Give me your best, flamers!

[saladcreamwitheverything]

Not sure where I start! And I'm not convinced anyone shares my path anyway!

1. My DH has a child with another woman and doesn't pay child support towards that woman.

And how do you feel about that?

Here you go OP - a flaming hot

What do you think you might be being unreasonable about?

I'm not sure I get this game?

Am I meant to say something to try and cause a arguement debate?

Well, I don't know really, as I said it's only part one. I have just retracted the post! I didn't think anyone would respond that quick!

Well, don't you think he should?

Good for you!
More money for gin and fags.

Surely you pay child support towards a child, not a woman?

zzzzzzz

ummmmm what?

I can hear one hand clapping.

And? Him and a million other blokes. Whats your aibu?

YABU for putting salad cream on everything.

HTH.

Are you my ex partners lady friend? Good luck!

Which is the unreasonable bit?

This bit?

*I can see it from both sides..obv nature dictates females will be more capable of looking after their offspring especially in the early years (ability to BF etc).

But..males are able to look after their offspring too however the legal system does seem to favour the woman IME whatever crap she comes out with

My DH has spent £20,000 in legal fees to get access to his DS1, Social Services got involved to agree with DS1's mum that he shouldn't have access to the child, yet when DH is SAHD to my DS (his DS2), they don't have any issues?? (i made a point of asking my midwife to make contact with SS to make sure there were no "outstanding issues" with regard to childcare and they never got back to her)...the mind boggles...not saying my DH is an unfit parent, but going by what SS had said previously, you would have thought he'd have been "flagged up". Wonder why Baby P and all the others got overlooked?

Anyway I suppose my point is women are supposed to be nurturing and the ideal parent but they can also be bitch trolls from hell with no regard to what the child needs whatsoever :-)

I do accept some men are arseholes and those that don't want anything to do with their kids should be castrated*

poor child :(

I was quoting OP from another thread by the way, my bold bit went wrong.

So is he not paying towards his son's upkeep because he bankrupted himself trying to get access to the child? Or what??

what's your point OP?

what response would you like?

And?