Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #15

1000 replies

nauticant · 12/02/2025 15:50

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to continue for 2 weeks although once it was in to the second week it was looking like this would not happen. The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

However, as a result of problems with the livestreaming, apparently, as a result of a very large number of observers, remote public access to the hearing was suspended on Tuesday 11 February. It was suggested that it might be reinstated at some point but don't count on it.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse
Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2
Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3
Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4
Thread 5: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5
Thread 6: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269635-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-6
Thread 7: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5270365-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-7
Thread 8: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271511-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-8
Thread 9: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271596-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-9
Thread 10: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271723-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-10
Thread 11: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272046-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-11
Thread 12: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272276-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-12
Thread 13: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272398-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-13
Thread 14: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272939-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-14

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
KnottyAuty · 12/02/2025 22:05

FlowchartRequired · 12/02/2025 22:01

Newspapers have mostly been using the most flattering photos of Dr Upton. I have not been watching the tribunal live, so having more photos from different angles is informative.

Clothes, make-up and earrings do not maketh woman.

I did a check on the old/recent pics though and I don't think DU's had any plastic surgery as some here have alleged. So the statement about having no medical treatment is probably one of the true things

Love the username - if only Fife had followed theirs?!

Stickystickysticky · 12/02/2025 22:05

I don't think the child with anaphylaxis was being resuscitated and I don't believe any nurse would stop anyway, no matter who entered the room.

eulittleb831 · 12/02/2025 22:06

ThreeWordHarpy · 12/02/2025 22:04

You are man yourself, yes? The women of this board are well aware of the proclivities of the male sex and it is a very rare woman that has never been harassed or assaulted by a man at some point in her life. There is a hell of a lot of life experience here, you don’t need to tell us what men are like. We Know.

On this board we are held to a higher standard of posting behaviour, thanks in part to the report happy “board monitors” who like to take screen shots and tell the world how transphobic MN is. As a result we don’t speculate about the motives of someone like Dr Upton and pejorative words like “deviant” are not acceptable.

and the word cunt is? Do a search. yes, I take your point.

Nameychangington · 12/02/2025 22:06

Needspaceforlego · 12/02/2025 21:47

DU empathy - from what I've read on here never in a zillion years will that man have empathy for anyone.

Entitled, smarmy, £v#&-*!/

Well according to some doctor (possibly self-identifying, as is the style these days)

What Dr Upton is going to have is oodles of compassion and empathy from being treated like shit by society for most of her life! Likely more than most cis-females!

I fear for the observational skills of this doctor. Dr Upton has demonstrated a complete and total lack of empathy or compassion for anyone other than himself, and far from being treated like shit for most of his life, he's been traeted like a fucking emperor and has only been 'identifying as a woman' for 2 of his 28 years on this earth

https://www.reddit.com/r/doctorsUK/comments/1inpif2/patient_consent_question_is_dr_upton_correct_in/

GailBlancheViola · 12/02/2025 22:06

Nameychangington · 12/02/2025 21:17

I've made two separate complaints to the GMC about Dr Upton today.

First, that he stated under oath that he would attempt to treat a patient who asked for a female doctor, thereby acting without the patient's consent. Which is an assault.

Second, re his evidence (I'm not a man, you don't need a man and a woman to make a baby, drs make a best guess what sex a baby is etc) showing he is unfit to practice medicine as he is either a) knowingly lying under oath b) so ignorant of human biology that he really believes these things to be true or c) so mentally unwell that he has lost touch with reality and believes these things to be true. Whichever it is, he's unfit to practice.

Glad to hear that people are complaining about Upton he is bringing the entire profession into disrepute with the words that come out of his mouth, his beliefs and his behaviour. He is eroding public trust in the medical profession.

I sincerely hope that medical professionals are also reporting him, it is time they stood up to this, where were they when Sandie Peggie needed them? Where are they now, have they spoken up in support of her to NHS Fife?

First, that he stated under oath that he would attempt to treat a patient who asked for a female doctor, thereby acting without the patient's consent. Which is an assault.

Do doctors and nurses want the public, who fund the NHS, to believe this is what they would do?

The time for quivering, cowardly silence is over.

AAT65 · 12/02/2025 22:07

Needspaceforlego · 12/02/2025 21:50

Just me that thinks no matter what way this goes it will end up in the Court of Appeal?

And potentially blow all the TWAW stuff into next century? (Or I sincerely hope not put an end to single sex spaces)

One place it will never end up in is the Court of Appeal. Maybe the Inner or Outer House or the Supreme Court but I doubt Fife NHS would go that far and let's hope S P doesn't have to take it there.

NotLikeACourt · 12/02/2025 22:07

Thanks KnottyAuty - do the press get access to the bundles?

Also, this is what DU said today re that incident: so he is lying one way or the other,

DU I was busy, stressed. It was late at night. Patient safety not compromised cos I can take ob s so don't immediately need to raise it. Can't recall why I didn't raise it earlier. Perhaps I was still naively thinking it was a lower level comms issue not patient safety.

I hope the J took that one down.

RoamingGnome · 12/02/2025 22:07

Checking shifts in common over Oct to Dec wouldn't be difficult- they would both be on a variety of shift types (nights, days, lates, earlys) so easy to rule out dates they would not have been in ED at the same time. A full time person would have 3 or 4 12 hour shifts in a week, it's not like 9-5 Mon-Fri when everyone is in at the same time.

Presumably Dr U can recall if the resus event was on day or night shift at least.

It doesn't sound like he reported any concerns at the time as he doesn't even know what date it happened on, which presumably means the patient cannot be identified and no one can verify if said patient even existed.

OvaHere · 12/02/2025 22:09

FlowchartRequired · 12/02/2025 22:01

Newspapers have mostly been using the most flattering photos of Dr Upton. I have not been watching the tribunal live, so having more photos from different angles is informative.

Clothes, make-up and earrings do not maketh woman.

Reminds me a bit of a young Lars Ulrich.

I'm not sure this younger generation would have coped with the 70s and 80s. All that gender bending whilst knowing what sex is.

RethinkingLife · 12/02/2025 22:09

KnottyAuty · 12/02/2025 22:03

witness statement - in the bundle

The public doesn't have access to the bundle, if I understand matters correctly?

I've not been able to view any of the proceedings so I don't know if bits are available to those who are watching.

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 12/02/2025 22:11

rebmacesrevda · 12/02/2025 22:03

To be fair to the GMC, they've taken their cue from the GRA, which allows people to change their birth certificates. State-sanctioned rewriting of history.

What was it Orwell wrote about controlling the past....

Surely one of the main reasons that a patient would check this with the GMC is the desire to have a doctor who is e.g. a biological woman

The number of patients who want to know if their doctor falls into the group biological woman + transwomen must be vanishingly small

Igmum · 12/02/2025 22:13

Oh my. £21k already. Well done you wonderful terven

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #15
Brainworm · 12/02/2025 22:13

Thanks @KnottyAuty.

Was KS's statement about the meeting(s) she had with DU relating to his grievances/complaints/concerns?

Did this come out today?

Nameychangington · 12/02/2025 22:14

GailBlancheViola · 12/02/2025 22:06

Glad to hear that people are complaining about Upton he is bringing the entire profession into disrepute with the words that come out of his mouth, his beliefs and his behaviour. He is eroding public trust in the medical profession.

I sincerely hope that medical professionals are also reporting him, it is time they stood up to this, where were they when Sandie Peggie needed them? Where are they now, have they spoken up in support of her to NHS Fife?

First, that he stated under oath that he would attempt to treat a patient who asked for a female doctor, thereby acting without the patient's consent. Which is an assault.

Do doctors and nurses want the public, who fund the NHS, to believe this is what they would do?

The time for quivering, cowardly silence is over.

A lot of doctors on this Reddit are in support of Dr Upton, think that his identity should trump patient choice, and that patients who don't like it should not be treated. Is Dr Upton a bad apple, or is the barrel rotten?

https://www.reddit.com/r/doctorsUK/comments/1inpif2/patient_consent_question_is_dr_upton_correct_in/

NoBinturongsHereMate · 12/02/2025 22:14

Was out today, so am way behind and catching up on thread 14, but dropping this here while I remember re SP being paid while suspended. She will have been, but I suspect just at the basic rate for her grade.

As she seems to have typically/frequently worked nights, which are paid at an enhanced rate, being paid the normal day wage could have meant a significant drop in earnings. Especially as she also won't have been able to do bank or overtime shifts, which a lot of nurses do for extra income.

The day/night difference in pay rates also means she suffered a similar detriment when she was allowed back from suspension, but only on day shift.

And it's not just immediate income affected. Because of the way NHS pensions are calculated, it will also have reduced her pension entitlement.

Hoardasurass · 12/02/2025 22:14

Ok a bit late to this thread was catching up with today hearing and other thread but 😱at KS potentially becoming a named respondent, she must be thinking that's she's got away with it relatively Scott free, I'm sure that tomorrow's x examination will be a harrowing experience for KS especially when she finds out how badly du she's thrown her under the bus and that she could well end up a named defendant 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Signalbox · 12/02/2025 22:15

The GMC must’ve received hundreds of complaints by now. I expect we will all receive identical responses. Something about no evidence of wrongdoing and freedom to identify as whatever he pleases.

If he loses this case they will presumably have to think again but in the meantime NHS Fife and BU will continue to ride roughshod over women’s boundaries.

eulittleb831 · 12/02/2025 22:17

NoBinturongsHereMate · 12/02/2025 22:14

Was out today, so am way behind and catching up on thread 14, but dropping this here while I remember re SP being paid while suspended. She will have been, but I suspect just at the basic rate for her grade.

As she seems to have typically/frequently worked nights, which are paid at an enhanced rate, being paid the normal day wage could have meant a significant drop in earnings. Especially as she also won't have been able to do bank or overtime shifts, which a lot of nurses do for extra income.

The day/night difference in pay rates also means she suffered a similar detriment when she was allowed back from suspension, but only on day shift.

And it's not just immediate income affected. Because of the way NHS pensions are calculated, it will also have reduced her pension entitlement.

What surprised me was that The Telegraph reported SP was working P/T in a different area of the hospital.

KnottyAuty · 12/02/2025 22:17

duc748 · 12/02/2025 21:27

If that was the case, though, it wouldn't be a good look for Sandie either. If that was the case.

I think you should go back and read the TT because you need to look at both descriptions of the same event to decide which is more plausible. You can't possibly do that by getting bits and bobs off this thread. And it is at the heart of the case - who is the more plausible witness? NHS fife sided with DU but it is increasingly looking like they backed the wrong horse

RedToothBrush · 12/02/2025 22:18

Bannedontherun · 12/02/2025 21:46

To add to the resuss discussion he could not enlighten anybody to the date of alleged incident. He said between October and December, in his complaint.

Which meant the investigation could not match the shared shifts and pinpoint date, as too vague.

SP had identified this event in the investigation as Halloween night and it involved a child who ate a snickers and had a reaction.

Upton then claimed that was a separate event, and not the one he was talking about.

I find it impossible to believe that the investigation could not nail down what shifts they were on together throughout the period and what incidences of breathing issues involved either or both of them.

His oral evidence never suggested an actual resuscitation event, seem KS either added that in or it was what he later claimed.

How could KS be sure they were talking about the correct incident when Upton couldn't identify which incident it was because he didn't know the date?

And notably the incident wasn't recorded at the time.

Add to that KS's statement only comes after the fact. That means it could have been led / influenced by what Upton said in retrospect. And in doing so, lead KS about what SP was doing/intention was.

So Upton reminds KS about the incident (after neither reported), after Upton has had a good stew about how it can be framed. Then talks to KS about it with the suggestion of what happened.

Or worse Upton goes 'You're my mate, can you back me up on this because she's being transphobic and you wouldn't want me to be discriminated against now would you?'. And KS agrees to back up over an event that they can't remember which month it occured in...

We know that memory can be unreliable and the fact this incident wasn't recorded when it should have - immediately - precisely to reduce issues with this problem and theres such confusion over the date (thats a big window of time) and the feeling AT THE TIME wasn't to report it EITHER for safety or for hate really is interesting. And deeply problematic.

It makes it he said / she said with little reliability over the situation.Only a retrospective reflection of events which obviously weren't serious enough in ANY respect to merit reporting at the time.

StellaAndCrow · 12/02/2025 22:18

Merrymouse · 12/02/2025 21:16

I don't think it's clear, but we know from Kate Searle's statement that her understanding was that SP "appeared to leave the room and stopped doing resus because Beth entered."

Thank you, yes, that's the only bit I could find too (and only saw it in the Times article).

If that is the impression he gave Dr Searle, it makes me think he gave exaggerated reports to her/the trust investigators/the BMA.

Then when it turned out he'd be going to court, he realised he'd have to provide evidence, so gave more realistic/likely accounts.

There is an argument I guess that by "stopped doing resus" he meant stopped working in the resus room. But crikey if I'd said that, and someone had misinterpreted me to mean that someone had actually stopped in the act of resuscitation, I'd instantly correct them and make very sure that the info was understood and recorded correctly.

Wondering again, did he hope the ambiguity might be helpful i.e. trust/BMA think she has done something terrible and advise accordingly.

Though it's not so helpful when you're giving evidence in court.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 12/02/2025 22:18

Thank you to everyone who has raised this to the GMC. Hoping DS goes to school tomorrow so I can have time to crack the laptop out and get my own complaints drafted and sent.

The safety of patients should come first and foremost and after reading that reddit thread of doctors I've got a fire in my belly that this is something that shouldn't need spelling out but unfortunately we are having to spell it out. BU is not the only doctor who would act without consent however is the only doctor identifiable today which is unfortunate for BU, but even more unfortunate for the patients of doctors across the GMC jurisdiction who have also stated that they disregard patient consent.

KnottyAuty · 12/02/2025 22:20

Signalbox · 12/02/2025 22:15

The GMC must’ve received hundreds of complaints by now. I expect we will all receive identical responses. Something about no evidence of wrongdoing and freedom to identify as whatever he pleases.

If he loses this case they will presumably have to think again but in the meantime NHS Fife and BU will continue to ride roughshod over women’s boundaries.

Maybe the adjournment until July will be helpful. The GMC won't be able to wait - they can access the TT and see the wild stuff GU has said. It is all under oath and unforced testimony - their hand may be forced by the weight of public opinion - we can hope anyway!

RedToothBrush · 12/02/2025 22:20

Signalbox · 12/02/2025 22:15

The GMC must’ve received hundreds of complaints by now. I expect we will all receive identical responses. Something about no evidence of wrongdoing and freedom to identify as whatever he pleases.

If he loses this case they will presumably have to think again but in the meantime NHS Fife and BU will continue to ride roughshod over women’s boundaries.

Identifying however you please, is not the same as a complete on the record denial of biology under oath, whilst working in a field where knowledge of biology is essential to not hurting people in your care.

NotMaroonButRaspberry · 12/02/2025 22:21

NebulousHog · 12/02/2025 20:37

"Upton said that “if we are talking purely about patient safety, someone refusing to communicate in resus is more serious” and rejected Cunningham’s claim that identity “flattens everything”"

So did SP leave resus or refuse to communicate? And if she refused to communicate how did she abruptly ask DU to do obs? Was there more than one resus incident?

I'm confused by this because we only heard about SP not doing the IBS didn't we?

But then the Times article quotes this,

"Dr Kate Searle, Upton’s line manager, said in a statement: “Beth has all the notes including the incident where the other person appeared to leave the room and stopped doing resus because Beth entered. Unfortunately she didn’t raise it at the time.” x

Utterly shocking and I can see why NC was so sure that the allegations could have been "career ending"

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread