GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose

He's totally transparent, isn't he. Just wants to keep the money coming in.

I wonder if Maugham hoping that JKR becomes involved in this because of the disgusting things Ms XX has said & written about her? His last post on X is him literally begging JKR to sue him, imagine the £££ he could grift crowdfund off the back of that.

Off topic, but I'm finding it amusing that the "Good Law Project" doesn't actually seem to be good (in any sense).

It's almost as if calling yourself something doesn't actually mean that you are that thing.

Seem to have managed to say it to Victoria M 😁

One of the key arguments about the whole issue is the safety, privacy and dignity of women from males, particularly males who may have a sexual motivation to be around women without their consent.

We can't ignore the elephant in the room in a public debate.

If you market yourself as a normal, woman with normal non sexualised behaviour then publicly contradict that concept ESPECIALLY when you also market yourself as in the public eye as a journalist who may seek to influence you automatically become accountable for your own actions in UK law.

The premise of the three pillars of democracy where free speech and the media interact with public accountability isn't going to suddenly change because some trans activists decide it should.

That's just how it works. The threshold of privacy changes in terms of what you should expect.

If a politician said, "I believe in wholesome traditional family values" and posed with his wife and kids, he can expect to be commented on repeatedly my multiple individuals if he's caught shagging someone he shouldn't, particularly if it's in a public or non vanilla way.

Because it's about the difference between what someone says and what they demonstrate.

Molly thinks that 14 year old girls are responsible for their own actions remember. And that they shouldn't be infantilised. So Molly will be applying this to grown adults including himself too.

Molly doesn't think that women should be given the options to consent to sharing facilities with males and Molly thinks that transwomen who fail to disclose their sex before performing sexual acts are hard done by. So trying to have a claim that in any way refers to consent would be interesting given Molly's own beliefs.

Also it was JKR who retweeted the 14 year old girl tweet so if Molly was really upset, surely Molly would be issuing legal papers to her first given that JKR has much greater reach and influence.

There's no way it can be Molly. Nope. Definitely not.

But it couldn't possibly be Molly if this is a serious claim...

... And the GLP think it's a serious claim.

Yes, every day's a school day on MN!

Can you quote or link to support your claims?

That spin is a very dangerous spin to take if one is regulated by any of the legal professions.

One could even find oneself being asked to explain why one choose to or allowed ones organisation to bringing the profession into disrepute by making claims which would undermine Jo Public's perception of the legal profession and the BSBs ability to correctly apply disciplinary action to regulate the professional members.

I don’t think that’s the only reason they are going after her. Calling a transwoman a man may upset some transwomen and may be rude but that’s not the reason she is being challenged or should she.

However lets be honest here - her continued comments and bullying ( yet it is) and harassment of certain trans individuals is the reason.

Its one thing to have a different opinion but another to actively target a certain group and individuals which she has.

For a person in her professional position it is unacceptable. I’m sorry to say she deserves everything that comes with being hateful and intolerant.

@RedToothBrush It's supposedly someone that has already reported Sarah to the BSB previously, and had both the complaint and the review rejected.

Plus there's an allusion to 'big shoes to fill' - we all know who has giant shoes.

It simply doesn't make sense unless Molly is into public humiliation.

You saw THAT photo, right?

If it is Weddell, then the GLP are more stupid / desperate / clueless than one could imagine - unless, as @MyAmpleSheep suggests, it's to try and claim that the BSB are biased, and of course it keeps the grift going.

It's a win-win for the GLP (in their own minds, at least). If they lose the case they have more propaganda they can spin because even the BSB is biased against them so how can they get justice ever, anywhere?

I don't think it could possibly be Molly....

This is Molly's track record.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5169517-5169517-sparkles-vs-councilor-laurie-burton?page=1

The attempt to intimidate Councillor Burton who commented on public photos of Molly on social media half naked wearing nipple clamps (that Molly had posted himself so clearly absolutely fine with self image if you go posting photos of yourself like this for all to see, ESPECIALLY if you regard yourself as female)

Then there was the cease and desist letter to Fred Sergeant mentioned on the abuse thread.

Somehow after that Molly managed to continue to leave the house in April this year, to protest against JKR, after this...

...using a loud hailer in front of a large crowd dressed in 'Hogwarts uniform' calling to take a shit on JKR and for her to be arrested, which was widely shared on social media.

https://x.com/Sorelle_Arduino/status/1914225795389677850?t=DGgl3vRihwWWOKh_K2nc3Q&s=19

And then this month Molly has been out and about without problems shopping at M&S.

Remember this is what Sarah Phillimore says the claim is:
XX describes an “onslaught” of abuse she has received online, which she says has been led by you. She says that the abuse wears people down, preventing others from getting involved in the discussion about trans rights. Transphobic hate “shattered her confidence, particularly around her appearance, and left her too scared to leave the house for weeks” and led XX to attempt to take her own life.

From March 2024 to August 2025, you wrote more than 50 posts across multiple social media platforms referring to XX, “usually in derogatory terms.”

You repeatedly misgendered, deadnamed and shared photos of XX and used graphic language about her genitals.

And it couldn't be Molly because for someone who hasnt been able to leave the house for weeks and doesn't like others talking about his gentials, having above mentioned photos freely available on social media without privacy settings and then shopping for bras on social media and then protesting with a loud hailer during the same time period isn't really going to hold up well in court (or with the DWP) is it? It doesn't really seem consistent with the claim does it?

The GLP would be nuts to go with a claim that has such high stakes for naming transwomen men with Molly who has gone out of his way to seek public attention.

So I have to dispute the suggestion that it's Molly bringing the claim. It simply doesn't make sense unless Molly is into public humiliation.

Does it?
🤔

Same here!

I <almost> reposted a post about the EHRC taking action against public bodies not following the SC judgment earlier. But changed my mind!

I wonder how easy it is for anyone involved with the GLP to say "sorry I don't think you have a case" in a situation like this?

And how can he be a journalist when he can barely string two coherent sentences together?

Bloody hell, not him. They really are ridiculous.

Does Sophie Molly get paid for his "journalism"? As far as I know, he is on disability benefits so he can devote himself to harassing women full time.

Isn't this case just a way of getting the contents of the GLP coffers into Joylon and other's pockets?

Was it not a “boob fit”?

That would have be a funny court case (if the BSB decided to wade in on what pronouns cant be used to defend or present a case)

Also busy telling everyone that he’s going to be ignoring the EHRC statutory guidance and will continue to use women’s single sex spaces.

Is that person not busy with their “bra fit” and gloating over holding up a huge M&S bag?

I think Naomi Cunningham recently had some complaints against her for misgendering etc rejected by the BSB (and she only knew about them when they were rejected). She posted about it on LinkedIn (where I am fan girl following her, which is the closest to outing myself as GC as I currently feel brave enough to do...).

Not sure SM stood “outside” them