Good grief. Who the hell thought this was appropriate? And didn't it occur to them the owners and other visitors might object?
And most importantly, why the hell is a sex offender allowed access to a child? She may be his child but she deserves the same protection we'd give anybody else. More so as she's clearly an easy target for him.
What on earth are courts teaching children? 'You are forced into contact with a sex offender by the grown ups in charge of the law because it's your Dad.' Great message. What do they think will happen to these children when they grow up and become parents - will they have learned a skewed attitude to sex offenders because at a tender age grown ups in authority said they MUST be in their company?