Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

An alternative perspective

27 replies

havefunpeleton · 05/07/2020 22:09

If at the last election. A political party had said they'd save 60 k deaths. However this would cost us 100 billion. And our kids and grandkids would have to repay this debt. And the majority of people 'saved' would die within a year. And btw we'd have to lockdown for months... and there would be huge unemployment. Schools would close too. I'm guessing this wouldn't have been a vote winner!!

If however a party promised to cut taxes (and therefore cut nhs spending) they'd have been pretty popular

We have been utterly brainwashed haven't we?

OP posts:
MereDintofPandiculation · 06/07/2020 18:54

And the majority of people 'saved' would die within a year The figure I saw was that the estimated remaining life expectancy of those who died was 13 years. Unless those who were saved were on average considerably older or considerably more unwell than those who died, it is unlikely that "the majority of those saved would die within the year".

iffymiffy · 06/07/2020 19:05

I’m vulnerable to coronavirus and I’m 39. I intend to live longer than 13 more years.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.