Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think Varley should not be allowed to change his name?

15 replies

Netcurtainnelly · 15/07/2026 15:53

Secret Identity Change: Because a heavy bounty was reportedly placed on his head by other prisoners, Varley legally changed his name via deed poll to "Harry Jae Robb" in a desperate attempt to hide from other inmates. 1]

Monster in disguise: Jamie Varley tries to hide his identity in prison

Jamie Varley has launched a desperate bid to save his skin and distance himself from his horrific crimes - by changing his name, the Daily Mail can reveal.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15961925/monster-disguise-Jamie-Varley-hide-identity-prison.html

OP posts:
GisGasGus · 15/07/2026 15:57

What does it matter, unless his new name was a secret it makes no difference. Prisoners aren't stupid.

Netcurtainnelly · 15/07/2026 16:00

Not the point. I don't think he should be allowed too.

OP posts:
LlynTegid · 15/07/2026 16:03

Solitary confinement should be the option. The law should be changed so that a prisoner cannot change his or her name until no longer serving a sentence or out on licence.

CloudyWithAChanceOfCustard · 15/07/2026 16:08

Well it hardly matters does it…as clearly it’s no longer a secret! 🤷‍♀️

ExplodingSmittens · 15/07/2026 16:09

Lots of Paedophiles change their names just before conviction to stop people finding out about their crimes. I don’t think it should just be Prisoners who are stopped, it should be anyone charged of a crime.

ginasevern · 15/07/2026 16:12

No he shouldn't be allowed to change his name. But realistically he could change it to Prince Harry and the other prisoners will still know exactly who he is.

NoCommentingFromNowOn · 15/07/2026 16:12

How do prisoners know? Do they have access to the BBC news, or papers, or is it their visitors who tell them?

TofuTuesday · 15/07/2026 16:12

I don't think prisons should be so unsafe that violence is a real risk. Where does it end?

ExplodingSmittens · 15/07/2026 17:24

NoCommentingFromNowOn · 15/07/2026 16:12

How do prisoners know? Do they have access to the BBC news, or papers, or is it their visitors who tell them?

Most have a small TV and some have a radio as well. Lots do also have unofficial phones.

There is more in this guide

Cell life

As a prisoner you will spend a significant amount of time being locked in your cell. Everybody except those on Basic will have access to a small TV with a limited selection of channels, but in most…

https://doingtime.co.uk/how-prisons-work/life-behind-the-wall-doingtime/cell-life/

NoCommentingFromNowOn · 15/07/2026 17:55

ExplodingSmittens · 15/07/2026 17:24

Most have a small TV and some have a radio as well. Lots do also have unofficial phones.

There is more in this guide

Brilliant link, thank you.

KTheGrey · 15/07/2026 21:27

Netcurtainnelly · 15/07/2026 16:00

Not the point. I don't think he should be allowed too.

I agree, actually. He is the same person and he is a dangerous person. That’s his name and it is necessary to know where he is - he has no right to be forgotten or to have his
criminality disguised by adopting another persona or name.

I imagine he will be kept separately from the majority of prisoners for his own safety anyway.

KTheGrey · 15/07/2026 21:30

TofuTuesday · 15/07/2026 16:12

I don't think prisons should be so unsafe that violence is a real risk. Where does it end?

Well they aren’t safe for prison officers, so we already know they aren’t reaching the standards we would like.

TofuTuesday · 15/07/2026 22:07

KTheGrey · 15/07/2026 21:30

Well they aren’t safe for prison officers, so we already know they aren’t reaching the standards we would like.

It’s appalling. Nowhere should be so unsafe that staff and inmates are at risk of harm or death. We are supposed to be a humane society, we should protect people from harm.

Netcurtainnelly · 15/07/2026 22:11

TofuTuesday · 15/07/2026 22:07

It’s appalling. Nowhere should be so unsafe that staff and inmates are at risk of harm or death. We are supposed to be a humane society, we should protect people from harm.

Preston wasnt protected from harm.

OP posts:
Realitybitesyerbum · 15/07/2026 22:23

No he shouldn’t. There should be a traceable history of name changes so even if someone does it you can still find out their name history. Also the other prisoners have eyes - they’ll know by his ugly mug even if he does change his name. That won’t offer him protection. He’s scum, I wish we had the death penalty back.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page