to think that Kate Middleton...

[seoladair]

..could turn the boob issue to her advantage by offering to become the patron of a breast-feeding charity?
Not really AIBU, just an observation!

I think the 'boob issue' has more to do with an invasion of her privacy rather than a stop-press: WOMAN HAVE BOOBS issue...

Why would she do that?
YABU for calling her Kate Middleton.

I think she has turned on it head by the fact that in the actual pictures she simply looks like a young woman on a private holiday with her husband... and by carrying on regardless and leaving all the nasty stuff to the lawyers.

The invasion of privacy is being dealt with, and thats the only part of the story that made me angry (ish) and I'm glad that she hasn't apologised or said anything to make anyone think she's done anything wrong.

No I don't think she should use this at all. Though it would be great if she chose such a charity because she simply wanted to, but not off the back of this.

PetiteRaleuse - I noticed that in the court documents where he was named as William Arthur whatever whatever whatever Mountbatten Windsor, she was named Catherine Elizabeth Middleton, which I found quite interesting.

In fairness, she is down in the legal documents for said 'scandal' as Mrs Catherine Middleton.

erm- not quite following you.
You think because her privacy has been invaded and she has been photographed with BREASTS she should become a patron of something totally irrelevant to her?

Christ, the poor women is going to be beleagured enough when (if) they have kids over the feeding issue, every bloody choice they make for their child from the moment it's existence is known of will become hotly debated (probably on here) and whatever she does it will be wrong - don't blame her for staying clear of it all as long as possible. If she was to do that now, people who didn't or couldn't breastfeed would no doubt have a go at her for not knowing what she was talking about

Or she could become a spokeswoman for nudists.

She should definitely sign that Page 3 petition.

ok I'm getting confused here:

Kate Middleton tits out = ok
Page 3 tits out = not ok
Breastfeeding tits out = ok
Man boobs out = what say we? I think I'll go "not ok" on the grounds of "gross".

But she hasn't ever breastfed

Or she could become a spokeswoman for peas.

I think she should be spokesperson for Beige Shoes.

What a weird idea.

You do realise she doesn't have children, don't you?

Spokeswoman for spokey-dokeys.

peas!

No cakebump- Kate Middleton= tits out NOT okay- thats what all the furore is about dear! And breastfeeding= tits out- try breastfeeding without your tits out and see how easy it is!

Spokeswamn for those non-slip mats you put under rugs.
Safety first.

spokeswoman. sausage fingers.

Spokeswoman for Sausage fingers!

Spokeswoman for quail. Poor the Quail.

Ok, no-one likes the idea [chastened]
I think she's being treated dreadfully, and thought this would be an interesting reaction to her current situation.
Regarding her never having breast-fed, she's patron of a childrens' hospice charity without having had experience (AFAIK) of terminal illness in children, and also represents an addiction charity without any family links to addiction (again AFAIK).
Anyway, it doesn't really matter; she's not exactly watching this thread looking for ideas about what to do with her life!

But if she were, which of these fantastic suggestions would she choose?

Kate Middleton tits out - ok

Breastfeeding tits out - ok

Kate Middleton tits out photographed without consent - not ok

Breastfeeding tits out photographed without consent - also not ok

Re beige shoes,
I have an actress friend who got advice from a professional stylist, and the stylist was obsessed with beige shoes. I don't know anyone who wears them. in RL.