Mail carry out investigation into Trans terror group Bash Back

But all these 'resistance' groups use tactics that seem counter productive, don't they? I'm thinking of Just Stop Oil causing traffic chaos, a militant vegan group in my town breaking butchers' windows, that absolute scumbag Palestine protestor nearly breaking a police woman's back. BB are no different.

Edited to add: I also think they like the image of themselves as fiery young turks, fighting the good fight, smashing the system.

This is baffling

Did bash back really think this was a good idea and will convince people that they are 'on the right side of history'.

Hopefully this will make the police sit up and take notice, I'm fairly certain it will increase the Mails interest in this group.

“Bash Back's behaviour seems oddly counter-productive. Actions like this will only alienate the public.”

It absolutely is bonkers. Unless you think of it as them playing to their supportive audience only. Perhaps they think their egregious acts fire up peaceful action to follow through. Added to that, these people are likely fulfilling their revolutionist dreams. They can say they were like those throwing the first brick / stone. Whatever.

It also puts, in their mind and their supporters, their plight as one of extreme righteousness. These actions are warranted because of the genocide rhetoric used.

I really don’t think that their audience is the general public.

I'm not sure I'd want to mess with GCHQ. But the muppets probably think those letters stand for Gender Critical Head Quarters.

😂

Bash Back's behaviour seems oddly counter-productive. Actions like this will only alienate the public. In fact, I do wonder sometimes if a lot of so-called trans activists are agents provocateurs or fifth columnists, because their behaviour (violence, intimidation, threats and so on) seems designed to turn people against their cause.

Apart from alienating the public, they have quite clearly committed a criminal offence which should, if the police do their job properly, lead to them being publicly identified and prosecuted. I can't imagine they think this is a good outcome, but perhaps I'm wrong.

A final thought: the Canary has reported on this without any acknowledgement that a criminal offence has been committed or that hacking people's private data is morally wrong. It doesn't seem to realise that it too (if I've understood the law correctly) is breaking the law by publishing the names. It goes to show that these people are both very stupid and quite unfettered by any kind of moral understanding.

Targeting people for supporting freedom is such a weird thing to do. What are their aims? “Let’s stamp out “wrong donation”, lads, it’ll bring our goal of “capital punishment for wrong think” closer?

I have been around FWS for years and I have tried very hard to be sympathetic to people with gender distress. But this lot make it very are to deny what I have, actually, always seen - a bunch of personalitu disordered dysfunctional dickheads.

A grown up needs to step in. Anyone know where to find one of them?

I totally get that many absolutely do not want their name 'out there', which is why the anonymous box exists to be ticked in the first place. I'm not one of them and my comments were about me - why did I feel an immediate sense of panic? I'll give my money to whomever I damn well please! And be public about it if I so choose. Anyway, FSU say some names appear to be made up.

FSU say the police have been notified and also the National Cyber Security Centre, which is part of GCHQ. I'm not sure I'd want to mess with GCHQ. But the muppets probably think those letters stand for Gender Critical Head Quarters.

FSU's legal team have been firing off take-down notices and their lawyers are going to be way more competent and on the ball than anyone BB can come up with.

I don’t think I have directly donated to the FSU and wouldn’t really care if I was on the list, but obviously that isn’t the case for many others on the list, and it needs to be robustly dealt with pour encourager les autres.

Some of us, for reasons of working in captured fields, have good reason to fear being outed. When I donate to Crowdjustice, I untick the box that displays my name.

I am very glad that I didn't donate to FSU. In their email, did they confirm whether they'd reported this cyber attack to the police?

I had an email from FSU at 7.30pm this evening (Monday) telling me my details appear on the list. But it's name, amount donated and any comments made along with the donation. So, in fact, stuff that is usually visible when I donate to any crowdfunder. I will not worry about this. Toby Young says no financial details have been hacked but they're not 100% sure about email addresses. That last bit I might worry about.

They did get their system checked out by a cyber security firm who assured them it was safe - but they were wrong. It sounds like they've taken all the right reporting steps.

It would be wonderful to see these shits in deep, deep trouble for the chaos they cause.

“No issue apart from personal details including who you choose to donate to published”? Oh well, that’s alright then! Why stop there?!

This came to my attention seeing that idiot Willoughby trying to expose anyone he thought had the same (pretty generic) names as people on the list, which is a very silly game to be playing.

So many data protection, cyber security, libel issues abound here that it’s hard to know where to start. Even Glinner shrugging it off as ‘inconsequential’. It’s nothing of the sort.

Never in my life thought I’d find myself aligned with Toby Young but here we are.

I hope FSU take action and also can get control of the narrative publicity wise.

So 2065 people have been smeared on the internet for their unwitting association with 20 people who are rich or nasty

I must admit that I don’t see why being “outed” as donating to FSU would be an issue, beyond not wanting your personal details including who you choose to donate to, published.

Hahaha they really are the kings of DARVO.

Yes.

The Canary's spin is that it's all rich Brits and racists. https://archive.is/9O7hr

I snagged a copy of the CSV file to check it for friends and family to warn them if they've been outed. Before I deleted it, I totted up the unique names and donor ids. There's 2085 donors. The Canary mentioned 20, by name or by comment. So 2065 people have been smeared on the internet for their unwitting association with 20 people who are rich or nasty, 18 if you think that donating in memory of Charlie Kirk or expressing support for a serving US vice-president isn't actually racist. The Canary have smeared over 2000 people based on fewer than 1% of the donors.

Well we’ve been telling them this for years but they always maintained it was the far right US dollar funding it all

Anyway, what have they got to say for their stunning revelation that it’s ordinary people funding the crowdfunders?

I doubt Whittle cares - she also makes nasty comments and celebrates violence against TERFs

If you are going to visit the Bash Back website, use Tor. These people have demonstrated that they can't be trusted with your IP address.

And thus far they've pretty much had their wish.

How sad it would be if it's Bash Back who finally get the government and our institutions to notice how aggressive, deluded and anti social the gender ideology movement is. Though I did think the insufferable crick kids might have been the tipping point, maybe its needed the naked male aggression to be as clear as it is here.

I bet the likes of Whittle are tearing their hair out at this lot constantly saying the quiet part out loud.

Testing for & exploiting an insecure plugin isn't on a par with Susie "ex- IT manger" Green leaving a server wide open to any passer-by interested in the personal details of Mermaids' service users. Taking the site offline, self-reporting to & co-operating with the ICO are all good steps to take.
Bash Back having decided to host the stolen data as if they were showing off a proof of concept at a Black Hat hackathon, & not a band of inadequately socialised feckwits with all the opsec of hyperactive toddlers, is also very helpful.

Edited for dyslexia, some may remain

Surely I'm not the only one receiving a plain brown envelope containing £1,000 in crisp £20 notes with a USA postmark every month?

Are you saying they are saying we made up the Southern Baptists (cheque in the post). 😂