Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Wood burner ban...

481 replies

BusyGreySnail · 12/11/2026 16:16

Apparently there is a call for wood burners to be banned. They are bad for air quality, inside and out, and bad for the environment. I assume it's the same for fireplaces, but I don't know.

What about all this talk of black outs, and vulnerable critical infastructure and preparedness, should that factor in? If we really are at risk, people having an alternative source of heat is quite a good idea.

Do you have one?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
allmycats · 12/11/2026 16:47

Try living very rurally with no gas supply and knowing that with each storm/very high winds you’re 75% likely to loose your electricity and then you will be able to make an informed decision about woodburners.

Lasttraintolondon · 12/11/2026 16:47

I love them and I'm so glad to have my own form of heating that doesn't rely on the national grid in any way. I use my own wood from the garden so it's carbon neutral too.

Mumsnet loves a ban. Something for you to reflect upon... It's all very well banning things YOU hate, fireworks, woodburners, dogs in parks etc. One day someone might decide the thing you enjoy is worthy of a ban, so a little tolerance and live and let live goes a long way.

Lirch · 12/11/2026 16:47

A 2020 systematic review in Lancet Global Healthfound that indoor air pollution, including domestic wood burning, was associated with heart and lung disease, lung cancer, strokes, stillbirth, and asthma.4 Lighting fires at home is a major source of small “particulate matter” that can enter the bloodstream and be transported around the body, lodging in the heart, brain, and other organs.

Quoted from a BMJ article this March 26. No way would I choose to have one in my home.

NoNonsense79 · 12/11/2026 16:47

I live rurally and my power regularly goes out. When that happens my wood burner is my sole source of heat and cooking ability. I’m not in mains gas. So no, I would not agree with a blanket ban and I think it shows a lack of understanding of life out of the city if you think it’s reasonable to ban them outright. I’m comfortable with there being strict restrictions in built up areas with mains gas and secure electric supply, something based in building regs and planning rules perhaps.

Everygoodnameisgone · 12/11/2026 16:47

I love my woodburner. The government would love us all to be dependent on gas and electricity companies for our heating. I don't trust anything they or the WHO tells us.

LiberteLynx · 12/11/2026 16:48

Blackoutmaybe · 12/11/2026 16:45

They aren’t being banned though? The type of fuel you can burn in a Smoke Control Area must be approved and you must use a modern, defra approved appliance, which all are anyway since 2022. There are no plans to ban wood burners completely, anywhere, as far as I know.

Thank you, I did not realise the ban was really regulation of wood burners. I may need to look into air purifiers and comfortable masks to wear outside.

Holeymoley28 · 12/11/2026 16:48

I think if anything we should be building more homes with fires / log burners. With the energy crisis and risks of not having enough power it’s only sensible to have a way to heat your home.

Our house has the chimneys from the old coal fires and I won’t be closing them up they won’t be in action this year but hopefully next year we will have them all cleaned up and ready to work.

If we how no power your boiler won’t work so no heating. But those with fire places and log burners will be toasty.

ThePeppyOpalScroller · 12/11/2026 16:48

computerquays · 12/11/2026 16:33

I do find it odd that Mnetters in general are quite climate conscious but wood burners seem to be the exception.

That's because they arent bad for the environment. It's a sustainable fuel, and is only required for a few months of the year, unlike gas and electricity which are needed all year round.

Travellingshoes · 12/11/2026 16:49

People on MN aren’t eco-conscious, the amount of airplane travels people discuss is unbelievable.

I can’t wait to try out our (smoke free or what) woodburner and will get it cleaned in case there is an electricity outage as our house would be freezing.

WitchesBritches · 12/11/2026 16:50

underthehawthorntree · 12/11/2026 16:44

People seem to forget that almost everything we do in a day has some form of negative effect- every biscuit, every hour sat on our arses scrolling, every time we get in the car and risking death, every glass of wine. If we eliminate all pleasure from life what's the bloody point?! We might live a bit longer but we would be miserable! Most people enjoy siting by the fire and it has the added benefit of keeping us warm. Bad for the environment probably but possibly not worse than burning fossil fuels to heat our homes and definitely not worse than all the climate pollution caused by data centres and war.

👏 well said!!

I don't have one, but I would love one, well actually I would love an open fire, but that's not possible in this house.

WhosGotTheKeysToMyBimma · 12/11/2026 16:50

If you're rural and don't have mains gas I get it. Everywhere else they are deeply antisocial in my opinion. Owners of then are fine, it's the poor buggers who have to breathe in the air polluted by their smoke!

I had to cut my run short yesterday evening, I don't have asthma but the smoke really affects my breathing. This time of year is a real lottery for air quality round here. Loads of ppl in big fancy houses belching out woodsmoke. Vile.

Additup · 12/11/2026 16:50

Blackoutmaybe · 12/11/2026 16:45

They aren’t being banned though? The type of fuel you can burn in a Smoke Control Area must be approved and you must use a modern, defra approved appliance, which all are anyway since 2022. There are no plans to ban wood burners completely, anywhere, as far as I know.

Of course there aren't. Its just the annual autumn thread about banning woodburners 😂

ohtowinthelottery · 12/11/2026 16:50

Having endured a 4 day power cut with no heating following a storm one November, i won't be getting rid of my log burner any time soon. We did have an open fire previously but replaced it with a stove.

Lasttraintolondon · 12/11/2026 16:51

Lirch · 12/11/2026 16:47

A 2020 systematic review in Lancet Global Healthfound that indoor air pollution, including domestic wood burning, was associated with heart and lung disease, lung cancer, strokes, stillbirth, and asthma.4 Lighting fires at home is a major source of small “particulate matter” that can enter the bloodstream and be transported around the body, lodging in the heart, brain, and other organs.

Quoted from a BMJ article this March 26. No way would I choose to have one in my home.

And yet you probably eat strawberries which are covered in the forever chemical PFAS. I really wonder how mumsnet picks it's targets. Loads of people can't afford heating and you want to ban the one thing people can do to heat their house on their own.

Pfas reference below because I know someone will ask.

https://www.pan-europe.info/resources/reports/2026/07/european-strawberries-extensively-contaminated-pfas-or-endocrine

European strawberries extensively contaminated with PFAS or endocrine disrupting pesticide residues

Strawberries are among the most popular fruits in Europe. Europeans’ strawberry consumption is high, and production has increased over the last decade in several countries. Strawberries are considered as healthy fruits for their vitamin C and antioxida...

https://www.pan-europe.info/resources/reports/2026/07/european-strawberries-extensively-contaminated-pfas-or-endocrine

AyeupDuck · 12/11/2026 16:52

Well smog from pollution killed loads of people in London in the 1950’s with coal and wood from fires making it a lot worse when there was a type of cold anti cyclone. It’s outlined in an episode of The Crown and really awful to watch.

So no I wouldn’t have one and anyone who bangs on about net zero needs to think about this.

computerquays · 12/11/2026 16:53

@ThePeppyOpalScrollerIve read they are bad for the environment 🤷🏻‍♀️

BusyGreySnail · 12/11/2026 16:54

I don't really get the "other things are bad too" argument for not banning something. Forever chemicals should definitely be banned. I am - personally - on the fence, but it's been eye opening to read that so many people are impacted by it by just walking (or running!) past a house burning wood.

OP posts:
ChapmanFarm · 12/11/2026 16:55

You can come here then where there is no gas supply and see how you cope without one.

That said I don't think they are necessary in built up areas.

They could not ban them without better infrastructure.

computerquays · 12/11/2026 16:55

Loads of people can't afford heating and you want to ban the one thing people can do to heat their house on their own I thought they were more common in affluent households

BusyGreySnail · 12/11/2026 16:55

I also don't know how you can say something isn't bad for the environment but does pollute. Pollution is inherently bad for the environment surely.

OP posts:
Additup · 12/11/2026 16:56

Lirch · 12/11/2026 16:47

A 2020 systematic review in Lancet Global Healthfound that indoor air pollution, including domestic wood burning, was associated with heart and lung disease, lung cancer, strokes, stillbirth, and asthma.4 Lighting fires at home is a major source of small “particulate matter” that can enter the bloodstream and be transported around the body, lodging in the heart, brain, and other organs.

Quoted from a BMJ article this March 26. No way would I choose to have one in my home.

If this is the case why aren't heart and lung disease, lung cancer, strokes, stillbirth, and asthma all really high in nordic countries where woodburners are much more commonplace than in the UK?

BusyGreySnail · 12/11/2026 16:57

Additup · 12/11/2026 16:56

If this is the case why aren't heart and lung disease, lung cancer, strokes, stillbirth, and asthma all really high in nordic countries where woodburners are much more commonplace than in the UK?

I wonder this too. Basically every house has one (if not more) in places like Norway.

OP posts:
LiberteLynx · 12/11/2026 16:58

Loads of people can't afford heating and you want to ban the one thing people can do to heat their house on their own.

Wood is not free unless you are rich enough to own a forest and can cut down trees yourself.

A small net bag of firewood that would last maybe two hours to heat 1 room is selling for £6 at my local co-op last I looked.

£3/hr for heat is not very affordable.

Mama2many73 · 12/11/2026 16:58

Froughties · 12/11/2026 16:38

I hate them but dh wants one. I've recently got a few quotes due to this whole prepper situation. As a pp said living rurally I now feel it makes sense to get one in case of emergency. Currently have a gas fire that we probably switch on twice a year. I imagine the log burner would be similar. Are we made to get one? Just for occasional use and emergencies? Not too many neighbours and I think they have them anyway.

Rurally you are more likely to be inconvenienced by longer blackout/energy issues as it can be harder for crews to reach where they need ro be. I can see how important that warmth would be in those situations and would be tempted to get one for that reason alone.

As a kid (I'm 55) we didnt get central heating, (storage heaters as DM refused to have gas ) until I.was about 18yrs old. Single glazed windows would bw running with condensation or frozen solid if cold enough but once the coal fire was on it heated all the rooms including the bedrooms from the heat in the chimney.

Holeymoley28 · 12/11/2026 17:00

computerquays · 12/11/2026 16:55

Loads of people can't afford heating and you want to ban the one thing people can do to heat their house on their own I thought they were more common in affluent households

Most council houses used to have them as standard. The house I’m in currently is ex council and has l two fire places.

The house I grew up in was council and had one.

Swipe left for the next trending thread