Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

UK radical feminists; what to do?

940 replies

RealRoseCritic · 29/07/2026 15:19

So there was a question earlier today in one of my groups about TERFs in the UK, why are they so strong there, etc. Let me elaborate on something.

There is something special in mainstream British feminism that is quite different from European feminism(s), but since the English speaking internet concerns mostly the Anglosphere and not Europe, due to us having separate, isolated debates in each country/language, you won't likely ever hear how the UK is substantially different.
It is important to understand the logic of British feminism. Unlike European feminism, which is mostly inclusive and focused on stuff like equal pay, care, safe design of public space and general equity, in the UK it was always about "separate but equal".

British centres of power were always men-only, and many British feminists didn't react the way European women did (aka pushed their way into male spaces, so that these became co-ed spaces), but created their own, separate spaces, which they then aggressively policed the same way British men did with theirs. Add some Victorian prudishness and bioessentialism, that was abandoned in Europe after WWII for obvious reasons, but not in the UK, and voilà, here come British second-wave radfems and the TERFs.

I am from the Czech Republic where I currently live; I lived in Norway, Poland and the Netherlands, I speak fluently multiple European languages and understand few others; I don't say that to brag, but to show my ability to do the comparative analysis, since I study the topic closely.

Out of EU member states, only in Bulgaria and Hungary are trans rights worse than in the UK at the moment, with Hungary being expected to get substantially better soon, and in neither of those two countries are trans people, and especially trans women, as demonised as in the UK.

In all EU member states transphobia comes exclusively from far right places; it is unheard of that liberals or anyone non-far right would say what is absolutely the mainstream in the UK, including Hungary and Bulgaria.
If you are saying the stuff JKR is saying, you are 100 % aligned with far right politics.

We had an attempt by a group of our far right senators to enact a bill proposal similar to what is in the UK, but the proposal was killed within a week before it could have been even voted upon in the Chamber of Deputies. Just for instance.
Scandinavian feminism is focused mostly on fair share of care and chores, German feminism focuses mostly on equal pay, Kita for everyone and the like, Polish feminism is mostly about access to abortion, Czech feminism is mostly about equal pay and safety from domestic violence - I could go on, but all in all, men are welcome to participate and the goal is to create equity for everyone, regardless of their gender. Together.
We don't get British obsession with separate spaces for women, women here are absolutely fine with the way things are, mostly because cultures in the Continent are far less prudish and overall we treat men and women as one people rather than different species.

Moreover, because of civil law rather than common law, we have different approach to legal texts and their interpretations; this makes it different too.
Not just regarding trans rights, but also regarding women's rights, I am often amazed by how much backward the UK is in so many ways compared to the EU (again, including places like Hungary, this needs to be stressed). I often see women in English-speaking debates saying things like "ugh, men" on things that actually concern problems that are specifically British and that stem mostly from both societies' tendency to separate already boys from girls, treating them differently and sexualising women in contexts we don't really see as sexual at all.

We can't really get this across the Channel, because we just don't have the power to do so. For instance Czech debate on feminism is quite isolated; it's interesting, but no more than 15 million people would ever be able to participate in it (CZ/SK) due to the language barrier, the same goes for Scandinavia (17 million), Benelux (28 million), Poland (38 million), or even DACH (95 million). It is nothing compared to half a billion people of the US, UK, CA, AU, NZ and IE that are giving tone to the worldwide debate in English.

So, if you are a British trans woman, you would do yourself a great favour if you moved to mainland Europe. You will be welcomed and cherished (for the most part).

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Keeptoiletssafe · 30/07/2026 09:34

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 09:01

News 24 formerly Sky News owned by Rupert Murdoch who is a notorious right wing propagandist & uses all his news outlets accordingly including many major news publications in Australia, The UK & USA that are responsible for ushering in oppressive right wing governments globally is an indisputable fact.

You know about his fox network in the US who was sued for nearly a billion dollars for pushing the stolen election lie? Or the disgraceful phone tapping scam in the UK?

That you are attempting to use some random poll from a notorious political propaganda outlet as evidence proof of trans sentiment rather than any concrete broad activism is not only laughable but truly unconscionable.

Lol. I have quoted Amnesty, a court report, and academic reports on cardiac arrests and pathogens in toilets. I can quote the Guardian and Mirror (two more left wing publications over here) on toilets and voyeurism if you like. Facts, coroners reports, data, court reports, statistics, legislation, regulations is what I use in my research. I have collated more on toilet incidents than you’ve had barbecues. You may be shocked to learn your views don’t align with the Communist Party over here too.

But I don’t care about anyone’s politics. I care about the reality of safe toilet design. I will also listen to everyone’s views to see if they can come up with anything novel that no one else has come up with. Things that have been tried with mixed sex designs: weighted floors (doors won’t close if it’s too heavy signifying 2 users - no good for parents and children and fat shaming), glass walls (men masturbate), alarms that respond to ‘help me’ ‘stop it’ (too expensive and difficult to respond to, misused, mistaken for visual cameras, people don’t like automatic sound surveillance, people afraid to fart in case it sets off the alarm). If you think you can beat everyone else in the world at creating a safe mixed sex public toilet, tell me your ideas. The nearest is the Portland Toilet in America which I wouldn’t fancy using unless desperate because of voyeurism.

Here’s some toilet humour to brighten your night in Australia:

UK radical feminists; what to do?
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 30/07/2026 09:32

Oh look an actual Australian who doesn't have the same opinion as you @Gretel346

On Australia’s change to 50% mixed sex toilets:
One builder told The Telegraph that the “bloody pointless” change “is the last thing this industry needs”.
“We’re trying to keep things simple, cheap, and functional and some clown from Canberra comes in with feel-good rubbish like this,” he said."

I suppose when you downunder left is right and right is left, which explains why Gretel doesn't recognise which side the fascism is coming from. Hint it's the side your shilling for.

Do you think it's fair that the fastest women's time in ParkRun, Aus is held by a male.

TeenToTwenties · 30/07/2026 09:32

@Gretel346 You never did answer my question as to why we have separate facilities / events for men and women in the first place?

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 09:29

We are okay as anonymous posters on here, I really do feel for the women and children who may encounter these aggressive, women-hating men in real life.

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 09:25

Hedgehogforshort · 30/07/2026 09:24

bad faith 😂

why are you here if it is so awful

Someone has to lift standards.

Hedgehogforshort · 30/07/2026 09:24

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 09:22

Giving yourself an uppercut is common Australian jokey saying. Its not literal but by all means go ahead & take it out of context like everything else to get a cheap clap from the peanut gallery.

Honestly, the bad faith on this forum is world class & why wouldn't it be if they have no argument other than 'because I said so'.

bad faith 😂

why are you here if it is so awful

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 09:22

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:29

Wishing violence on women. How on brand.

Giving yourself an uppercut is common Australian jokey saying. Its not literal but by all means go ahead & take it out of context like everything else to get a cheap clap from the peanut gallery.

Honestly, the bad faith on this forum is world class & why wouldn't it be if they have no argument other than 'because I said so'.

ProfessorBinturong · 30/07/2026 09:16

While you're here, @Keeptoiletssafe, I have a UK-based question. I know your info on single sex toilet design includes a specified maximum size for the top and bottom of door gaps, but I don't remember seeing a minimum. Is there one?

I've been spending a lot of time in motorway service stations the past few weeks, and it occurred to me that many of them now have much smaller gaps than they used to - not really enough to fulfil most of the functions that they should. They prevent the damp corner problem and let sound through, but give minimal ventilation and no meaningful visibility if someone collapses.

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 09:01

Keeptoiletssafe · 30/07/2026 08:25

You are very quick to dismiss the common concerns of the world’s women. Linking it up to right wingers is lazy. Employ some critical thinking skills and at least read the links.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/serving-all-users-half-of-new-public-toilets-in-australia-could-become-gender-neutral/news-story/337269c9fe455cc1433589a1591b2e6f?amp

I really hope the above doesn’t happen to Australian toilets. It will be an expensive mistake like it has been in schools who have done it over here.

News 24 formerly Sky News owned by Rupert Murdoch who is a notorious right wing propagandist & uses all his news outlets accordingly including many major news publications in Australia, The UK & USA that are responsible for ushering in oppressive right wing governments globally is an indisputable fact.

You know about his fox network in the US who was sued for nearly a billion dollars for pushing the stolen election lie? Or the disgraceful phone tapping scam in the UK?

That you are attempting to use some random poll from a notorious political propaganda outlet as evidence proof of trans sentiment rather than any concrete broad activism is not only laughable but truly unconscionable.

Seethlaw · 30/07/2026 09:01

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:17

No. I said harm dictates access not 'willies'.

When and how do transwomen present harm to women?

Dadalus · 30/07/2026 08:57

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:17

No. I said harm dictates access not 'willies'.

So transwomen are harmful in such spaces but not public toilets?

IbnBattutu · 30/07/2026 08:57

In answer to the question 'UK radical feminists; what to do?' I say that we let out a huge cheer for them. Thank goodness for them and their tenacity and courage in the face of a male sexual rights movement that is extremely damaging to women and girls and children in general. Thanks to them the UK is turning back the tide, one court case at a time. So here's to them, long may they (we) prevail.

mrshoho · 30/07/2026 08:55

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:19

And it doesn't by body policing loos?

Give yourself an upper cut.

That innate maleness is never too far from the surface.

Seethlaw · 30/07/2026 08:51

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:35

Possible, Seethlaw, but it's surprising how often these people do things that they just don't realise are beyond the pale. Because they are caught in the grip of an emotional psychodrama.

Yeah, you're probably right. It certainly makes for a great Operation Let Them Speak.

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:36

The seething rage and woman-hatred is unfortunately never far from the surface.

Keeptoiletssafe · 30/07/2026 08:36

As usual, I hope my research and logical arguments will at least inform other readers of my mission for safer designs of toilets for everyone. Particularly women, children and anyone medically vulnerable.

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:35

Possible, Seethlaw, but it's surprising how often these people do things that they just don't realise are beyond the pale. Because they are caught in the grip of an emotional psychodrama.

Seethlaw · 30/07/2026 08:33

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:29

Wishing violence on women. How on brand.

Yeah, that surprised me. It's like they are doing their best to make TRAs look bad. Is it some kind of secret terf psy-op?

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:33

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:19

And it doesn't by body policing loos?

Give yourself an upper cut.

This shifts agency from the male threatening to transgress women's boundaries (men accessing women's services is illegal, as per the Equality Act) to the imagined 'police'. And attempts to shame link to 'body shaming' etc.

Once again, it's just the 'I'll do it, you can't stop me'.

It's the exact same as Laurie Penney advising a woman that if a man masturbates in front of her child, her child should avert her eyes.

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 08:29

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:19

And it doesn't by body policing loos?

Give yourself an upper cut.

Wishing violence on women. How on brand.

Keeptoiletssafe · 30/07/2026 08:25

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:16

All this & nary a whisper of grass roots activism? Election issue? Nada.

I guess 'News 24' AKA The Daily Rupert attempting to shed its SKY image of being a right wing propaganda arm might be gilding the lily as per usual.

You are very quick to dismiss the common concerns of the world’s women. Linking it up to right wingers is lazy. Employ some critical thinking skills and at least read the links.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/serving-all-users-half-of-new-public-toilets-in-australia-could-become-gender-neutral/news-story/337269c9fe455cc1433589a1591b2e6f?amp

I really hope the above doesn’t happen to Australian toilets. It will be an expensive mistake like it has been in schools who have done it over here.

nutmeg7 · 30/07/2026 08:25

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:19

And it doesn't by body policing loos?

Give yourself an upper cut.

No it doesn’t “reduce women to the male gaze”.

”Body policing loos” recognises the reality that male people statistically present a threat to the safety of female people. Not to mention the privacy and dignity of female people.

How can you wilfully not understand the reality of lived female experience?

Surveys of women tell you what you need to know about this. The majority of women don’t want shared loos.

You seem incapable of hearing us.

Imdunfer · 30/07/2026 08:23

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:19

And it doesn't by body policing loos?

Give yourself an upper cut.

Nobody wants to body police loos.

It is men insisting on using women's loos (illegally in this country) who are raising the prospect of that being a necessity. If you simply agreed to abide by the law there would be no need for body policing.

BIWI · 30/07/2026 08:23

So a very long, considered post by @Keeptoiletssafe, with links/evidence, is dismissed by @Gretel346 with this vacuous response:

All this & nary a whisper of grass roots activism? Election issue? Nada.
I guess 'News 24' AKA The Daily Rupert attempting to shed its SKY image of being a right wing propaganda arm might be gilding the lily as per usual.

If you can't reply acknowledging someone else's contribution, then what's the point of you being here?

Oh, I know - a man wanting to be in a women's space. Again.

Gretel346 · 30/07/2026 08:19

WrongKindOfFeminist · 30/07/2026 07:27

What this idea does is reduce womanhood to the subject of the male gaze. How unsurprising.

And it doesn't by body policing loos?

Give yourself an upper cut.