Mmn.
This is a girder in the campaign to radically cut SEND funding for schools. My guess it will be rather like care in the community; in that it'll sound a good idea in theory (big, cold, badly run hospitals, institutionalisation, isolation, etc etc, wouldn't it be so lovely to have community provided care where people live) - and then turns out that there is no 'care' to be in the community, very little actual resources, just the person and community left without anything and required to find a way to manage. But it's going to sound absolutely lovely on paper.
Step one of this will be to devalue those working in SEND and suggest they're all madly over diagnosing for funsies (while actually working from the relatively decent documentation etc from the Blair Labour govt which did, actually, care and do things for this section of society, children and adults)
Then to discredit diagnoses a lot so the public stop having any respect for them and start expecting those with diagnoses to be hypochondriacs/just get on with it
Then to identify other things it could possibly be instead such as lack of exercise, diet, screens, mental health support, parenting styles, all of which would have a point and be really key to look at - but won't involve any actual proper research and certainly no action
It certainly won't be to look at why schools are becoming increasingly somewhere many children can't cope, or think about changing the fundamental issues
This is about removing funding and support from SEND children and getting society primed and messaged not to sympathise with the families and school staff that are going to be left high and dry, unable to cope, so when the outcry starts, there won't be public support for them. It's money driven, not child/need driven.