A slight overreaction by the author???
Sky News in soft porn pic outrage
I'm all for protecting kids from smut and porn and the like, but I think this is a bit over the top. I'm aware that various faiths/believes/attitudes prefer being covered up and aren't as liberal as we, The MrsBigD household, are but surely it's a matter of context/content when it comes to pictures of people in the nude?
I've had a look through the pictures and don't find any particulary offensive or pornographic, and believe me I'm not a fan of porn... don't see the point of it
Also if I remember correctly a few years back there was some piece of art being made out of naked people...?
Just my 2p worth