Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it can be more tax-efficient for savings to be in a lower-earning spouse’s name?

27 replies

WaryKhakiMentor · 13/06/2026 17:47

For couples where one person pays a higher rate of tax and the other earns less, it seems like it could be more tax-efficient for savings to be held in the lower earner’s name. Given allowances and tax bands, I’m wondering whether this is something people commonly do in practice.

AIBU to think this is the more sensible approach?

OP posts:
WheretheFishesareFrightening · 14/06/2026 14:50

labradorservant · 14/06/2026 14:17

That’s me at the moment. Had to ask me to transfer him some cash for an investment (tax efficient one that’s better for him to do!) the other day.
I am nice enough to have them on a spreadsheet should I die, but he can’t access them currently.

Same, they’re all detailed on a spreadsheet and he has access to all the log in details - but I would love to see him try and figure it out 😂

FusionChefGeoff · 14/06/2026 16:43

Yes we do this

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread