Calories on the menu - just why? Part 2

[marmiteadict]

Finding this really informative so wanting to carry on the discussion.

Why, when there are conflicting needs, does describing how an action caters to a set of equally important needs of a majority get conflated with minimising the needs of a minority? It doesn't. What needs to happen is alternative provision not the removal of provision. Just because wheelchair users might need to use a lift provided this doesn't necessitate the removal of a staircase for the majority to use. Equally just because calorie counts might trigger some people towards disordered eating it shouldn't require the removal of calorie counts on menus which cater for the majority.

I agree that the majority of people on this thread were asking for dual provision.