Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Wood burner ban...

484 replies

BusyGreySnail · 12/11/2026 16:16

Apparently there is a call for wood burners to be banned. They are bad for air quality, inside and out, and bad for the environment. I assume it's the same for fireplaces, but I don't know.

What about all this talk of black outs, and vulnerable critical infastructure and preparedness, should that factor in? If we really are at risk, people having an alternative source of heat is quite a good idea.

Do you have one?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
OakAndEmber47 · 13/11/2026 17:16

I think the argument against wood burning is a little too simplistic. Yes, burning wood produces emissions, and I’m not suggesting modern smoke-control stoves are pollution-free. But they are considerably more efficient than open fires, particularly when burning properly seasoned wood.

I live in a rural area and most of my firewood is sourced locally. Trees that have fallen, died or needed removing anyway. I’m not cutting down healthy trees to fuel my fire.

Wood is a renewable resource, and unlike fossil fuels, it’s part of a natural carbon cycle. There’s also something to be said for using a local resource rather than transporting and importing fuel from elsewhere.

I can understand tighter restrictions in densely populated places like London, where air quality is a very different consideration. But does it really make sense to apply the same restrictions to someone in the countryside burning properly seasoned, locally sourced wood in a modern stove?

Surely context matters. I’m not arguing that wood burning has no environmental impact, just that it shouldn’t automatically be treated as environmentally irresponsible.

GreenAppleCart · 13/11/2026 17:27

Ban them in urban areas. No excuse. If we’re in a situation where people who have wood burners use the excuse they’re worried about mass power cuts and days without means of heating we’ve got bigger issues as a country (and then are we saying it’s alright for anyone who doesn’t have one to freeze/starve?).

In rural areas I can see more of an argument. I think if you live in a village and have a central gas heating system of some sort it’s really not necessary and think those should be banned still tbh. But if you live in the middle of nowhere and it’s your only/main heating supply I would make an exception for that to any ban.

for those blathering on about how they’re not actually that polluting if you have it installed and maintained and using the correct wood well honestly, I imagine you are in the minority. And even in this example it’s still an unnecessary pollutant. I find it incredibly selfish to use one in urban areas. I can always tell when one house on my jogging route has it on because I can smell the horrible fumes before I see them coming out of their chimney. It’s only one house but it stinks up the entire street. We don’t have smoking indoors anymore but people are allowed to pump out that much toxic air pollution is laughable. Even worse if your neighbour has one as then you can’t even avoid it inside your own home if your windows etc are open or every time you step outside.

people who have woodburners for the aesthetic without caring about the poulltion it’s chucking out to neighbours and their wider community make me despair out of sheer ignorance, selfishness, or both. No one needs a wood burner for heat in urban areas.

christmas tree argument is ridiculous. It’s not impacting people outside of your own house. I don’t have a choice which streets I walk down (or am I meant to walk massively out of my way to avoid it, difficult if there’s multiple streets with woodburners).

would 100% support a full ban on these, with small exemptions given for genuinely rural houses “off grid” without other heating options/means.

PrettyLittleRose · 13/11/2026 17:38

GiveMeOodlesofPoodles · 13/11/2026 15:15

If you think they are hard work, and too much faff then you don't have to have one.

Some people like them, and dont consider it too much work or faff at all. We dont ever find ourselves wasting wood lighting a fire just to keep the chimney clear. It is cold enough often enough in the Winter to light one anyway.

Edited

Thanks for telling me I don't have to have one. I didn't know that. I thought they were mandatory. Good job you're here to educate me. 🙄

PrettyLittleRose · 13/11/2026 17:39

@GreenAppleCart 100% agree with your post up there. ^

GasPanic · 13/11/2026 18:07

GreenAppleCart · 13/11/2026 17:27

Ban them in urban areas. No excuse. If we’re in a situation where people who have wood burners use the excuse they’re worried about mass power cuts and days without means of heating we’ve got bigger issues as a country (and then are we saying it’s alright for anyone who doesn’t have one to freeze/starve?).

In rural areas I can see more of an argument. I think if you live in a village and have a central gas heating system of some sort it’s really not necessary and think those should be banned still tbh. But if you live in the middle of nowhere and it’s your only/main heating supply I would make an exception for that to any ban.

for those blathering on about how they’re not actually that polluting if you have it installed and maintained and using the correct wood well honestly, I imagine you are in the minority. And even in this example it’s still an unnecessary pollutant. I find it incredibly selfish to use one in urban areas. I can always tell when one house on my jogging route has it on because I can smell the horrible fumes before I see them coming out of their chimney. It’s only one house but it stinks up the entire street. We don’t have smoking indoors anymore but people are allowed to pump out that much toxic air pollution is laughable. Even worse if your neighbour has one as then you can’t even avoid it inside your own home if your windows etc are open or every time you step outside.

people who have woodburners for the aesthetic without caring about the poulltion it’s chucking out to neighbours and their wider community make me despair out of sheer ignorance, selfishness, or both. No one needs a wood burner for heat in urban areas.

christmas tree argument is ridiculous. It’s not impacting people outside of your own house. I don’t have a choice which streets I walk down (or am I meant to walk massively out of my way to avoid it, difficult if there’s multiple streets with woodburners).

would 100% support a full ban on these, with small exemptions given for genuinely rural houses “off grid” without other heating options/means.

Or alternatively we could just insist that everyone who has one has to have a cat installed/particulate filter.

Pretty much in the same way we did with cars to stop them wrecking the environment.

OakAndEmber47 · 13/11/2026 18:10

GreenAppleCart · 13/11/2026 17:27

Ban them in urban areas. No excuse. If we’re in a situation where people who have wood burners use the excuse they’re worried about mass power cuts and days without means of heating we’ve got bigger issues as a country (and then are we saying it’s alright for anyone who doesn’t have one to freeze/starve?).

In rural areas I can see more of an argument. I think if you live in a village and have a central gas heating system of some sort it’s really not necessary and think those should be banned still tbh. But if you live in the middle of nowhere and it’s your only/main heating supply I would make an exception for that to any ban.

for those blathering on about how they’re not actually that polluting if you have it installed and maintained and using the correct wood well honestly, I imagine you are in the minority. And even in this example it’s still an unnecessary pollutant. I find it incredibly selfish to use one in urban areas. I can always tell when one house on my jogging route has it on because I can smell the horrible fumes before I see them coming out of their chimney. It’s only one house but it stinks up the entire street. We don’t have smoking indoors anymore but people are allowed to pump out that much toxic air pollution is laughable. Even worse if your neighbour has one as then you can’t even avoid it inside your own home if your windows etc are open or every time you step outside.

people who have woodburners for the aesthetic without caring about the poulltion it’s chucking out to neighbours and their wider community make me despair out of sheer ignorance, selfishness, or both. No one needs a wood burner for heat in urban areas.

christmas tree argument is ridiculous. It’s not impacting people outside of your own house. I don’t have a choice which streets I walk down (or am I meant to walk massively out of my way to avoid it, difficult if there’s multiple streets with woodburners).

would 100% support a full ban on these, with small exemptions given for genuinely rural houses “off grid” without other heating options/means.

I think there are more oil heated houses than people would imagine. Lots of rural areas are off mains gas.

rereturner · 13/11/2026 18:12

I live in an urban area and have one - but we don’t burn fuel on it as it exacerbates dh’s asthma and other health issues, despite being a defra exempt one meant to be better for pollutants.

Instead of burning wood I keep flicker flame fairy lights and a few blocks of wood in it to give a realistic looking glowing fire. We don’t need the heat as central heating is enough it’s just nice to look at.

We do keep the chimney swept and now with the prepping advice on the news we are going to stock up on some logs and I’m glad we have it as a potential heating back up if the worst does happen

SnowflakesandSlippers · 13/11/2026 18:22

GreenAppleCart · 13/11/2026 17:27

Ban them in urban areas. No excuse. If we’re in a situation where people who have wood burners use the excuse they’re worried about mass power cuts and days without means of heating we’ve got bigger issues as a country (and then are we saying it’s alright for anyone who doesn’t have one to freeze/starve?).

In rural areas I can see more of an argument. I think if you live in a village and have a central gas heating system of some sort it’s really not necessary and think those should be banned still tbh. But if you live in the middle of nowhere and it’s your only/main heating supply I would make an exception for that to any ban.

for those blathering on about how they’re not actually that polluting if you have it installed and maintained and using the correct wood well honestly, I imagine you are in the minority. And even in this example it’s still an unnecessary pollutant. I find it incredibly selfish to use one in urban areas. I can always tell when one house on my jogging route has it on because I can smell the horrible fumes before I see them coming out of their chimney. It’s only one house but it stinks up the entire street. We don’t have smoking indoors anymore but people are allowed to pump out that much toxic air pollution is laughable. Even worse if your neighbour has one as then you can’t even avoid it inside your own home if your windows etc are open or every time you step outside.

people who have woodburners for the aesthetic without caring about the poulltion it’s chucking out to neighbours and their wider community make me despair out of sheer ignorance, selfishness, or both. No one needs a wood burner for heat in urban areas.

christmas tree argument is ridiculous. It’s not impacting people outside of your own house. I don’t have a choice which streets I walk down (or am I meant to walk massively out of my way to avoid it, difficult if there’s multiple streets with woodburners).

would 100% support a full ban on these, with small exemptions given for genuinely rural houses “off grid” without other heating options/means.

Codswallop!

AmnesiacDream · 13/11/2026 18:36

DoubleHellos · 13/11/2026 17:12

Don't be ridiculous. I am nothing like those companies!

I am saying (and I note that no one has linked to the research that says children living with a wood burner are exposed to the same risks as those living with smokers) that there is a clear difference between attributing the death of someone hit and killed by a car to the car that hit them, and attributing the death of a 90 something who had dementia and copd to their exposure to a wood burner. It is tenuous, hypothetical, extrapolated and does not detail the weighting given to potential other causes.

That does not make me like a multi national company peddling carcinogens to the most vulnerable.

"attributing the death of a 90 something who had dementia and copd to their exposure to a wood burner. It is tenuous, hypothetical, extrapolated and does not detail the weighting given to potential other causes."

I said you sound like the cigarette companies, not that you are like them. This is exactly the sort of argument the cigarette companies made.

I haven't claimed that any individual death should be attributed to wood burning stove smoke. I'm talking about population level causes of death. And traffic accident deaths at a population level and deaths from wood burning smoke pollution at a population level is something we can compare.

FOJN · 13/11/2026 18:42

GasPanic · 13/11/2026 18:07

Or alternatively we could just insist that everyone who has one has to have a cat installed/particulate filter.

Pretty much in the same way we did with cars to stop them wrecking the environment.

Road transport is still the leading cause of PM 2.5 particle pollution. Mainly from brakes, tyres and road wear, not things a particulate filter can deal with. I doubt the people so concerned about wood burners would be as eager to give up their cars to reduce air pollution. They'd all have jolly good reasons why a car was essential but refuse to accept that wood burners are an essential source of reliable heat for many people.

I find it fascinating that people can convince themselves their way of life is the default "normal" and completely blameless and anyone who doesn't live like them is wrong and just not trying hard enough to be more like them as if it's something to aspire to.

HappyAutumnRed · 13/11/2026 18:49

Tricksortreats · 12/11/2026 17:27

My neighbours have theirs lit and spewing smoke for 18 hours a day. So we can't open any windows except by getting up at 4 in the morning to air the house. The conservatory and the garden are both unusable for 7 months of the year. No doubt we're breathing in lots of smoke even with the windows shut, and certainly lots gets in if we open the front door.
Most people don't give a toss about the climate or other people's health, once it comes down to anything they actually like - in particular wood burners and holidays.

Apparently one wood burner is the same, in terms of pollution, as 60 lorries. More air pollution is caused by wood burners than by all the UK's road transport.

But people would still rather see their children die of lung disease or cancer than get rid of them.

You have my sympathy as my neighbour is the same. They have it on October - April each year, from 6.30am until 11pm. We can never open windows.

Even worse, it’s from a single storey extension roof so is metres away from our bedroom windows. The legal requirement for distance from windows is way too small I believe.

Because the chimney is lower than the houses, the smoke and smell gets trapped at low levels a lot so the smell is awful.

Funnily enough, the neighbour has an awful hacking couch, which started up again this year at the same time they started the burner….. Not sure why they don’t see the pattern each year!

Gettingbysomehow · 13/11/2026 19:06

I wont have one in this house because the neighbours in the cul de sac are anti woodburner and you have to keep the peace when you live in a small row of houses.
But when I retire Im going back to a detached house away from other people and Ill get a small one.
I had one before and it was great but I only ever burnt very dry seasoned wood. Never coal and never sappy wood.

climbintheback · 13/11/2026 19:08

Morso squirrel are perfect!

Wincher · 13/11/2026 19:15

We live in London and in our last house we installed one maybe 8-10 years ago. I did love it but tbh it wasn’t often cold enough to need it and I was increasingly bothered by the environment and health concerns. We moved house last year and I wouldn’t put one in now. But I do think if you live in the countryside they are definitely worth having

330ml · 13/11/2026 19:21

Wincher · 13/11/2026 19:15

We live in London and in our last house we installed one maybe 8-10 years ago. I did love it but tbh it wasn’t often cold enough to need it and I was increasingly bothered by the environment and health concerns. We moved house last year and I wouldn’t put one in now. But I do think if you live in the countryside they are definitely worth having

Isn’t most of London a smokeless zone? How do people get away with fitting log burning stoves? Are they exempt?

CombatBarbie · 13/11/2026 19:29

Meadowfinch · 13/11/2026 12:07

There is the same issue with some new houses built near us. The cost of the power needed to run a heat pump is so high, they've had log burners installed.

I'm not sure what the developers are doing wrong.

Not setting the boiler to water law is the main culprit and using underfloor heating instead of radiators.

Truinio · 13/11/2026 20:14

FOJN · 13/11/2026 18:42

Road transport is still the leading cause of PM 2.5 particle pollution. Mainly from brakes, tyres and road wear, not things a particulate filter can deal with. I doubt the people so concerned about wood burners would be as eager to give up their cars to reduce air pollution. They'd all have jolly good reasons why a car was essential but refuse to accept that wood burners are an essential source of reliable heat for many people.

I find it fascinating that people can convince themselves their way of life is the default "normal" and completely blameless and anyone who doesn't live like them is wrong and just not trying hard enough to be more like them as if it's something to aspire to.

Quite. I’m sure all those people are happy to burn gas imported from the US or Qatar or God knows where, but using a locally sourced, renewable, carbon neutral fuel apparently makes us environmental pariahs.

Papyrophile · 13/11/2026 20:15

For the record urban MNetters, there are a lot of people living in rural areas that are not connected to mains gas. The fuel menu for heating your home is electricity, oil or wood/coal. Of those options, firewood is the best and most sustainable option. Electricity is too costly, especially with the green loaded tariffs, unless you live in a new build PassivHaus. The oil price is volatile. The cost in December 2025 was roughly 50p per litre, and it was £1.30 pl when I refilled my tank four weeks ago. It's down to about 0.98ppl again, and if there's peace in the Middle East it will settle at a lower rate. But in all the waffle about helping with the cost of living, no politician has offered any help at all to households who rely on oil heating.

BeLemonMoose · 13/11/2026 21:41

I am amazed at the amount of parents wanting to argue to keep harming their childrens health

Blackoutmaybe · 13/11/2026 21:51

BeLemonMoose · 13/11/2026 21:41

I am amazed at the amount of parents wanting to argue to keep harming their childrens health

As per my previous post, we live very rurally and are on oil. We woke up this morning, the coldest night of the year, to no central heating or hot water. Our new, very efficient and DEFRA approved wood burner is very much beneficial for our DCs health in that scenario, thanks. Not everyone lives in a city, with neighbours and mains gas.

Additup · 13/11/2026 22:19

BeLemonMoose · 13/11/2026 21:41

I am amazed at the amount of parents wanting to argue to keep harming their childrens health

If it's any consolation our 3 children all grew up with open fires and a woodburner. They're all adults now and none of them have respiratory issues.

DoubleHellos · 13/11/2026 22:21

BeLemonMoose · 13/11/2026 21:41

I am amazed at the amount of parents wanting to argue to keep harming their childrens health

I am amazed at the inability of posters here to understand that children living in a freezing cold and damp home with no heating are at more risk of immediate harm than those living in a cosy and snug home with wood burner blazing....

climbintheback · 13/11/2026 22:33

What on earth is the focal point in your lounge when you haven’t got a beautiful cosy woodburner?

tinyspiny · 13/11/2026 22:45

Additup · 13/11/2026 22:19

If it's any consolation our 3 children all grew up with open fires and a woodburner. They're all adults now and none of them have respiratory issues.

How old are they , my emphysema , most likely caused by second hand smoke /open fires as a child didn’t cause me any issues until I was diagnosed aged 50 . I’ve never smoked / vaped and never had open fires /a wood burner as an adult .

MotherPuppr · 13/11/2026 22:46

LiberteLynx · 12/11/2026 16:36

I cannot wait for the ban. I think they can ban them except for during blackouts.
So many people have them due to the skyrocketing energy prices that I cannot burp the house without it filling with the smell of woodsmoke. It also makes it near impossible for me to walk with my friend when she walks her dog as it triggers my asthma.

"burp the house" ? This is the cutest thing ever 😭

Swipe left for the next trending thread