Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think banning fried eggs is a step too far?

299 replies

NameChanger2026 · 13/09/2026 23:24

Whilst I agree with most of this, what’s wrong with an egg in decent oil?

To think banning fried eggs is a step too far?
OP posts:
BadBadCat · Yesterday 09:43

Nothing wrong with a fried egg! Nothing wrong with oil! Eggs don't absorb oil so it's one of the best ways to cook them.

I thought we had moved away from the idea that a low fat diet is the healthiest?

Why can't we just feed children a diet full of unprocessed home-cooked food?

In the 70s and 80s we ate pudding every day at school and after tea at home as well and it didn't make us overweight. It was home-made so not ultra-processed. We didn't snack between meals because we had, had our sweet treat with our meal. We were only allowed sweets or crisps on Friday after school when we got our pocket money. There wasn't any processed snacks in the cupboards at home- there was fruit or bread if we were hungry after school and milk to drink.

The way many children eat at home now is completely wrong, that is the problem, not school dinners.

The school I work in supplies healthy school meals and children won't eat them! They want plain pasta, chips, sausages, chicken nuggets, etc as opposed to the vegetable lasagne, carrots and broccoli, roast dinners etc. that they are offered.
Most bring a packed lunch containing crisps, chocolate biscuits and sugary processed yoghurts instead. Their parents pack them far too much for their age- there is a fear of children being hungry these days so when children shun fruit and vegetables like young children naturally do they are not encouraged to eat them, they are replaced with things parents are confident their children will eat. These are inevitably bland, starchy and processed foods, so children never learn to like fruit and veg or foods with diverse textures and flavours so we are ending up with a generation of children with limited diets.

ANNotherWriter · Yesterday 09:45

Not so say there is masses of work to do with the education system but the shocking stats on childhood obesity for kids in Year 6 (and adults) is condemning them to a lifetime of ill health.
So it's not a bad idea to try to make changes, is it?

SuperSharpShooter · Yesterday 09:46

Burford Buff in olive oil and butter 😅 ffs.

Tbf OP I think its kind of a moot point. Never ever known a school to do fried eggs anyway. Far too much faff and probably don't have the equipment. If anything they would be poach/baked in muffin like trays in the oven. (Or pre-made frozen omelette!)

Metalmotha · Yesterday 09:47

Well it’s all rather pointless- my son eats fairly healthy and does a lot of exercise. The food in the canteen now is just limited the kids are now all just bringing packed lunches.

Schools should be teaching kids moderation. It’s like these parents who ban chocolate, first chance a kid has they’re stuffing their faces with it.

it’s just going to turn kids off thinking about healthy food. There’s no education round it.

ANNotherWriter · Yesterday 09:47

Nothing wrong with a fried egg! Nothing wrong with oil! Eggs don't absorb oil so it's one of the best ways to cook them.
I thought we had moved away from the idea that a low fat diet is the healthiest?

It's not about fat it's about frying- and there is a difference.
Healthy fat are good. Frying changes the food a lot.

The idea is to avoid fried foods per se in school, so it's easier just to say no fried foods.

I can't see how eggs fried for mass consumption are actually very nice- they need cooking and eating straight away.

Kirbert2 · Yesterday 09:48

Metalmotha · Yesterday 09:47

Well it’s all rather pointless- my son eats fairly healthy and does a lot of exercise. The food in the canteen now is just limited the kids are now all just bringing packed lunches.

Schools should be teaching kids moderation. It’s like these parents who ban chocolate, first chance a kid has they’re stuffing their faces with it.

it’s just going to turn kids off thinking about healthy food. There’s no education round it.

This was one of my first thoughts too. If kids don't eat the food, I imagine the parents will just switch to packed lunches instead.

GreyCarpet · Yesterday 09:48

MrsCarson · Yesterday 09:35

Hopefully not cutting good fats from diets of kids (or anyone) seeing that fat is needed for Brain function and Brain Health.
The stuff that needs to be cut is the rubbish oils that are added to so much food. Olive oil, butter and natural fat in milk, cheese and yoghurt your body can actually use is what we need.

Exactly.

Your brain needs fat. It is composed of fat and water. Around 25% of the brain's dry matter (fat) is cholesterol. Cholesterol is necessary for speedy brain signals and neurotransmitters such as dopamine and serotonin to cross synapses effectively.

GregKay · Yesterday 09:49

Fried eggs in oil are revolting that's what's wrong with them, slimy pukey little things, just thinking about them makes me wretch! 😀Scrambled is much nicer!

Natsku · Yesterday 09:49

Theunamedcat · Yesterday 09:24

When I was at school we were taught how to cook basic nutritional meals from scratch my children have not been taught this by the school they were supposed to make vegetable soup first ingredient tin of vegetable soup sliced bread for croutons basically they taught secondary school children how to open a tin of soup heat it up and make a few croutons then they had to bring it home in a tub

This is not helpful

Wow that's bad. Were they really limited for time or something? Doesn't teach them much at all! My DD does home ec in Finland and they are taught to make everything from scratch, each week they make several different things (in groups, so part of the group does some dishes and the rest does others) then eat them together in class. For instance if they make burgers they will make the bread from scratch as well as the patties.

GreyCarpet · Yesterday 09:49

ANNotherWriter · Yesterday 09:45

Not so say there is masses of work to do with the education system but the shocking stats on childhood obesity for kids in Year 6 (and adults) is condemning them to a lifetime of ill health.
So it's not a bad idea to try to make changes, is it?

Nothing wrong with making changes but they need to be the right changes.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 09:52

Another76543 · Yesterday 09:41

I’m just pleased that the government has clearly sorted out all the other problems with education (lack of teachers/behaviour/attainment etc) and now have time to turn their attention to how schools should cook eggs and telling them how many grams of ketchup they can serve……

England’s brilliant PISA performance seems to indicate pretty good progress on this…

Newname26 · Yesterday 09:53

Metalmotha · Yesterday 09:47

Well it’s all rather pointless- my son eats fairly healthy and does a lot of exercise. The food in the canteen now is just limited the kids are now all just bringing packed lunches.

Schools should be teaching kids moderation. It’s like these parents who ban chocolate, first chance a kid has they’re stuffing their faces with it.

it’s just going to turn kids off thinking about healthy food. There’s no education round it.

That's my experience too. He was often opting for the sandwich option (cheese or ham) rather than the cooked options.

We are now down to school lunches only on fish n chips day

Another76543 · Yesterday 09:53

captainfloaty · Yesterday 07:50

I think it's insane that public money is spent on providing school children with puddings after lunch. Who the fuck eats pudding after lunch any way? I don't know anyone in real life and surely it would be better to spend the money on a better quality main and not encourage kids to think this is normal. I mean you could give them a square of dark chocolate or something if absolutely necessary but you're more or less doubling the calorie content with some of the options you hear about and there's next to no nutritional value. Gosh, I sound like a pudding nazi but when funds are short surely this makes absolutely no sense!

Active growing children need lots of calories. These “experts” never seem to look at the bigger picture. They assume that we have an obesity problem because kids are eating dessert. Kids in the 1970s ate dessert and fried food. They weren’t obese. The problem now is that too many kids don’t do enough exercise (in or out of school), and are fed over processed rubbish. We need to get back to basics - get kids moving more and feed them a balanced diet made from proper fresh ingredients. It’s really not rocket science. Obsessing over how an egg is cooked is not the answer.

PensionPTake · Yesterday 09:55

I've never seen egg on our school menu anyway apart from scrambled for a brunch type lunch (I think our menu is awful btw). I don't think any kids are getting anything more than toast as a cooked food at breakfast club?

I'm somewhat confused though as I thought most schools did most if not all of this already? Ours haven't had deep fried food for years. Always have a veg with every main. Cakes were removed a couple of years ago and it's just fruit, yoghurt, jelly most days (although I think that was more cost cutting!) are schools actually serving deep fried foods and not putting veg with their mains???

PlantainArama · Yesterday 09:55

I wouldn't ban cakes or fried food.

But I do think kids ought to get used to eating big healthy vegetarian meals like curries and strews with brown rice. These are easy to scale up and also by far the cheapest way of delivering nutrition. Given they aren't allowed to serve nuts, schools ought to make wholegrains and pulses a completely normal part of meals.

Strawberryfruitstarburst · Yesterday 09:56

Another76543 · Yesterday 09:41

I’m just pleased that the government has clearly sorted out all the other problems with education (lack of teachers/behaviour/attainment etc) and now have time to turn their attention to how schools should cook eggs and telling them how many grams of ketchup they can serve……

That’s not just what they have done though is it so don’t sneer.

It’s about time food and nutrition was prioritised for us all and children. It’s the most important thing in the world in my opinion.

Sadcafe · Yesterday 09:57

Jamie Oliver was right starting the whole campaign for better school meals years ago, but there comes a point where you bring in stuff the kids just won’t eat. Totally for fruit rather than cakes, but lentils, really, how many kids will willingly eat them and yes I know they are in with other foods not served alone. It’s finding a balance that’s important

Metalmotha · Yesterday 09:58

Kirbert2 · Yesterday 09:48

This was one of my first thoughts too. If kids don't eat the food, I imagine the parents will just switch to packed lunches instead.

I look at it like this, even my 14 year old son who plays football 3 times per week MMA twice per week, goes to the gym, doing food tech gcse because he’s interested in getting good nutrition as he’s very interested in health and fitness, eats a wide variety of foods, snacks on fruit and salads, loves raw carrots is refusing these new “healthily” lunches as there’s nothing he likes (he will generally try most things but he knows what he likes and doesn’t). If he wants a slice of cake or portion of chips do be it. He’s just shy of 6ft and 10 stone with no excess fat on him. I would like him to have a hot meal at lunch esp in winter.

There should be an element of choice there with education around making those choices. This whole thing is utterly ridiculous.

Get kids moving more, make our streets and parks safer so kids can be out and about, subsidise sports clubs. Limit online activity for under 18s. Legislate against UPFs. Make life more affordable so families have the time and money to invest in decent meals.

boxtop · Yesterday 09:58

I've never seen a school that did fried eggs but it does do my nut in when people think a fried egg and a scrambled egg cooked in the same amount of butter or oil are somehow different nutritionally. Or a poached egg served on lettuce dressed in 1tbsp olive oil, for that matter.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 09:58

Another76543 · Yesterday 09:53

Active growing children need lots of calories. These “experts” never seem to look at the bigger picture. They assume that we have an obesity problem because kids are eating dessert. Kids in the 1970s ate dessert and fried food. They weren’t obese. The problem now is that too many kids don’t do enough exercise (in or out of school), and are fed over processed rubbish. We need to get back to basics - get kids moving more and feed them a balanced diet made from proper fresh ingredients. It’s really not rocket science. Obsessing over how an egg is cooked is not the answer.

I think- forget the feckless uneducated mums with trollies of shit- this thread on mumsnet perfectly illustrates the problem. You’re the only person to hit on this and it’s undoubtedly one of the main drivers of the problem.

banging on about kids blood sugar and 10% loss of vitamin D from frying is mental and shows how little parents feel in control of this.

where I disagree though is I think ultra processed foods in moderation have their place and aren’t going anywhere so we need to learn to live with them- with greater regulation

FudgeFudy · Yesterday 10:00

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 07:59

You cant possibly genuinely think frying an egg removes all its nutrients

Indeed, some of the black-and-white thinking on the thread is bonkers. Yes frying an egg causes if to lose some nutrients, but unless you absolutely obliterate it the great majority of the good stuff is still there. And yes the oil adds a few calories, but a calorie is not some great evil to be avoided at all costs so unless you're downing pints of the stuff it's fine. I honestly think worrying about food to this extent is more harmful than eating a sub-optimal meal now and again (or even quite often). Eat a balanced diet, lots of veg, not too much sugar, drink lots of water and do lots of exercise. That's it. No need to fret about eggs.

PensionPTake · Yesterday 10:01

captainfloaty · Yesterday 07:50

I think it's insane that public money is spent on providing school children with puddings after lunch. Who the fuck eats pudding after lunch any way? I don't know anyone in real life and surely it would be better to spend the money on a better quality main and not encourage kids to think this is normal. I mean you could give them a square of dark chocolate or something if absolutely necessary but you're more or less doubling the calorie content with some of the options you hear about and there's next to no nutritional value. Gosh, I sound like a pudding nazi but when funds are short surely this makes absolutely no sense!

For some kids it may be the only decent, or quite simply only, meal they get all day.

PlantainArama · Yesterday 10:04

Sadcafe · Yesterday 09:57

Jamie Oliver was right starting the whole campaign for better school meals years ago, but there comes a point where you bring in stuff the kids just won’t eat. Totally for fruit rather than cakes, but lentils, really, how many kids will willingly eat them and yes I know they are in with other foods not served alone. It’s finding a balance that’s important

Lentils can be extremely delicious though!

Like all the pulses, their own flavour is subtle, it's what you do with them flavour wise that counts. Pulses in general are so good for fibre and protein whilst also being extremely cheap if you buy bulk and dried.

tamade · Yesterday 10:05

Just take a step back from the outrage and consider the bigger picture. The context.

School dinners and now breakfasts, (just like hospital food and catering in army barracks etc) are provided by service companies. To get the business they have to meet the decision makers' expectations and be cheaper than the opposition, to make money they have to provide the meals and services at below the quoted price. The net result is cheap processed food full of empty calories.

Now they are trying to regulate an issue which is baked into the(ir) cake.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · Yesterday 10:10

I’m surprised secondary school kids can’t have a pastry, that seems a bit unnecessary.