A new colleague, Martin, joined our team about six weeks ago. He has occasionally referenced his partner, Steph, in conversation.
Today over lunch one of the team was moaning about how her husband doesn’t get how her MIL is sticking her nose in all the time. Martin said, “I know, Steph’s the same. His mum drives me mad, but he thinks she can do no wrong”.
I was taken aback and couldn’t help saying “He?” out loud. Martin looked a bit confused, then laughed and said, “Oh, you thought Steph was a woman! No, Stef - short for Stefan.” I apologised for assuming, he said it was fine; it had happened before. Then the conversation just went on as normal.
Anyway, later one of my colleagues, Shannon, said to me and nightmare MIL colleague that it was “really weird” that Martin had “lied to us”. I was a bit confused; I said he hadn’t lied, but we’d just assumed his partner was a woman, and now we knew we were wrong. Just a simple misunderstanding. Shannon was digging her heels in and said Martin must have deliberately tried to avoid saying “he” and why had he done it? My other colleague pointed out that, if he was trying to hide a male partner for some reason, he wasn’t trying very hard, given he’d openly referred to him as “he”.
She asked Shannon if she had a problem with Martin being gay, given she was making a thing of it. She said of course not, but she didn’t like “being lied to”.
We were flummoxed. As far as were both concerned, Martin hadn’t lied; he’d assumed we knew Stef was a man, we assumed he was a woman, and now we know different. I was initially worried he might be offended, but there’s no sign of that. So why is it such a big thing for Shannon? My other colleague wondered if she fancied Martin and is annoyed he’s unavailable, but even when she thought he was straight, he had a partner, so was always off-limits.
It’s not just me, is it? This is bizarre, right?