Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

#Carriegate

8 replies

onanotherday · 20/06/2022 10:10

So yet another sorry story. Are we also subjected to a superinjuction, or is free speech allowed here? Is so what are your thoughts?

OP posts:
balalake · 20/06/2022 10:43

Criticism should be of Boris Johnson, not Carrie Johnson. I objected to the Carrie Antoinette characterisation, for example.

I would like the issue raised on Wednesday at Prime Minister's questions, as the injunction does not apply in Parliament (if there is one). As happened with the naming of Ryan Giggs over his attempt to silence Imogen Thomas.

ShutOffTheLights · 20/06/2022 10:50

What have I missed? If there is an injunction in place this thread is likely to go poof so please PM me!

PandoraP · 20/06/2022 10:58

Job affair right?

jossysgiant · 20/06/2022 11:00

I suspect the injunction is in place to cover extra curricular activities with Jack Coldpith (name changed for anonymity) but the 100 grand job got caught up in it

CredibilityProblem · 20/06/2022 11:07

This is the story.

Clearly not the subject of a super-injunction since the Guardian is publishing. But the Times pulled it anyway.

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/19/carrie-johnson-and-the-curious-case-of-the-vanishing-times-story

CredibilityProblem · 20/06/2022 11:08

There may of course be another story about the state of the Johnsons' marriage. Who can tell.

venusandmars · 20/06/2022 11:19

I've got a printed copy of that issue of the Times (Scottish islands must get their editions sent early). It feels like a prized possession Grin

New posts on this thread. Refresh page