Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lactation support conference in Ireland - the quiet part out loud

281 replies

ArabellaScott · 25/08/2026 11:16

https://genspect.org/where-does-male-lactation-fit-in-breastfeeding-support-networks/

'This year’s program lists a lactation consultant called Jacob Engelsman speaking on “communicating inclusively: creating gender-affirming clinical spaces for families” and “lactation support for gender-diverse families”.'

'Jacob Engelsman is a Certified Lactation Consultant based in the US. He describes himself as an infant care specialist, speaker, and writer. He is the author of a recently published book, Lactation for the Rest of Us: A Guide for Queer and Trans Parents and Helpers, and specialises in inducing lactation in non-gestational parents (parents who haven’t given birth). “Lactation is for anyone” Jacob tells us in this podcast interview.
Engelsman’s interest and expertise is not limited to lactation for the purpose of feeding an infant. One of his previous presentations was “Inducing Lactation for Kinksters” and according to his CV he has been giving various talks including on lactation at Frolicon, an adult lifestyle and fetish convention held annually in Atlanta, Georgia with substantial programming around kink, BDSM, sexuality, polyamory, LGBTQ+ relationships and alternative sexual/family cultures.
He is not a nurse, midwife, doctor, or healthcare professional (nor does he claim to be). He is not a parent or someone with personal experience of breastfeeding. He got his certification five years ago and prior to that worked in the food service industry.'
...
'Why would a man want to lactate? In Engelsman’s own words:
“There are several reasons a person may choose to lactate regardless of whether they can gestate a child…a non-gestational parent might choose to induce lactation as a way to feel emotionally closer to the baby, assert their own feelings of parenthood, gender euphoria, or just for the unique experience of it.” (p.49)
Writing specifically about “cis” men, that is men who identify as men, he says:
“As to the question of why they would want to, it seems reasonable to believe that cis men want to lactate for the same reasons as anyone else. Which is to say, usually to feed and bond with their baby and to a lesser extent for curiosity, fun, or sexual gratification.” (p.152)'

Where Does Male Lactation Fit in Breastfeeding Support Networks? — Genspect

The Association of Lactation Consultants in Ireland (ALCI) will host its annual conference this coming October in Galway. Promotional posts on social media feature a lactation consultant, Jacob Engelsman, who promotes some practices that many people fi...

https://genspect.org/where-does-male-lactation-fit-in-breastfeeding-support-networks/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
honeyrider · Yesterday 14:17

AngleofRepose · Yesterday 13:56

Once/if ALCI get wind that you have posted the programme, I predict that they will ask MN to delete your post (don't ask me how I know this), so I recommend that if anyone reading this wants to keep a copy of the programme for themselves, screenshot or otherwise save it before it disappears!

I've taken screenshots, thanks for raising that.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · Yesterday 13:57

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 10:01

And I was like, no, they're lying to you.

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????

So also lacks basic competence.

I had three children. I never actually had any formula in the house during the months when any of them was feeding exclusively on milk. In fact I have never bought any formula milk, even for a friend!

But clearly I am a liar. Oh well.

AngleofRepose · Yesterday 13:56

Cailin66 · Yesterday 13:43

As the ACLI deleted their conference programme here it is for posterity ...

Once/if ALCI get wind that you have posted the programme, I predict that they will ask MN to delete your post (don't ask me how I know this), so I recommend that if anyone reading this wants to keep a copy of the programme for themselves, screenshot or otherwise save it before it disappears!

Cailin66 · Yesterday 13:43

As the ACLI deleted their conference programme here it is for posterity ...

Lactation support conference in Ireland - the quiet part out loud
Cailin66 · Yesterday 13:41

Sale of tickets cancelled due to 'health and safety' - speaker details deleted. This change to their website was done today. Clearly mad scenes going on their website as they frantically try to back-peddle

Lactation support conference in Ireland - the quiet part out loud
Cailin66 · Yesterday 13:39

This mornings change, I assume the international speak was Jacob

Lactation support conference in Ireland - the quiet part out loud
TheKeatingFive · Yesterday 12:18

AimsAndObjectives · Yesterday 11:36

Many of us have an ick factor about anal sex. We had to work to overcome, or at least publicly suppress, that ick factor to fully accept homosexuality in men. Maybe that has made us more prone to suppressing other, more important, ick factors.

Yes that’s a really good point.

But it strikes me as not particularly difficult to understand that there are historical taboos that serve no useful purpose (gay sex) and taboos that are still very much relevant (a man with a breast feeding fetish).

The point is not to decide that if we overcome one we have to overcome all. The point is to draw the line somewhere sensible for the needs of society. I’m not sure why that distinction is difficult for people.

Kingdomofsleep · Yesterday 12:17

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 11:46

Yes, I agree that it's a power play.

But taking him at face value he is a breast feeding consultant who isn't familiar enough with breast feeding mothers to believe that some women breast feed exclusively.

I don't like to think of him reading anonymous breast feeding forums, but does he really think that women who worry whether their exclusively breast fed baby will take a bottle are making it all up for kudos?

I'm trying to imagine seeking help with breast feeding from somebody whose default assumption is that I am lying.

He probably just doesn't know many mums very well, because not many mums would want to hang out with him.

Although I do think there's a bit of a prevailing societal attitude in the uk that breastfeeding is very hard, and it's rare to get on with it easily, and his comments fit in that category. I think that general attitude is off-putting to first time mums and indirectly contributes to the low uptake and continuation of breastfeeding.

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 11:46

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:30

I read that as a possible power play. Positioning himself as expert and honest. Suggesting mothers are liars also can be useful for plausible deniability. Found it interesting on that interview how he was pissing himself laughing at things that aren't at all funny.

Yes, I agree that it's a power play.

But taking him at face value he is a breast feeding consultant who isn't familiar enough with breast feeding mothers to believe that some women breast feed exclusively.

I don't like to think of him reading anonymous breast feeding forums, but does he really think that women who worry whether their exclusively breast fed baby will take a bottle are making it all up for kudos?

I'm trying to imagine seeking help with breast feeding from somebody whose default assumption is that I am lying.

Kingdomofsleep · Yesterday 11:39

Cailin66 · Yesterday 09:59

Can you please stop. In the neonatal I was in I breast-fed and expressed. The nurses gave me the small bottles to do so. I’d hand them over and the nurses named them and dated them, using excess for the other babies. No I wasn’t tested for diseases etc. Don’t overthink it. It’s a simple matter of trust, the nurses knew I and every other parent were there trying to do our best for our children. Throwing away such milk would have been outrageous as it was so beneficial to the tiny babies. The first time I breastfed they supervised me to make sure I got it right, after that I did it in a private room, and my husband was often with me. They got him to change our babies nappy the first time in the incubator. In the room he too could hold our baby, as human contact is so important. Those nurses would never let anyone harm a baby. Their dedication was outstanding.

That's really kind that you did that. I already said that it is different if it's done in hospital rather than at home.

It is indeed a matter of trust. And it is purely the fault of bad actors like the man described in the op, when mothers like me lose trust.

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:39

Fwiw 'ick' being examined and considered is okay. Prejudices can be harmful. They can also be rational - if we know one sex commits 99% of sex crime its rational to bear that in mind in risk assesssment. .

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:37

Datun · Yesterday 11:28

'....it's funny you say that because every mom I'm friends with their baby is exclusively breasted.
And I was like, no, they're lying to you. They don't want to lose face because there's shame surrounding it.
You are all just lying to each other.

yeah, it's just opening the door to encouraging non-exclusive breastfeeding, so he can normalise getting sexual kicks out of squeezing some man juice out.

What I really hate about it is the faux concern for women and, if you weren't subjected to so much sexism, this wouldn't be happening.

It's the dressing up of his raging misogyny under the guise of anti-sexism.

it comes to something, when men claiming they are for women, is actually a massive red flag.

On word choice, I'd say he noticeably steers away from 'women'. Prefers to use unisex terms. 'Queer'and LGBTQI etc.

'Trans' reasoning provides an excellent reason to avoid use of 'woman' and 'mother'.

OP posts:
AimsAndObjectives · Yesterday 11:36

TheKeatingFive · Yesterday 11:02

Totally agree with all this.

I think it was a poster on here who said it (shout if anyone recognises themselves) but I found it very insightful.

That the progressive, liberal types have been taught to see that ‘ick’ factor or disgust response as something that it is virtuous to overcome. A disastrous conclusion.

Many of us have an ick factor about anal sex. We had to work to overcome, or at least publicly suppress, that ick factor to fully accept homosexuality in men. Maybe that has made us more prone to suppressing other, more important, ick factors.

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:32

Of course it is bollocks. Which is why it piqued my interest. Why lie?

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:30

Dupers delight, sprung to mind.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:30

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 10:01

And I was like, no, they're lying to you.

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????

So also lacks basic competence.

I read that as a possible power play. Positioning himself as expert and honest. Suggesting mothers are liars also can be useful for plausible deniability. Found it interesting on that interview how he was pissing himself laughing at things that aren't at all funny.

OP posts:
Datun · Yesterday 11:28

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 09:53

Another interesting section here, where he claims that mothers who say they are exclusively breastfeeding 'are lying'.

'....it's funny you say that because every mom I'm friends with their baby is exclusively breasted.
And I was like, no, they're lying to you. They don't want to lose face because there's shame surrounding it.
You are all just lying to each other. And if one of you would own up and say at some point my baby had some formula and it wasn't the end of the world, you would all be better off for it.'

How interesting. Why would he say this? Cast mothers as liars?

'....it's funny you say that because every mom I'm friends with their baby is exclusively breasted.
And I was like, no, they're lying to you. They don't want to lose face because there's shame surrounding it.
You are all just lying to each other.

yeah, it's just opening the door to encouraging non-exclusive breastfeeding, so he can normalise getting sexual kicks out of squeezing some man juice out.

What I really hate about it is the faux concern for women and, if you weren't subjected to so much sexism, this wouldn't be happening.

It's the dressing up of his raging misogyny under the guise of anti-sexism.

it comes to something, when men claiming they are for women, is actually a massive red flag.

AimsAndObjectives · Yesterday 11:27

JellySaurus · Yesterday 11:20

We know that men fetishise breastfeeding. The opportunity for them to secrete from their own bodies is very new. It has come at around about the same time as the concept of not kink-shaming has been promoted. We have no idea how many men, regardless of their self-identification, are turned on by the idea that they can now live their fetish.

Yes, I imagine that this extends well beyond the TIM brotherhood.

ColdOut2025 · Yesterday 11:25

Not an original thought; but check his bloody hard drive!!

JellySaurus · Yesterday 11:20

MarieDeGournay · Yesterday 10:38

I don't think so - the whole 'chestfeeding' thing seems to involve having to artificially induce 'lactation', and I think it fits squarely with transIDing men appropriating women's biological functions, e.g. allegedly haveing periods, and going through the menopause.

The number of transIDing women who want to breastfeed must be vanishingly small.

Not that there are millions of transIDing MEN who want to breastfeed either, but they make a lot of noise about it as if it was a human right they were entitled to..

We know that men fetishise breastfeeding. The opportunity for them to secrete from their own bodies is very new. It has come at around about the same time as the concept of not kink-shaming has been promoted. We have no idea how many men, regardless of their self-identification, are turned on by the idea that they can now live their fetish.

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · Yesterday 11:14

TheKeatingFive · Yesterday 11:02

Totally agree with all this.

I think it was a poster on here who said it (shout if anyone recognises themselves) but I found it very insightful.

That the progressive, liberal types have been taught to see that ‘ick’ factor or disgust response as something that it is virtuous to overcome. A disastrous conclusion.

You're not only fighting your conscious mind, but biological evolution. And deeply ingrained social development. No wonder the cognitive dissonance in GCs, women especially, when they hear what this guy has said, what he proposes, is off the scale.

JellySaurus · Yesterday 11:13

moto748e · Yesterday 10:55

Surely it's simple enough;'chestfeeding' obviously references people with chests, ie, men.

Men who develop ductal carcinoma have breast cancer, not chest cancer.

TheKeatingFive · Yesterday 11:02

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · Yesterday 10:58

I know Douglas Murray isn't everyone's cup of tea, but he rarely says things not worth listening to.
He's out and proud, but 100% LGB as opposed LGBTQ+.
He contends that Western society, for obvious reasons skewed heterosexual, has learnt to absolutely accept gays, the same civil rights, opportunities, lack of discrimination etc.
But that even in our most egalitarian ways, very outward gay behaviour in public still grates.
There will never be no judgement, but as a society we've settled on equal footing. Yet the biological imperative means public behaviour patterns are still judged.
We don't feel comfortable with heterosexual excess either.
As seen at more and more extreme Pride events where kink cannot will not be accepted by the vast majority.
He comments on trans, in a parallel universe, trans IDs could have gone the way of gay acceptance if it remained proportionate (especially in relation to women's and kid's rights), effectively purely societal goths for the 21st century, a continuation of the gender non confirming culture that was already established.
But anything beyond this...men in women's sex-based/sensitive spaces, youth medicalization, the enforced push to normalize transvestic paraphilia/autogynephilia, with warps like trans chest-feeding and the whole kink subculture, all wrapped up in the most brutal cancel culture/anti free speech ethos he (and we) have seen in our lives, creates the most instinctual pushback from the vast majority.
And yes, he talks about disgust. A word and concept that's banished in the West, as the Be Kind/Don't Judge moral relativism drive has all but ended talk of right and wrong, boundaries.
He says it's time to bring back the word, the concept, embrace it, and start to apply it.
He'd certainly call this fellow disgusting, his concepts and declarations disgusting, his invite disgusting, and the organisers disgusting for inviting him.

Edited

Totally agree with all this.

I think it was a poster on here who said it (shout if anyone recognises themselves) but I found it very insightful.

That the progressive, liberal types have been taught to see that ‘ick’ factor or disgust response as something that it is virtuous to overcome. A disastrous conclusion.

TheKeatingFive · Yesterday 10:59

This may have been covered already, but just to point out.

Ireland has the lowest BFing rates in the developed world. The fact they are wasting their time with this perversion instead of addressing the actual issues blows my mind completely.

I appreciate this is less important than the fact that we are talking about the sexual abuse of babies here, but it’s just another layer in the stupidity and depravity on display here.

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · Yesterday 10:58

AstonCanKissMyArse · Yesterday 10:33

Bring back the ick factor, I say!

I know Douglas Murray isn't everyone's cup of tea, but he rarely says things not worth listening to.
He's out and proud, but 100% LGB as opposed LGBTQ+.
He contends that Western society, for obvious reasons skewed heterosexual, has learnt to absolutely accept gays, the same civil rights, opportunities, lack of discrimination etc.
But that even in our most egalitarian ways, very outward gay behaviour in public still grates.
There will never be no judgement, but as a society we've settled on equal footing. Yet the biological imperative means public behaviour patterns are still judged.
We don't feel comfortable with heterosexual excess either.
As seen at more and more extreme Pride events where kink cannot will not be accepted by the vast majority.
He comments on trans, in a parallel universe, trans IDs could have gone the way of gay acceptance if it remained proportionate (especially in relation to women's and kid's rights), effectively purely societal goths for the 21st century, a continuation of the gender non confirming culture that was already established.
But anything beyond this...men in women's sex-based/sensitive spaces, youth medicalization, the enforced push to normalize transvestic paraphilia/autogynephilia, with warps like trans chest-feeding and the whole kink subculture, all wrapped up in the most brutal cancel culture/anti free speech ethos he (and we) have seen in our lives, creates the most instinctual pushback from the vast majority.
And yes, he talks about disgust. A word and concept that's banished in the West, as the Be Kind/Don't Judge moral relativism drive has all but ended talk of right and wrong, boundaries.
He says it's time to bring back the word, the concept, embrace it, and start to apply it.
He'd certainly call this fellow disgusting, his concepts and declarations disgusting, his invite disgusting, and the organisers disgusting for inviting him.