To ask what the difference is between

[GinUser]

a civil partnership (today's Supreme Court ruling) and a registry office wedding, which does not have any religious overtones?

I was wondering this earlier - from the brief article I read is seems like this couple didn't like the history of weddings being about the woman basically becoming the mans property, promising to obey.

Even thought modern ceremonies aren't like that they didn't like the history and saw a civil partnership as more even.