you know where on the internet I can find his name... ?! I'm intrigued & feel the judge's decision was way off on this one.

www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/06/millionaire-businessman-granted-secrecy-over-sexual-harassment-claims

From what the Times did give away it seemed to be an older , often married man with adult children , in poor health ...which brought to mind their owner Rupert Murdoch ! They wouldn't gun for him would they ?!
Would love to know ..did wonder about Beardy , he must have had to pay off dozens of women over the years because of his gropiness and shenanigans

I’d love to know too. The report in the Times said he’s a business man with strong political and society connections. Married more than once. Adult children. Properties uk and abroad I felt they gave as many clues as possible but I still can’t work it out.
I didn’t know the ‘chaste ‘ one had a dodgy rep ??

They are the only two businessmen a large proportion of the general public know of. Therefore they get mentioned all over the place. Last time it wasn’t either of them ...

I thought the chaste one has dementia so I guess if it is him that will be why?

Wtf is a dick pickle?

Think of brands of relish/pickle . . .

These threads are not fair.

Planes trains and automobiles

Sugar has said not him. Can’t be green wasn’t it him last time? Virgin, no idea if is him

Zombie ish thread but The Times are running this again with allegations of rape...disgraceful of the judge who decreed that the public wouldn't be able to distinguish between allegation and proof therefore allowed the secrecy orders. Without making this thread at risk ..where would one look to find out who this is ?

disgraceful of the judge who decreed that the public wouldn't be able to distinguish between allegation and proof therefore allowed the secrecy orders.

Well if the judge reads Mumsnet, they will know a lot of people refuse to distinguish between allegation and proof.