Pre-eclampsia - did it cause you to have a fast labour

[Flum]

I had pre-eclampsia in my first pregnancy and then had a spntaneous but fast (3 hours to full dilation) labour. (Ended up in emergency c/s btw)

A midwife told me today that the fast labour was probably due to the pre-eclampsia. She said that the body is stressed when pre-eclamptic and when stressed it labours fast in order to try to 'expel' the baby as fast as possible.

Has anyone heard this before? Had this?

Induced because of pre eclampsia. 2 and a half hours- first baby. Cos induced don't know if it truly counts. Never heard your mw explanation before

Not for me! had pre-eclampsia with DD , tried to induce me for 3 days on a drip for 9 hours gel the lot nothing not one single little contraction !! they had to do a c-section in the end as she was not budging at all......

I had high blood pressure (was never actaully diagnosed as pre-eclampsia), was induced because of it - took ages to get going (3 lots of gel), had syntocinon drip as well - but when it did finally get going went from 4cm to fully dialted in about 3/4 of an hour (having just been told it would take another 6 hours and begged for an epidural !).

mmmm just found this again. still interested as my second babe I had a very long labour with: 20 hours compared with 3 hours first one. Did have epidural though.

didn't have much oedema with 2nd and was not pre-eclamptic. Now 36 weeks with third baby and got shocking oedema and carpal tunnel, wonder if could be pre-eclamptic again.

Yes, I had 2 x quick labours & pre-eclampsia both times.

First labour was induced - 2.5 hours start to finish. Second labour, induction booked but went into labour naturally 2 days before induction was due to take place. Also very quick - about 3 hours start to finish.

My consultant also said the high blood pressure / pre-eclampsia often led to fast labours. Hope everything goes ok for you x

No. I had pre-eclampsia with a 100 hour labour ending in an emergency c-section.