Just a little of the wrong statements Nurse Campbell has mad e along with his £1 million
5 million cases of myocarditis in the UK - using wrong figures. Clearly preposterous exaggeration
Children admitted with covid - claimed it was for precautionary measures - no evidence
Claimed officials stats cant be trusted as more people registered with a GP than there are people in the uK - forgetting that people can be registered with two GPs.
Claimed the vaccine isn't a vaccine because of 10,000 side effects recorded in Western Oz - 99.7% were sore arms and feeling tired. Serious side effects were less than 1 in 50,000 and less than with infection. Gave no proof for this not being a vaccine or reasons it was not acceptable
Claimed the death rate in the UK was one in 6000 based on false extrapolation of the yellow card system when vaccines are monitored by three additional systems.
Tried to explain auto immunity and just explained immunity so patently doesn't have a clue what it is.
Implied there was a risk of MS post vaccination when the MS society denied this and incidence increased post covid infection
Claimed the death rates from covid weren't as high because people had other conditions.
Claimed caused miscarriage when there is zero evidence and every women who died in the uK who was pregnant was unvaccinated . Zero deaths in vaccinated pregnant women.
Claimed vaccines affected fertility when there is zero evidence.
Claaimed vitamin D was effective acutely when accepted evidence disputes this. The meta analysis left out negative studies. It included an observational study which cant be include in a meta analysis of that type so wasnt worth anything
Has never commented on the increased risk of death post infection (x5 ) from cardiac death in next 18 moths, the overall increase in mortality post infection , the 100% increase in dementia if over 85 , the increased neuropsychiatric disease after infection, the increased risk of MS , ITP, shingles and Guillian Barre syndrome after infection.
Has never commented on the 18 papers showing ivermectin doesnt work
Here are just a few wrong statements he has made
Ivemerctin – there is no proof it works. Yet he has made over 21 videos over 15 hours giving the wrong impression that there is a cover up for this cheap “safe “ medicine.
The WHO, FDA, CDC, manufacturer, medical colleges, NGO and the inventor all state there is currently no proof it works
John claims we need more exact information from governments – we have it – don’t use it as it doesn’t work.
He states in an interview with Russell Brand that there are no randomised controlled trials for the use of ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine which is totally false. There are at least 18 considered by Cochrane for ivermectin and three large studies for hydroxychloroquine.
He falsely claimed it was responsible for the drop in cases in Udar Pradesh when serology sampling showed there was majority positivity- either people had had it or were immunised so the rates fell before it was ever offered.
He likewise claimed a ”miracle in Japan” when it has 77% double vaccinated rate and it is not authorised for use.
He claimed a study in Brazil showed it worked when 96% of people in a non randomised trial didn’t take the drug that wouldn’t have been in the human body for 66% of the time even if they had – it makes no sense – let alone it was partly written by one person who worked for the FLCC crackpots and the other is being investigated for fraud - yet he claims the evidence is being suppressed when he just cant understand it.
He has a video entitled Oklahoma and ivermectin – all the attorney general said was they wouldn’t prosecute if it was used not that it was shown to be effective.
ARDS is not an infection – therefor that’s not where you want the antibiotics to be in the “highest concentration”
It is pointless to give the registered side effects of drugs if you don’t provide the number of drug administrations to give the relative safety
15 and 32 out of a million are not “very large differences” – they are statistically insignificant.
Aspiration before injection – zero evidence of benefit. In hundreds of billions of vaccinations -no proof . It is not recommended as it increases pain and resultant decreased uptake . There is a risk of under or non vaccination
Myocarditis – one iv injection in mice is not proof of cause and effect in humans. If this was the case then there would not be a. sex bias and variable with vaccination type. Penicillin kills guinea pigs so one animal study is worthless.
He claims that the at risk group had an 88 times increased risk of cardiac complications post Covid vaccination yet missed out that the risk from covid to the same people would be 3800 greater or that the consequences were inconsequential.
He gave a review on a discredited abstract claiming that it showed that covid vaccination would result in increased risk of heart attacks without clearly understanding what the article was claiming or even on the face of it was as there is currently no accurate tool for predicting heart attacks risk due to prior insults.
The Cochrane review is not “ some Germans” it is the biggest and most respected medical review organisation in the world.
Self published is of negligible standard.
The BBC is an internationally respected organisation which he is in the huff about as they took apart his claims that ivermectin works – along with everyone else.
Randomised studies have the same number in each arm – otherwise by definition they aren’t randomised.
Most of the studies he talks about are too small to be statistically significant.
He claimed that a paper that said “theoretical” in the title was “firm evidence” – let alone the concept was preposterous.
He promoted a metanalysis which was fundamentally flawed in nature and the second largest study was withdrawn for fraud. After being published on the authors own hospital website.
And just to finish off…
Indians don’t speak Indian.
It’s a British penny not an English penny
The liver is on the right side of the body.
He takes the word of anyone who speaks to him as gospel and presents papers without knowing anything about them.
He is not medically qualified and used to teach in accident and emergency. So apparently doesn’t have experience in ITU virology or public health.
Misleading video titles
Vitamin D, Strong evidence from Israel
Vitamin D long been established of association with poorer outcome with Covid and increased overall mortality – no evidence that supplementation or treatment alters the outcome of covid
Myocarditis after vaccination, firm data
Increased incidence – a few per million but 40 X more likely with covid infection
Ivermectin in Oklahoma
No proof about the therapeutic effect of ivermectin legal comment stating prosecution would not take place if it was prescribed
Ivermectin, Mexico, Peru, India
“evidence from a quasi-experimental analysis based on a public intervention in Mexico City”- in other words no evidence at all
Ivermectin prophylactic study from India
Not a trial - pre print not peer reviewed not blinded. Not published.
Ivermectin in Japan
Was not used or recommended in Japan.
Miracle in Japan
No miracle – no use of ivermectin and widespread vaccination.
Ivermectin or Molnupiravir
Pointless comparison of one treatment demonstrated to work with one treatment with no evidence to work and gives misleading impression that they are both effective
Home ivermectin based kits in India
Not proof of effect. Clickbait headline
Dr Lawrie, Ivermectin video,
Interview with a gynaecologist who for unclear reasons claimed to have researched ivermectin for a decade. Part of a group who withdrew their conclusions
He has been fact checked by
UK Health Security Agency
Politifact
Facebook
BBC
Wikipedia
Lead Stories
Factcheck.org
Now either they are all in on this conspiracy - or just journalists and not doctors as he ironically points out so there for anything they say is not true - or he is an old unqualified idiot.
Meaghan Kall, head of COVID-19 epidemiology at the UK Health Security Agency, said the entirety of the evidence that ivermectin is behind Japan's success is a coincidence - that the decline began two weeks after the TMA doctor's suggestion.
"The video's primary argument is a classic case of correlation ≠ causation," she tweeted of Dr Campbell's claims, saying there was no evidence ivermectin was even being prescribed in large amounts for off-label use, or by people self-treating themselves with product - usually intended for livestock - off the internet.
"There is none. Zip zero nada," she said. "It appears this is based on anecdata on social media driving wildly damaging misinformation."