Dr Calderwood was spectacularly stupid but in the context of knowing that senior politicians are doing it too perhaps it didn't seem so at the time?
Did a journalist pick on a female target deliberately, when there are plenty of others, as has been suggested? Or did he/she learn that the CMO was the only one flouting her own rules, or one of many but perhaps the most important, as they are her rules?
Matt Hancock and Jenny Harries were asked yesterday if they have second homes they have visited during the crisis. Hancock ended the press conference at that point and neither answered the question. Because he was trying not to get involved in a Scotish matter or because he was scared of the answer? I'd expect politicians of all colours will be facing that question in the coming days.
Was the journalist wrong to follow her and her family or doing exactly what journalists should do by holding these people to account?