Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lilly Wachowski accused J.K. Rowling of "funding trans genocide" and compared her to the Nazis — and now, the author is responding to the Matrix filmmaker's criticism.

90 replies

ThatZanyFatball · 13/09/2026 08:50

Sounds like textbook defamation to me.

Lilly Wachowski accused J.K. Rowling of "funding trans genocide" and compared her to the Nazis — and now, the author is responding to the Matrix filmmaker's criticism.

J.K. Rowling’s rep responds to Lilly Wachowski’s accusation of ‘funding trans genocide’ (exclusive)

“The money that goes into you enjoying these products, a portion of that money goes to J.K. Rowling and that money goes into her funding anti-trans legislation all over the world,” Wachowski claimed.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/j-k-rowling-responds-lilly-194153968.html

OP posts:
nicepotoftea · 13/09/2026 18:55

There was a thread about the holocaust denial claims recently. All I will say is that anyone who wants to attack JKR should do some historical research before pulling that thread.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/09/2026 18:56

MyAmpleSheep · 13/09/2026 14:52

Which SLAPP lawsuits are you alleging JKR has used? I’m not aware of any at all, so what is your basis for saying this?

Edited

Yes, I'm keen to know more about this as well. I certainly can't bring any to mind.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/09/2026 19:00

alcovecupboards · 13/09/2026 15:16

Rivkah Brown, Nicola E Spurling, and then there was some other person who had to apologise because he couldn't afford to fight back. The point is she has used her wealth to silence critics. But when the critic is someone who could call her bluff and engage her in a legal battle that would likely require her to go under oath in filmed depositions - then she doesn't take legal action. Whatever your views on JK - any wealthy person silencing critics in this way is outrageous. It's not acceptable.

Nicola Spurling who posted "Definitely something to keep a close eye on. In recent years, Rowling has made it clear that she can no longer be trusted around children".?

I think letting that go with just an apology rather that dragging Sourling through the courts anyway was pretty fucking magnanimous myself.

Wishesandhorses · 13/09/2026 19:01

Because of course the Third Reich, as we all know, were very much into the following of British law and 21st century women's rights. The parallels are...

well, obviously, nowhere to be found.

Bonkers. Must be on whatever Mr Trump appears to be taking.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/09/2026 19:03

alcovecupboards · 13/09/2026 15:17

Rivka Brown.

Rivka Brown who called JK Rowling a Holocaust denier?

I think letting that go with just an apology rather that dragging Brown through the courts anyway was pretty fucking magnanimous myself.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/09/2026 19:07

alcovecupboards · 13/09/2026 15:27

Do you understand what a SLAPP is?

ETA: Because a multi-millionaire hasn't been sued for the saying the same thing that someone who couldn't afford to fight back has said. What is your explanation why?

Edited

Hasn't been sued yet.

Be interesting to see what happens if Wach- doubles down.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 13/09/2026 19:08

alcovecupboards · 13/09/2026 14:20

I do think it's interesting in the different ways JK - who I agree with on much - responds to people with the financial means to fight back and those who do not posses the same means. It's quite telling.

Out of interest, what do you agree with JKR on?

BezMark · 13/09/2026 19:11

It's inexplicable that someone who made one good film 26 years ago isn't being fêted for what sounds like a fairly niche film student agitprop flick and showered with Hollywood money.

MyAmpleSheep · 13/09/2026 19:17

alcovecupboards · 13/09/2026 15:16

Rivkah Brown, Nicola E Spurling, and then there was some other person who had to apologise because he couldn't afford to fight back. The point is she has used her wealth to silence critics. But when the critic is someone who could call her bluff and engage her in a legal battle that would likely require her to go under oath in filmed depositions - then she doesn't take legal action. Whatever your views on JK - any wealthy person silencing critics in this way is outrageous. It's not acceptable.

Who the fuck is Rivka Brown and what evidence do you have that JKR launched a suit against her?

Where is the evidence that JKR sued Nicola Spurling?

Spurling made a false and clearly defamatory accusation against JKR, and withdrew it on legal advice. I don’t see any evidence of a lawsuit.

Wachowski is entitled to his opinions about JKR as are Spurling and Brown, and they are all entitled to express them. Expressing an opinion is different to making defamatory statements, like Spurling and Brown did.

I have not the slightest doubt that if Wachowski said what Spurling said then JKR would have reacted the same way.

BackToLurk · 13/09/2026 19:26

From Variety

”Your enjoyment of these [Harry Potter] shows, and continued support of these shows, is supporting my eradication.”

Has he joined the HP PR team?

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 13/09/2026 19:27

I feel that JKR has shown extraordinary restraint in not resorting to legal action more often. She's had plenty of defamatory stuff said about her and unlimited funds to pay the lawyers. But she mostly retaliates with a few pointed and extremely well chosen words, and leaves it at that.

MyAmpleSheep · 13/09/2026 19:33

Somebody seems to be thinking that because you’re rich, it must be ok to call you a paedophile and a holocaust denier. But if you’re not rich then it’s not ok. Which seems a very odd argument. Or perhaps it’s ok regardless of how much money you have: “If I personally don’t like you, then everyone else can say what they like about you and you just have to take it.”

Secondly, someone can’t see the difference between hyperbole about trans rights issues on which JKR and Wachowski clearly disagree, and suggesting JKR denies the holocaust and is a danger to children, which are simply character slurs with nothing to do with JKR’s views on sex and gender.

Maaate · 13/09/2026 20:24

Somebody seems to be thinking that because you’re rich, it must be ok to call you a paedophile and a holocaust denier

What's even better is if you respond to the libel via the same platform it was posted on you will then get accused of punching down and setting your followers on poor vulnerable and marginalised folx.

AstonCanKissMyArse · 14/09/2026 12:00

MyAmpleSheep · 13/09/2026 19:33

Somebody seems to be thinking that because you’re rich, it must be ok to call you a paedophile and a holocaust denier. But if you’re not rich then it’s not ok. Which seems a very odd argument. Or perhaps it’s ok regardless of how much money you have: “If I personally don’t like you, then everyone else can say what they like about you and you just have to take it.”

Secondly, someone can’t see the difference between hyperbole about trans rights issues on which JKR and Wachowski clearly disagree, and suggesting JKR denies the holocaust and is a danger to children, which are simply character slurs with nothing to do with JKR’s views on sex and gender.

And drastically misunderstanding the SLAPP concept - it does not mean 'somebody I don't like threatened somebody I do like with legal action, over the very illegal thing that the somebody I like definitely did'.

Then again, if you think some men are actually women, your logic chip is clearly malfunctioning so I don't know why we expect any sense on other topic. Hope over experience, probably.

Edit for clarity/typos

AstonCanKissMyArse · 14/09/2026 12:05

I really do think there is a massive misunderstanding about what freedom of speech and belief means.

Its as though some people think they have the right to say whatever they like because it's 'their opinion,' (or their truth as they might tellingly describe it) , and finding out that they actually don't comes as a shock, which leads to tantrums.

Similarly, prefacing their defamation with 'I believe' eg 'i believe x is a paedophile' doesn't magically make it ok.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page