I already know it seems unreasonable, even to me. But it is the situation I am in.
To add context, I was recently hired to a position within a company I have worked in for a few years. This position is in the same industry as my previous position and a much more specific department. I guess you could liken it to always being a diabetes nurse, who is now a supervisor in a mental health clinic. Both health, both nursing but specifics are very different.
This position legally requires a mandatory qualification, which I am studying towards (since being appointed, so still early days ).
There is a member of staff who holds this qualification already, and does the job free lance elsewhere, but didn't apply for this position. So there is no animosity or unfairness in that regard. She didn't want the job.
Here is where it is tricky...this job comes with a lot a legal frameworks, statutory timescales and meetings with clients.
I obviously am trying my best to learn and follow these, and my management team have told me to seek support from my Co worker as she knows it all.
On the other side, she has said to me ' feel free to ask if there is anything you need, but I am cautious of undermining you so won't get involved unless you ask'.
Which puts me on a position of having to reach out and ask, knowing she is more qualified and paid less. I mentioned this to management whose view was ' she's our employee, we are allowed to utilise her skills as we choose'.
There is A LOT I need to ask, and do when I have no other choice, but then I also have to manage her as her line manager and direct her in her actual job.
What is the general consensus here? Should I have not taken the job, even though I was reassured I would be supported?