Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A little piece of insight

1000 replies

Tandora · 02/10/2025 13:48

Into a topic so woefully misunderstood.

A little piece of insight
OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:50

BaseDrops · 03/10/2025 13:49

If I ask a medical professional for a female medical professional and they send a male of any variety what happens after that is entirely the responsibility of the person who ignored biological facts and included a male in the female category.

This. I would be making a complaint and citing FWS v Scottish Ministers.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:51

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:49

It's clear. Upton would understand exactly what you meant. If she chose to attend to you anyway she would be crossing a boundary.

He would, yes.

ThatCyanCat · 03/10/2025 13:51

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:46

You said you wanted words that made it clear that you wanted to be seen by a female doctor - not including trans women.

I provided you with those words; it's very easy to describe that preference in words.

But you're suggesting words that mean transwomen aren't women, and aren't female, and that it's ok to make the distinction and sometimes to exclude them because they aren't female or women. After all, if Upton is a biological female woman, then on what grounds can he be excluded from female care?

That's very transphobic. Especially since, if it's ok for one woman to exclude transwomen from her intimate space because they do not count as women or female for that context, it must also be ok to create larger intimate spaces that exclude transwomen for the same reason.

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:51

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:50

It’s not clear, and it’s not up to you how I communicate my wishes 🤷‍♀️

It's perfectly clear.

It's certainly not up to me how you communicate your wishes. You are free to be as rude, offensive and hurtful as you like.

I am free to point out that your words are rude, offensive, hurtful and unnecessary.

Anyway, as I said engaging with you is playing in the mud. Not the aim of this thread.

OP posts:
JamieCannister · 03/10/2025 13:52

ThatCyanCat · 03/10/2025 13:32

Tandora, you have an opportunity here to educate us. If we need a female doctor, what language should we use? Fife made it clear that if we ask for a woman, we get Upton and if we ask for a female, we get Upton, and if we ask for a biological woman, we get Upton.

So if, as you said earlier, you recognise there are biological differences and what matters is using the right language - what language should we use?

"Actual woman" is one option.

"Woman of the sex classed that birthed literally every fucking person who has ever been born" might be another.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:52

I am free to clarify that a man who identifies as a woman is not to treat me, along with all other male doctors, yes.

Taztoy · 03/10/2025 13:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Yes.

I would be deeply upset if I asked for a female clinician and someone like Dr Upton (who we are told is biologically female) attended.

Dr Upton would be deeply upset that I was deeply upset that I did not perceive Dr Upton to be biologically female and Dr Upton would feel that as a biological female Dr Upton met the definition of “female” when I had requested a female clinician.

Why does Dr Upton get to attend in those circumstances when Dr Upton is not a biological female?

defrazzled · 03/10/2025 13:53

Transgender ideology is the only mental illness where we're all expected to indulge the person suffering the illness' delusions. The sooner we stop, the better.

I was anorexic for 3 years, thank fuck no one told me I WAS fat and needed to starve myself. I'd be dead. The distress is real but the solution is truth and support, not access to women's spaces.

soupycustard · 03/10/2025 13:54

I am loath to be dragged down into rudeness, but this is just getting sillier and sillier: so now the OP is suggesting that if someone wants a female doctor, they should ask for a 'female doctor' and then specify that they aren't comfortable with a 'transwoman'.
But apparently no one knows what 'female' really means and trans identified males like Dr Upton are actually biological females, therefore presumably not 'transwomen' (a transwoman being someone of the male sex who considers themself of a female gender).
So if a male is actually a biological female, what is a 'transwoman'? There's no need for transing at all is there.

ThatCyanCat · 03/10/2025 13:54

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:47

Um nice try. What would be deeply upsetting and offensive is the use of these words:

"a male doctor, of any kind, obviously including those men who call themselves “trans women”."

They are male, though.

What's the difference between "a male, like a transwoman" and "a person who isn't female, like a transwoman"?

Kucinghitam · 03/10/2025 13:55

Are we narrowing down a list of words that do have a definition? "Upsetting" "offensive" "obscene" "clear" "rude" "unnecessary" "hurtful" "mud" seem to be solid.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:55

Taztoy · 03/10/2025 13:52

Yes.

I would be deeply upset if I asked for a female clinician and someone like Dr Upton (who we are told is biologically female) attended.

Dr Upton would be deeply upset that I was deeply upset that I did not perceive Dr Upton to be biologically female and Dr Upton would feel that as a biological female Dr Upton met the definition of “female” when I had requested a female clinician.

Why does Dr Upton get to attend in those circumstances when Dr Upton is not a biological female?

Dr Upton expressed that he would in fact feel free to attend in those circumstances, because he believes himself to meet the criteria of “biological female”.

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:56

Taztoy · 03/10/2025 13:52

Yes.

I would be deeply upset if I asked for a female clinician and someone like Dr Upton (who we are told is biologically female) attended.

Dr Upton would be deeply upset that I was deeply upset that I did not perceive Dr Upton to be biologically female and Dr Upton would feel that as a biological female Dr Upton met the definition of “female” when I had requested a female clinician.

Why does Dr Upton get to attend in those circumstances when Dr Upton is not a biological female?

Dr Upton doesn't "get to attend". You have the right to request she doesn't attend to you.

The question was 'how can I make it clear I don't want Dr. Upton to attend'. I suggested language to do so that would be clear.
Another poster said she wouldn't use that language, she would use alternative language. i pointed out that her alternative language would be received by many as unnecessary and offensive.

OP posts:
Taztoy · 03/10/2025 13:57

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:55

Dr Upton expressed that he would in fact feel free to attend in those circumstances, because he believes himself to meet the criteria of “biological female”.

That was my understanding too.

@Tandora can you clarify if you think Dr Upton would qualify to attend in the circumstances where I asked for a female clinician?

Greyskybluesky · 03/10/2025 13:57

This entire thread is nothing more than social science theorising by the OP in their comfortable, unthreatening academic/research bubble.

The OP clearly has little experience of working with women in the real world. I'm talking about the tough, difficult, often unpleasant real world.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 13:57

Why should anyone have to tell Upton to his face that they don’t want him when it should have been communicated by the word “female”?

Taztoy · 03/10/2025 13:58

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:56

Dr Upton doesn't "get to attend". You have the right to request she doesn't attend to you.

The question was 'how can I make it clear I don't want Dr. Upton to attend'. I suggested language to do so that would be clear.
Another poster said she wouldn't use that language, she would use alternative language. i pointed out that her alternative language would be received by many as unnecessary and offensive.

Edited

I would say

I wish to be attended by a female doctor.

If I asked that, would you think it was appropriate for Dr Upton to attend me?

Deadringer · 03/10/2025 13:59

MrsTerryPratchett · 02/10/2025 14:20

This. The distress may very well be real. The treatment for that isn’t allowing grown men into women’s spaces.

Amen

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:00

“A little piece of insight” indeed.

JamieCannister · 03/10/2025 14:00

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:49

It's clear. Upton would understand exactly what you meant. If she chose to attend to you anyway she would be crossing a boundary.

I listened to that Tribunal hearing and as far as I am concerned I heard a man say he would completely ignore the boundaries of women, ignore their lack of consent, and sexually assault them if the touching of sexual organs was necessary as part of the examination.

Catiette · 03/10/2025 14:00

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:47

Um nice try. What would be deeply upsetting and offensive is the use of these words:

"a male doctor, of any kind, obviously including those men who call themselves “trans women”."

And there, right there, we see the damage I’d argue your perspective is doing to these very people you seek to protect.

Your every post is contributing to a collective sense of uncertainty and mistrust about language and trans individuals in a public health context that didn‘t ever need to exist. This isn’t the result of sudden, vicious prejudice ballooning from nowhere, but rather of your own systematic deconstruction of the words and social contracts that previously protected women‘s interests.

In shining a spotlight on trans people’s needs to the exclusion of all else, you’re driving the women left in the dark (both in the sense of utter confusion and feeling wholly unacknowledged!) to focus on and resist this exclusive (SO not inclusive) focus - when they’d really actually rather not be forced into doing this!

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:00

Taztoy · 03/10/2025 13:57

That was my understanding too.

@Tandora can you clarify if you think Dr Upton would qualify to attend in the circumstances where I asked for a female clinician?

If you ask for a 'female' doctor, Dr Upton would interpret herself as being eligible to treat you as she understands herself to be female.

If you ask for a 'female' doctor, and also specify that you are not comfortable with a trans woman, Dr Upton would understand your meaning and she would recognise that she was not eligible to treat you.

I understand that would involve the inclusion of an extra sentence - maybe seven? - more words. No doubt this is a terrible and unspeakable burden for you.

OP posts:
ThatCyanCat · 03/10/2025 14:00

If a man is going to be offended that I don't want him because he's a man, what difference does it make if I add an extra 20 redundant words (that's unnecessary!) to make the same request?

And why as a patient is that my problem?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:01

JamieCannister · 03/10/2025 14:00

I listened to that Tribunal hearing and as far as I am concerned I heard a man say he would completely ignore the boundaries of women, ignore their lack of consent, and sexually assault them if the touching of sexual organs was necessary as part of the examination.

Yep.

Kucinghitam · 03/10/2025 14:01

Does "seven" have a meaning? Asking for a friend.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread