Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Childbirth

Share experiences and get support around labour, birth and recovery.

Any coincidence between having Braxton Hicks and a quick labour?

9 replies

BoysBoysBoysAndMe · 21/10/2012 22:01

Just that really.

Had no bh with two previous pregnancies.

Getting lots of bh, regularly and quite strong this time.

I'm 38 + 4 now. Both labours previous were 26 and 38 hours long.

Bh mean a quicker labour??

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
ellangirl · 21/10/2012 22:06

Difficult to quantify I should think. Apparently everyone gets bh but just doesn't notice. Having said that I had loads last time (and this time) from 14 weeks ish. First labour was 8 hours from start to finish. I'll let you know about the second Grin

WhispersOfWickedness · 21/10/2012 22:08

Not sure. I had loads with last pregnancy and labour was 2.5 hours! But I had quite a few with first pregnancy too and labour was 25 hours, so possibly just coincidence!

PoisonMountain · 22/10/2012 10:20

Don't think there's a link. I had none that I noticed with DS, birth about 4.5 hrs. I had two with dd (I got all excited that I had bh!) and then real contractions started and she arrived 50 mins later.

MrsBungleBear · 22/10/2012 10:25

I didn't notice any at all in first pregnancy. Labour was 52 hours.

Second pregnancy I had really strong ones very often from about 30 weeks. Second labour was 1 hour 54 minutes.

Might be a coincidence though!

BoysBoysBoysAndMe · 22/10/2012 10:37

How did you find the quick labour mrsBungle?

Did you prefer the long or short one?

OP posts:
PiggyMad · 22/10/2012 22:18

I did have a few from about 18-20 weeks onwards, but they didn't ever get strong or 'noticeable' and I had a 5 hour first labour. So I'm not sure - it is probably quite personal and depends on your body.
Fingers crossed for a speedy delivery OP!

MrsBungleBear · 23/10/2012 14:05

Boys My quick labour was about 5 million times better and easier than my long one!

Long one was more painful and exhausting whereas the short one was over in a flash and not nearly as painful.

Hope you get a nice short one this time!

Plunkett · 23/10/2012 22:34

Lots of BH with ds - and 1 & 1/2 hour labour (although waters broke few hours before).
Now on pg 2 and having even more and stronger BH, so hoping no pattern - would at least like long enough to get to a hospital. :)

Chunkychicken · 24/10/2012 08:55

I'm watching with interest... Currently 36wks with #2 and keep getting BH, not painful but fairly definite bump hardenings. I don't recall having any tightenings or pains with DD, and although it was 12hrs from show to baby, active labour was very quick (I went from 1cm dilated to 9cm & waters gone in maybe 2 or 3 hours, but can't say for certain, as wasn't in hospital between exams iyswim...) It would be interesting to see if 2nd labours are quicker! Thank goodness I'm hoping for a homebirth. :)

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread