Yes I saw that: "Mail did not reveal to PCC or Leveson that News of the World hacked staff"
So while the PCC was supporting NOTW's "couple of rogue reporters" story and attacking The Guardian for suggesting otherwise, the Mail on Sunday editor was sitting on the PCC committee knowing the rogue reporter shit was almost certainly untrue.
Each trial is revealing a little more, isn't it? And it's all public domain: so much for all those privately settled civil and employment cases with their gagging clauses.