Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Would you want to browse/flick through in a bookshop?

73 replies

pollyglot · 10/09/2026 07:13

Would this cover tempt you to pick it up and browse in a bookshop? It's not for sale-I wrote it for my family, but would love to know whether this sort of cover has general appeal? It's a bit out of proportion because I've concealed my name...thanks for advice!

Would you want to browse/flick through in a bookshop?
OP posts:
BeaAndBen · 10/09/2026 08:38

Glancing at it, my first thought was that you'd found a book from the 1950s or 60s and wondered if it was worth selling second hand.

The title, colour choice of the cover and image all seem very dated. I'd suggest a Google of similar family histories to get an idea of what works for more contemporary readers.

Sleepdeprivedandcaffinated · 10/09/2026 10:17

While the cover isn’t to my taste and I think you’ve had some fair critique, I just wanted to chip in with a massive congratulations for writing your book. It must have been a real labour of love, especially being your own family history. I hope they love it!

AbsintheMakesTheHeartGrowFonder · 10/09/2026 11:29

pollyglot · 10/09/2026 07:26

I find it terribly sad that the word ANZAC is unknown among the modern generation.

You're posting on a UK forum, not an Australian/NZ one. That's why a lot of people here aren't going to be very familiar with what 'ANZAC' means. It's just not a term we hear on any regular basis in the UK so it won't have anywhere as much significance to Mumsnetters where the vast majority of users are British.

I wouldn't pick that book up. It looks like what it is - a self-published book about a fairly standard piece of personal family history. Quite a lot of people would have exactly the same kind of stories in their own family, and there isn't really anything that would make me think yours would be more interesting or exceptional. The cover image is a lovely sketch, but that kind of drawing wouldn't be used on a cover of a professionally published book today. It looks very self-published and the design style is dated.

It's a lovely thing for you and your family to have, but wouldn't be of interest to me given the millions of other books available.

Naurrr · 10/09/2026 11:34

No, I don't know what it's about, what anzac is, and the colour and picture are really unappealing to me.

There's thousands absolutely beautiful books out now, their covers and coloured paper edges really draw you in.

beaglescurleduplikebagels · 10/09/2026 12:04

No, sorry - it looks dull and boring.

BillieWiper · 10/09/2026 12:09

No because it looks like a twee historical romance which is just not my genre. I also don't know what an Anzak is other than I had a recipe for Anzak cookies from the 80s.

TheeNotoriousPIG · 10/09/2026 12:14

I might do, but I like old-fashioned books and have read a lot of wartime literature.

As a British person, I only know what ANZAC means because I've come across the term in books and documentaries. Australian and New Zealand history isn't really taught over here, unfortunately.

leavesinthebreeze · 10/09/2026 12:16

No. I don’t like the cover. As pp say, at first glance it looks Mills and Boonish

ginasevern · 10/09/2026 14:35

@pollyglot It would interest me OP because I'm very aware of the ANZACS and Gallipoli. The fact that it's a true story would interest me even more. But I think the cover is wrong for "mass market" appeal. It isn't eye catching enough and it does give Mills & Boon vibes. However, the original sketch of the protagonists is lovely and should be treasured, so I would without question put it somewhere else in the book.

Gateappreciation · 10/09/2026 17:03

I’m British and are aware of the ANZAC term, so to me, that’s not a problem.

Hatty65 · 10/09/2026 17:09

I'm a History teacher, and know what an ANZAC is. I also used to teach about Gallipoli in WW1.

I'm surprised a lot of people don't know, but then I'm surprised at how little British history some adults don't appear to know.

yonem · 10/09/2026 17:11

I’ve heard of ANZAC Day but never heard the word used to refer to an individual before, and didn’t know they were involved in Gallipoli. I agree the cover looks quite dated (although I do like the illustration) and the title wouldn’t draw me in. It’s a combination of the layout, font and background colour that make it look old but maybe that was your intention.

TofuTuesday · 10/09/2026 17:21

I don’t know what an ANZAC is and I’m 54.
maybe if the picture was in a frame in a wide shot of a desk, or pinned to a fridge with a magnet - kind of modern day looking back? It looks very dated and a bit like it would be tucked away with the readers digests.
i don’t like the sub title, maybe just Gallipoli’s Shadow or Ghosts or The Nurse

Arlanymor · 10/09/2026 17:24

I know what ANZAC is, in fact I make Anzac biscuits for my dad... but anyway. Not sure why three titles are required, it's an old-fashioned way of representing a book. The best way to see if someone would pick it up in bookshop is to go into a bookshop and see what covers look like - in particular those that are promoted. I like the idea of the sketch being authentic and of the time, but it wouldn't grab the eye today. Plus there's no such thing as a pedestrian family history - I thought that was a very patronising comment to make - everyone's ancestors have lived through remarkable grit. It feels a bit unnecessary to dismiss other people's histories just to elevate that of your own family. There are plenty of unwritten histories that are still important, significant and fascinating.

Anseranser · 10/09/2026 17:37

Sleepdeprivedandcaffinated · 10/09/2026 10:17

While the cover isn’t to my taste and I think you’ve had some fair critique, I just wanted to chip in with a massive congratulations for writing your book. It must have been a real labour of love, especially being your own family history. I hope they love it!

This.

I'm in my 40s and my knowledge of ANZAC boils down to "Australian soldiers" and "isn't ANZAC day a thing? A day of remembrance, maybe?". I like historical fiction more than romance, and much more than biography. It's hard to tell which of those this book is. If you want to make it appeal to more people, use "second world war" rather than ANZAC or Gallipoli, both of which are more specific than necessary.

Lansonmaid · 10/09/2026 17:52

I would pick it up and browse as the First World War interests me. Could you put a picture of your relatives as they were at the time of the war on there, rather than the drawing? I think that would make it appeal to a wider audience

YourAmberExpert · 10/09/2026 17:57

LaterSunrise · 10/09/2026 07:25

It looks like what it is — self-published family history, primarily of interest only to family. So most likely not.

Mean

SummerInSun · 10/09/2026 18:26

I am your target audience (Aussie, history degree, read a decent amount of historical fiction) and your description of the book sounds great. But I don’t find the cover appealing, sorry. Not sure what it is about it though - maybe the rather drab shade of green and the very old fashioned font and old fashioned drawing? I’d probably assume it was a very old book that was being reprinted? I don’t think any of the books in this history or biography section of Waterstones look like that. I’d spend sometime browsing front covers and see what your eye is drawn to and be guided by that.

SummerInSun · 10/09/2026 18:29

Anseranser · 10/09/2026 17:37

This.

I'm in my 40s and my knowledge of ANZAC boils down to "Australian soldiers" and "isn't ANZAC day a thing? A day of remembrance, maybe?". I like historical fiction more than romance, and much more than biography. It's hard to tell which of those this book is. If you want to make it appeal to more people, use "second world war" rather than ANZAC or Gallipoli, both of which are more specific than necessary.

Gallipoli was First World War!

OP - are you in Australia or the U.K.? I’m an Aussie in London and people here have only the vaguest knowledge of Gallipoli. And don’t get me started on how little is taught about the war in the Pacific in WW2. My sons are mad keen on history and complain that as far as teaching at school goes, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour and then the Americans dropped the atomic bombs in Japan and nothing else happened!

honeyfox · 10/09/2026 18:29

I would be interested and know what ANZAC is, although yes I think the cover makes it look like it was published a long time ago.

Anseranser · 10/09/2026 18:33

SummerInSun · 10/09/2026 18:29

Gallipoli was First World War!

OP - are you in Australia or the U.K.? I’m an Aussie in London and people here have only the vaguest knowledge of Gallipoli. And don’t get me started on how little is taught about the war in the Pacific in WW2. My sons are mad keen on history and complain that as far as teaching at school goes, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour and then the Americans dropped the atomic bombs in Japan and nothing else happened!

Of course it is, whoops 🙈 There's habit for you, typing WWII even though I was thinking of WWI. I'm too late to correct it now as well, arrrrgh.

Topseyt123 · 10/09/2026 18:57

I do like family history, but I think things like this can be very niche.

It is your family history, and a nice thing for your family to have and keep so that these ancestors and what they did, wars, battles and historical events they were a part of can be remembered.

I actually like the illustration and the story behind it but don't know if it would stand out to me in a bookshop. Maybe if the border was in a brighter colour than the sage green?

I've heard of ANZAC Day in Australia because my SIL lives there and it is a public holiday I believe.

The ANZACs have not been a fighting force for a long time though. The campaigns they were involved in are enshrined in history but are no longer really within living memory. So automatic knowledge is fading fast.

DoAWheelie · 10/09/2026 19:20

I'd assume it was a reprint of a novel released roughly 100 years ago. It looks very dated with that shade of green and the art in a small box instead of across the whole cover.

MargaretThursday · 10/09/2026 19:36

Yes I would. It looks vintage to me, and I love vintage books, and the subject sounds interesting.
I'm not sure whether it would interest me enough to buy, but it would be one I might well pick up and leaf through.

pollyglot · 10/09/2026 19:52

Thanks so much for your critique. I appreciate knowing what an audience might think if at some time in the future I might want to publish it beyond my family. However, knowing that self-published family histories are one of those rather dismissed things, here's a wee snippet to give a "vibe" of the story...perhaps a clue to the style of the cover?
Chapter 5
Dulce et Decorum est

      By the end of 1914, with the war in Europe gaining momentum, several more of the voluntary nurses had fled the hospital in tears of exhaustion or stress, in shock at the visions of Hell that were their lot. 

      These young women were simply unable to steel their delicate sensibilities to the job’s demands. Soothing the brow of a rather attractive young captain had initially been the limit of their idea of the role. Instead, they were tasked right from the start with the most menial of chores, traditionally the province of the lowliest probationer nurse. One of the most shocking experiences, however, was exposure to the sight of naked men for the first time in their lives. Far worse than that, they saw them, not as healthy and vital youths discovering the precious sensuality of first love, but as bloodied meat on a butcher’s slab. Then there were the distraught girls whose fiancés, brothers, friends had already made the ultimate sacrifice. The nurses’ resignations were construed as a lack of moral fibre, creating headaches for the Joint Committee, committed as they were to the provision of desperately needed staff for the growing number of hospitals.

       Mary Somerville, a debutante of 1908 and a Colonel’s daughter, had begun her Red Cross training with Winifred in May of 1914. She had been filled with the zeal of doing something useful with her life but instead became one of the early casualties. Her two elder and one younger brother already held commissions in good County Regiments.  Products of Sandhurst, naturally. Mary and Winifred had become great pals and were each other’s ‘patients’ in their wound-bandaging classes. Poor clumsy Mary could never quite grasp the principles.  Three months into their training, the probationers installed in the new hospital, Mary was still struggling. “I say, Win, I simply can’t manage this ... how do you get this bit over that one? You make it all look so easy. Will you show me again?” 

       Win patiently demonstrated repeatedly the technique. Mary’s stubby fingers with their bitten nails never quite accomplished it. She became increasingly flustered. Had her father the Colonel been present, he would have barked at her in the manner poor Mary’s friends had overheard on his only visit to the hospital. Mary was terrified of the red-faced Colonel, with his piggy eyes, shiny bald pate and bristling nose hair, bullying his daughter as he did the lowliest private; terrified, too, of Matron and of the professional nurses who despised her incompetence. 

Her youngest brother, Hugo, a handsome subaltern and very fond of his sister, occasionally visited her on his motorcycle. He called her Mollie and treated her with kindness, taking her out in his sidecar on some of her precious afternoons off. He was evidently quite taken with his sister’s redhaired chum too, always greeting her as a great pal, with a dazzling smile and a warm, firm handshake.
On the day before The Queen’s Own (West Surreys) embarked for France, he sped up to the hospital in his sister’s brief lunchtime to say goodbye. He embraced her warmly, tipped her chin gently to brush away the tears, and kissed the tip of her nose.
“Cheerio, Mollie darling, see you for Christmas. Buck up now, old thing, or you’ll have me blubbing too.”

      Such gentle kindness was the cause of increased bullying among the more bitter professionals, having been encouraged by the Colonel’s treatment of his daughter. Mary became increasingly downhearted. 

       In early November, Mary received a brusque telephone call from her father. Twenty-year-old Second Lieutenant Hugo Somerville had been killed at Ypres on October 31st, leading his men from the front in a bold but futile attack. He had been recommended for a posthumous Military Cross. The Colonel displayed a remarkable public equanimity. The unkind described it as complacency. His son had done his duty as a man and had brought glory upon his family. 

      Dulce et decorum est pro Patria mori. 

      Mary, faced with such a loss, could find nothing sweet nor fitting in the death of her beloved young brother in such a way, before he had even become a legal adult. A few days later, she began to shake, her hands to tremble. The next day, she was simply not there. 

      The VADs’ quiet efficiency soon won the grudging respect of the trained nurses. They never flinched from any task, regardless of its degree of unpleasantness. The VADs worked a long daytime shift, not yet being sufficiently experienced nor trusted to take on the frequently solo night duties. There was yet time to whip these ninnies into shape to face the realities of the long and tedious night hours, said the professionals.
OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread