The business about her saying she would give the diamond/s to charity as soon as she received them seemed very, erm, generous.
Then the charity said they never received them.
Now the bloke from the charity says he did received them and has handed them over
where were they all this time?
If it's the same ones and he's handed them over then everyone will be able to see whether it's one big one or lots of little ones. By, yuo know, looking with their eyes. Unless one big one could get cut into lots of little ones?
it all seems very peculiar, and it was a long time ago. But both women have given evidence that diamonds changed hands, which is all the prosecution needs from them, I think?