Kinsey wrote, “It is difficult to understand why a child, except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched . . . or disturbed at even more specific sexual contacts . . . [T]he emotional reactions of the parents, police officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact, may disturb the child more seriously than the sexual contacts themselves.”
Kinsey was a sick man who completely ignored the women he polled and most said they were frightened when they were sexually abused and he said the above. The tables in his book which he used to ‘prove’ that children are sexual beings from birth were criminal child abuse described as research. How and why was this allowed to happen?
‘Some of the information Kinsey reported could only have been gathered through criminal activity. There is no other way to explain his tables detailing the timing, number, and frequency of sexual climaxes observed in children between the ages of 2 months and 14 years. As it turns out, buried in the report, Kinsey admits that these statistics were taken from the personal diaries of pedophiles (although Kinsey did not use that term).
More recently, members of the medical and psychological community have examined these tables and commented that not only is it illegal to treat children in this way, but abusive and inhumane, since “a significant number of the children would have had to be forcibly held down,” and “the emotional trauma involved could have been extremely serious, perhaps even fatal in some cases.” 3 Yet, there was no effort on Kinsey’s part to follow-up on his “research” with these children to determine if damage had been done.’
‘Sexologists’ university professors are using this research to destigmatise pedophilia, it’s v disturbing.
AIBU to be concerned by this?