in thinking that the journalists who post on here

[Jux]

could be a bit more original, interesting, witty and less thin-skinned?

Oh, yes I am.

Who?

Who ? I am rubbish at spotting journalists

Fuck off.

I assume she means you then pikelit?

In this instance I am not guilty!

eh?

PS. Message was eaten before final sentence...

...But us Feral Beasts have to show some sort of thin-skinned solidarity.

How polite pike

Second time today I have spotted a very rude journo on MN

Links please.

I'm regretting this already. So I'm off to watch the second part of Silent Witness and find out why the Coroner's Officer is poisoning people.

You could go further, and argue that most journalists would benefit from being a bit more witty, interesting and original.

Oh, except David Mitchell in the Observer.

He's not strictly a journo though, he's a columnist . Who's being thin-skinned then?

Sorry, lost this thread in mish mash of RL and Mac problems, and it's old hat now, but in case anyone's interested I was knee-jerk reacting to this thread.

faint (and apologetic)

Is it wrong to have a crush on David Mitchell?

ARF.

You're all fucking bitches.

hahahahahaha

Not at all, CommonNortherner. It is the only logical position to take.