Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Those bigoted dicks with the dingy guest house have lost their case again

8 replies

Greensleeves · 27/11/2013 18:41

Still fighting talk though - where will they go next I wonder? Can't see the European Court of Human Rights giving them any joy.

Or maybe they will have a Damascene moment and realise that they are in fact wrong?

Tossers.

OP posts:
NiceTabard · 27/11/2013 18:44

Couldn't agree more.

Miserable pair of bastards.

I liked what Stonewall said:

"We are pleased that the Supreme Court has defended the laws protecting gay customers that Stonewall fought so hard to secure. Some might suggest that, rather than pursuing this case, a far more Christian thing to do would be to fight the evils of poverty and disease worldwide."

Heh.

GobbySadcase · 27/11/2013 18:46

Your last sentence? Not a snowball's chance in Hell.
Love the title Grin

Greensleeves · 27/11/2013 18:47

They and their chintzy beige curtains need to fuck off back to the 1950s where they belong

OP posts:
Greensleeves · 27/11/2013 18:49

Yes great comment from Stonewall!

Something tells me though that Mr and Mrs Bull do not cultivate a keen interest in the welfare of the poor and hungry of the world. She would slam the door in the face of the Virgin Mary, no room at the inn you dirty unmarried harlot Grin

OP posts:
BigArea · 27/11/2013 18:55

Completely agree

VerySmallSqueak · 27/11/2013 18:57

I am presuming that at some point they will lack the funds to do anything else,even if they could.

Nasty intolerance hiding behind religion.

pointyfangs · 27/11/2013 19:28

Squeak if the so-called Christian Institute thinks there's mileage in it, they will keep bankrolling more court cases for these two and people like them.

Glad they lost though, and Baroness Hale's judgement is a joy to read.

MrsTerryPratchett · 29/11/2013 23:50

Someone on another thread ages ago was saying that these men targeted them and shouldn't have. I was livid about it and realised it IS tantamount to saying that Rosa Parks had a seat at the back of the bus she could have used and why on earth would she sit at the front?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page