Mail carry out investigation into Trans terror group Bash Back

GB news on Bash Back saga with Amy Gallagher who calls out the hypocrisy of some Labour politicians:

https://nitter.net/OkayBiology/status/2005372510112817364

Another Mail article JKR getting involved is helping :

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15417959/JK-Rowling-trans-activists-threats-mob-planning-smash-offices-senior-politicians.html

Bash Back are now panicking a little they told the Times this:

A spokesperson for Bash Back said: “We take action to stand up for ourselves in a country that is increasingly hostile to trans people, because the traditional modes of protest are not working due to the sheer amount of money from billionaires like Rowling funnelled into opposition to our rights and freedoms. We never go out of our way to cause harm to any human being and discourage and condemn actions that do so.”

They can lie as much as they want we know this about normalising male violence for a special group of men. It is no different to the usual nonsense these religious men can be violent because religion told them to, these poor men can be violent because they are poor, rich men can be violent because they are rich. These political men can be violent because they are political. There are always excuses. Oh this women said words I have to hit her. We have heard it all before. We get it boys like getting into scraps, go to the gym fight it out, just be normal adult men and don't take physical criminal aggression into everyday life because we know it wrecks families, countries etc.

Obviously this is counter productive for the TAs. The big problem for the TAs is nothing radicalises and peaks normal people like the realisation that TAs like these are just men in dresses who like threatening violence against women and property and even carrying it out. Beyond that the TA prison campaign involves covering up for male criminals who justify crimes as if wearing dresses when being criminal means they are magically less male or criminal. They relied on a huge cover up to prevent this knowledge getting into the public sphere.

The irony is of course that a chunk of "normal" "trans" men in dresses are actually pretty non violent, just like most guys in trousers don't resort to threatening women all the time to get their way. The issue as always is that violent criminal men need to be reigned in no matter what clothes they wear. It isn't that difficult. It just involves being able to see male criminal aggression and calling it out.

Bash Back is definitely a let them speak type moment.

Anyone who wants to take advantage of this now is the time to right to BBC or MPs etc and ask for public enquiry into trans terror attacks. The cover up must end. Use this useful list from Sex Matters it isn't even up to date and it is terrifying;

Intimidation, threats and violence by trans-rights activists
A chronological list of incidents affecting gender-critical women in the UK

https://sex-matters.org/about-us/what-we-are-up-against/intimidation-threats-and-violence-by-trans-rights-activists/

Bash Back should not be seen as a reaction to the Supreme Court decision - it is just a continuation of the normal pattern of male threats central to the TA movement.

Of course they don't. If you look into US Bash Back they were a tiny group being criticised by normal gays for their stunts and rhetoric etc and they are attempting to justify what they are doing as if it is some kind of remarkable thought process to think the best response to violence is more violence. Obviously lesbians in particular were well placed to see how dumb stuff like Bash Back is, this sort of glorification is very different to ideas of self defence. Especially as this was at a time between 2007 and 2011 when US gays were clearly socially advancing at a huge rate without having to get involved in bar fights as if doing that was a great win for gay rights.

When they can't see that is just a typical Americanised pseudo masculine simplistic type of thinking tied into the violent rhetoric of leftist revolutionaries to justify it. Thoughtful men, gay and straight, can see the futility of violence as a standard response to everything, it is a pattern men can fall into more easily than women, but it is a human failing to be sure. It is a fact that gay liberation movements worldwide generally did not resort to violence, their was a division between those favouring more direct action and protests and more gradual campaigns, but the key reason they won is through peaceful campaigning and reasonable argument. Stonewall was a significant moment, but its highlighting ties into a deeper point about the normalisation of violence in US culture. Note how TRA rhetoric relies on this sort of thinking in particular, because they want to pretend male pattern violence isn't male pattern violence if the males concerned are wearing dresses.