Did anyone watch this? What did you think? I was so disappointed. I actually took the “Rob Rinder- serious criminal barrister professional sceptic” blurb seriously. But he never even raised the possibility that the “smoking gun” documents could be both authentic and contemporary, and still factually incorrect. No mention that people might get the facts wrong. Or lie out of fear or ambition or for any number of other reasons. Isn’t this basic?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Whether you're interested in Roman, military, British or art history, join our History forum to discuss your passion with other MNers.
History club
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.