Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
History club

Whether you're interested in Roman, military, British or art history, join our History forum to discuss your passion with other MNers.

Original poster

How far back can you trace your family tree?

73 replies

chocolatemad24 · 26/11/2016 22:41

After reading the thread about Danny Dyer on Who Do You Think You Are, it made me wonder how many people can actually trace their lineage back to Edward III. I have never traced my family, but would love to one day. Can any of you trace your family back to royalty or any historical figures?

OP posts:
timelytess · 26/11/2016 22:42

I went back through the census records and didn't take it any further. I got back, on dates of birth, to around 1800.

Flisspaps · 26/11/2016 22:45

DH and my mum have both managed to get back through Ancestry.co.uk to the 1600s!

PossumInAPearTree · 26/11/2016 22:47

I'm descended from Anne Askew who was the only woman to be tortured in the Tower of London I believe. She was burnt at the stake. She was a friend of one of Henry viii's wives.....maybe Catherine Parr and refused to name other protestants.

ghostspirit · 26/11/2016 22:49

I would love to trace back my family but I can't :(

PossumInAPearTree · 26/11/2016 22:49

On my dad's side I'm related to a poet called John Clare, who I'd never heard of and to be honest I don't think most people have. But google reckons he's one of the greatest English poets!

averylongtimeago · 26/11/2016 22:50

I have traced my mum's family back to 1450 on one line, my husband's back to 1700 but my dad has traced his side back to pre 1066 (a Norman knight). It is relatively easy to get back to about 1800 by using the census records, before then you are relying on parish records mostly, luckily more and more are on line.

IrenetheQuaint · 26/11/2016 22:51

Yes, I can trace mine back to Edward III (assuming the family tree my grandfather put together is right!). The relevant branch of the family were landowners in a small way which makes things much easier to trace.

FernetBranca · 26/11/2016 22:52

John Clare was a fabulous poet. I studied him at Oxford - respect for being related to him

My ancestors on one side had one of the country's most common names - it's really hard to trace and three generations back they were signing things with an X so not much joy.

kiwipie · 26/11/2016 22:54

1500, on my mothers side.

Dizzybintess · 26/11/2016 22:55

I have gont back to 1415 on one side of my tree

PossumInAPearTree · 26/11/2016 22:55

fernet. Must admit Ive never read any of his poetry. I keep meaning to go on a visit to Clare Cottage which looks like a little museum to him. I don't live too far away so will make a priority after Xmas to go.

FlouncingInAWinterWonderland · 26/11/2016 22:56

Inca royalty, french aristocrats, Irish 'characters' and English ecentrics in my lineage.

RueDeWakening · 26/11/2016 23:00

I can trace my mums family back to about 1760, but haven't got further.

We're related to some well known painters of pottery, not that I'd ever heard of them. And a one-armed station master on the railways. And my many-greats grandfather, who was an ag lab and who died "falling over a stile, drunk".

NannyR · 26/11/2016 23:01

I've got back as far as 1790 (reliably, with sources that I've double checked in record offices).
To be honest, I'm not that bothered about tracing my line back to centuries old historical ancestors - when you look at how many thousands of descendants they have and what a tiny, tiny percentage of DNA you would share. I tend to take my research sideways, as well as finding birth, death and marriage dates, I also look at school and employment records, where they lived, sometimes criminal records, newspaper articles, immigration records, stuff like that to build up a fuller picture of my ancestors lives.

CondensedMilkSarnies · 26/11/2016 23:03

We go back to 1545ish to the chap that arrested Guy Fawkes

divineinterruption · 26/11/2016 23:05

some people on both sides of my family have done research and have traced family back to about 1700s. in my DH's family they traced the roots to about 1400s/1500s. but looking at the family tree, in the 1400s/1500s up to about 1700s, everyone had pretty much the same name so not sure how reliable it is....

SaagMasala · 27/11/2016 10:19

I'm related to Danny Dyer on my dad's side! Haven't counted up but it must be at least 10th cousins!

That line taps into the English monarchy so it goes back as far as you can be bothered.

Not got so far back on the others, some resolutely stuck in the late 1700's/early 1800's due to lack of information in areas where there are several families with the same surname, or the families tended to move between villages for work every couple of years.

Most parish records started in 1660, though some have been lost, and some started earlier. You need other records such as land leases or Wills to be able to confirm the details. So if your ancestors were poor, law-abiding, hardworking folk there's not usually much of a paper trail.

olderthanyouthink · 27/11/2016 10:43

I'm sure my mums family is traceable a fair way back, that's the white/English side of my heritage.

But my dads side probably not further than anyone can remember, this would be the black side of my heritage. Records were kept of spaces but they burned years ago Sad so I doubt we could figure out who were the first ones, who owned them, the ship that they were taken on etc. I imagine the county they were taken from could be figured out using DNA.

Dizzybintess · 27/11/2016 11:30

My 1400 relatives are the Killick family. I'm welsh but my ancestors are English and hail from tenterden in Kent

OdinsLoveChild · 27/11/2016 11:45

The late 1200's. One of my ancestors came over to England with the King Phillipe of France as his wine merchant. The King went back to France and refused to pay my Ancestor for the wine he and his court had consumed on their trip to England and they couldn't afford to return so were stuck here.

I have copies of Petitions from my ancestor to the French King asking for payment or a return trip but it was refused. He also Petitioned the English King Edward about the situation who granted him permission to stay in England but I don't know if he ever got his money. Im guessing not as he clearly stayed in England.

GiddyOnZackHunt · 27/11/2016 11:57

DH's intersects with royalty in a number of places most recently about 300 years ago. We can obviously trace his line pretty easily back to Edward III. His non royal lines I can trace to about 1700 except for one which runs into a dead end at 1870.
I can get back to the 1500s in some places but other parts run into the Irish Famine with common Irish names that have meant I can get no further.

Mynameismummy37 · 27/11/2016 11:58

It's sad isn't older?
I've just only been able to go back 3 generations on my dads side and I already knew about those, although I did find out my Gran had two other children before she came to England, sadly one was stillborn and the other died at 5 days old.

Original poster
chocolatemad24 · 27/11/2016 12:01

Lots of interesting stories here Smile

OP posts:
dodobookends · 27/11/2016 12:02

I've got back to the early 1700's on one side, but stuck on the other in the early 1800's. It helps if anyone on your tree has a connection with royalty/gentry as their pedigrees have already been done so you can get back a lot further, but no luck in our case!

lljkk · 27/11/2016 12:02

If you can confirm English aristocracy in your line, then in theory you go back to William the Conquerer, although tracing the whole line may be impossible.

That I'm very sure about, I can go to about 1565 for me. Early 1700s for DH.