Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Pretty shocked at this

7 replies

Eveningdusk · 31/10/2017 07:08

Since when could a teacher groom and have sex with a student and still theoretically go on to teach again in the future?

OP posts:
Fluffysparks · 31/10/2017 07:39

Examples...?

PurpleDaisies · 31/10/2017 07:41

More information needed.

DumbledoresApprentice · 31/10/2017 07:43

Is this a case in the news? If so I haven’t heard about it. Have you got a link?

Eveningdusk · 31/10/2017 07:46

here it is

She could be teaching again in five years Angry

OP posts:
AllPowerfulLizardPerson · 31/10/2017 07:51

I think this is because if the HRS, under which you cannot have a fixed penalty for life (unless judge rules in in exception cases such as aggravated murders with a while life tariff). Everyone else has a right to have their sentence reviewed eg for parole and length of time on SRO.

It does not mean that people who are still considered a threat will be allowed back at the first legally available review point.

Eveningdusk · 31/10/2017 07:55

No, its not a criminal court.

She should have been barred from teaching for life.

OP posts:
DumbledoresApprentice · 31/10/2017 17:39

I agree. I think a lifetime ban would have been more appropriate. For sexual misconduct of this degree a lifetime ban would normally be the penalty so I’m surprised that they’ve set a review. They won’t necessarily be allowed to teach again in 5 years but I don’t see why there is any reason to allow a review at all in a case this serious.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread