Can someone interpret this article for me please?

[Janh]

I have no idea what he's on about!

Is it me? (Probably is! )

My favourite line from the Old Testament is '"and the Lord slew Onan for he did a detestable thing" - completely irrelevant to the conversation, but after half a bottle of wine, who cares?

what a crappy writer.
and they paid him? fgs..

He's quite funny sometimes.
My ds2, 9m, looks disturbingly like him.
He's one of those people that I find myself fancying despite myself, iykwim.

Actually i really have drunk too much now haven't I?

hic badelaide

I have always thought he is an idiot, and this has certainly done nothing to change my opinion.

Why do so many writers nowadays write these meandering sentences that you have to read 3 or 4 times in order to get the meaning? Do they think it makes them seem clever? Well, I'm here to tell them it doesn't.

onanistic - have to look that up

agree bizarre article bizarre in the extreme - there was no point. why write that shit? what was the point? the only point seemingly to be made was that he was a childless bitter twisted fuck who sees no joy in children and think that most parents feel the same.

most parents are fuckwits - he concludes - let us non parents take the parenting classes

to what end?

i actually agree that society needs some kind of compulsory parenting classes for all.
my reasoning is that it will set a standard fro all to follow - a standard - like a 'good parent' propaganda fro the country.

but he thinks parenting classes are wasted on parents - and i dont get why.

and wtf has the elephant and his fucking aunt got to do with fuck all.

shame really, becuase i thought his writing was good.