Just had a bit of a to do with my dm re my df and his mobility scooter.
Briefly, df can walk a bit with a frame (very short distances), but is much better off using a wheelchair or a mobility scooter. He has both.
Parents are coming to stay next weekend, and DM has suggested we go to local pub for lunch. Local pub is old building, very little space inside. I said that would be fine, but to make sure they brought wheelchair so df could use it in pub rather than scooter. DM said no, df would use scooter. I pointed out that there is very little space in pub, so wheelchair would be much better as can be folded up or df could stay in it whilst we eat (which he's very happy to do).
We then has an argument, with dm saying the pub would have to accommodate the mobility scooter. I totally get that if my df only had the mobility scooter, or if he was very uncomfortable in a wheelchair, then that would be fine. But the mobility scooter is large, df can't sit on it to eat lunch, so it would have to be put near the table and take up loads of space. And he really is very happy in his wheelchair (he uses it at home rather than the scooter).
So, given that he has a choice, shouldn't he choose the option that least impacts on everyone else, given that it doesn't make any difference to him?
DM has made me feel like I'm being totally unreasonable. Am I?