Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #15

1000 replies

nauticant · 12/02/2025 15:50

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to continue for 2 weeks although once it was in to the second week it was looking like this would not happen. The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

However, as a result of problems with the livestreaming, apparently, as a result of a very large number of observers, remote public access to the hearing was suspended on Tuesday 11 February. It was suggested that it might be reinstated at some point but don't count on it.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse
Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2
Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3
Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4
Thread 5: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5
Thread 6: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269635-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-6
Thread 7: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5270365-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-7
Thread 8: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271511-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-8
Thread 9: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271596-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-9
Thread 10: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5271723-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-10
Thread 11: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272046-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-11
Thread 12: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272276-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-12
Thread 13: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272398-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-13
Thread 14: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5272939-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-14

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
InvisibleDragon · 12/02/2025 19:51

Mollyollydolly · 12/02/2025 18:28

Would you normally help a colleague submit a datix of an incident you hadn't witnessed. Seems a bit off to a non medical person.

It's not outrageous - Datix is not user friendly and there are fiddly rules about different categories of harm, whether something is a reportable incident etc that a junior doctor might not be expected to know.

If DU had never filled out a Datix before (reasonable assumption), it wouldn't be unusual to fill it in with his supervisor explaining which category to fill in and where to write which details about what happened.

As an example, in a previous role I was doing a Datix every month or so because I worked in a service with lots of incidents of patient aggression. But in my current role I've not done one in over 3 years. It's generally not something that comes up that much.

ChowMoWan · 12/02/2025 19:52

I know it’s petty, but I’m consoling myself by imagining how furious Dr Upton is that Sandie’s fundraiser has far surpassed his own.

Merrymouse · 12/02/2025 19:52

NecessaryScene · 12/02/2025 19:44

But they genuinely do believe that there's sufficient evidence to support that trans people's brains are different and don't match their bodies and therefore some people might genuinely be born in the wrong sex.

The really amazing thing about this phenomenon is it manages to produce female brains in male bodies that act exactly like male brains. All behaviour patterns are statistically male. So weird.

It's just so staggeringly sexist.

You can imagine 19th century male academics trying to work out how Marie Curie and Ada Lovelace had acquired their male brains.

delvan · 12/02/2025 19:52

Merrymouse · 12/02/2025 19:41

"DU: that she would use my refusal to agree with her harassment as a challenge, to organise moves to get me moved from that ward, the department."

This all relies on a belief that SP has a personal vendetta against him because she is transphobic, not a completely reasonable wish to use a single sex changing room per the 1992 regulations. I wonder if either the BMA or NHS Fife ever attempted to reassure him on this point.

But he's not trans, he is a biological female according to him, so how could SP be transphobic.

Llamasarellovely · 12/02/2025 19:53

petesdragfrom · 12/02/2025 19:31

I've not been active on these threads, name change now due to my job. I've been watching here and via the video link until it got fucked by the IT issues/wooly jumper brigade.

Holy fuck what an absolute terrifying mess.

I quit smoking 11 years ago and bought a pack of cigarettes this morning. Absolutely shocking misogynistic content of this case not to mention the incompetence from every participant respondent.

I'm tempted to go full TERF at work after this, I'm sure I'd suffer for it, but how the fuck can this be real.

Come on in, the water's lovely 😁

The first time is scary, the second time is easy, the third time everyone starts agreeing.

InvisibleDragon · 12/02/2025 19:53

Jerabilis · 12/02/2025 18:38

Question for the legal peeps on here. If KS does become Respondent 3 will she be automatically supported by JR or will she have to find / fund her own legal team? What if she doesn't want to be supported by JR?

If I was KS, I would be getting my own lawyer straight away. The NHS is notorious for closing ranks and pinning the blame for systemic failures on individual clinicians.

nauticant · 12/02/2025 19:54

petesdragfrom · 12/02/2025 19:31

I've not been active on these threads, name change now due to my job. I've been watching here and via the video link until it got fucked by the IT issues/wooly jumper brigade.

Holy fuck what an absolute terrifying mess.

I quit smoking 11 years ago and bought a pack of cigarettes this morning. Absolutely shocking misogynistic content of this case not to mention the incompetence from every participant respondent.

I'm tempted to go full TERF at work after this, I'm sure I'd suffer for it, but how the fuck can this be real.

Step
Away
From
The
Fags

Honestly. I'm approaching 15 years without, the craving has all but disappeared in all circumstances, and it is one of the best gifts I've ever given to myself.

OP posts:
AnnaMagnani · 12/02/2025 19:55

One thing I'm hoping to be asked is how the incidents were rated on Datix - both by the reporter and investigator.

The criteria for even grading as Minimal Harm is quite high.

I can't see how any of the incidents rate as anything other than No Harm. Except of course to Dr Upton's hurty feels.

InvisibleDragon · 12/02/2025 19:55

NebulousDog · 12/02/2025 18:42

I didn't understand this bit - DU was asked about the summary sheet and asked to confim that there were more details covered in the full submission. I assume that is in the bundle - does it show DU or KS submitting the datix

@KnottyAuty I think NC's point here was that the Datix had an attachment, which wasn't disclosed in the bundle or the later bundle or even the naughty naughty yesterday bundle.

Dr U said the omission wasn't his fault. He's not good with computer stuff, if you remember.

I might just reinvent myself as naughtynaughtylateBundle for July. Identities can be so transient!

Not totally sure, but I think what happened is that the Datix notification/summary that would have been reviewed by management was included in the bundle, but the original Datix form as completed by DU and KS was not. Oops.

That would also explain why DU wasn't familiar with the format - because he sees the user entry form, not the management summary.

Ineedashero · 12/02/2025 19:56

I'm a bit confused, is KS appearing in July or will it be this month? I'm not sure if NC was just saying 'give us the docs or else' - or if they really will move to July?

NotAComputerPerson · 12/02/2025 19:57

Ineedashero · 12/02/2025 19:56

I'm a bit confused, is KS appearing in July or will it be this month? I'm not sure if NC was just saying 'give us the docs or else' - or if they really will move to July?

July for KS.

WearyAuldWumman · 12/02/2025 19:58

petesdragfrom · 12/02/2025 19:35

I sincerely believe this Dr should not be allowed anywhere near the public let along in the capacity of a medical professional. He's obviously completely insane and a danger to vulnerable people.

I'd have enormous objections to him treating my young or elderly family members.

I've just seen this article. Apparently, some complaints have been made about Upton's failure to understand biology.

www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/trans-dr-beth-uptons-biologically-34659416

Shortshriftandlethal · 12/02/2025 19:58

MarieDeGournay · 12/02/2025 16:22

I'm glad you said that about the judge - I didn't like the previous suggestion that he was biased, not being in the room to hear everything he said, and his manner in saying it. I'd need a lot of first hand evidence before I'd accuse a judge of being biased.

I hadn't even thought about judges having to treat laypeople and lawyers differently, that's a good point, it makes a lot of sense now I think about it.

And as far as open justice is concerned - just because there wasn't remote access did not mean that it was held in secret, so I think it was as open as justice used to be before video links/the internet/etc etc.

For me it is not so much that he was obviously biased as much as he didn't employ firm boundaries or discipline and was inconsistent in his approach throughout. His own time-keeping was also poor.

Ineedashero · 12/02/2025 19:58

in that case, she'll go on sick leave around that time I betcha

KnottyAuty · 12/02/2025 19:58

ThatDaringMintCritic · 12/02/2025 18:27

Not sure it is clear from TT. That's the problem with not having public access. TT does an amazing job but it is hard to follow the details sometimes. I think KS was very unwise to help draft the Datix.

I wondered whether the follow up will come when KS is being asked about it. Was it DU or KS on the datix submission? We would understand why DU would want to fill out the form and it was their experience. But why would KS put her name down? Unless she was asked - why?

They might explore that more. I would be asking about how much pressure KS was under to put her name down (if it is) because once her name is on the datix then it is like 3rd party endorsement. It isn't just DU against SP, its DU + KS senior colleague against SP... and then presumably the rest all fell into line after that. Can't wait to hear her evidence

Bannedontherun · 12/02/2025 19:59

Ineedashero · 12/02/2025 19:58

in that case, she'll go on sick leave around that time I betcha

Or australia

RethinkingLife · 12/02/2025 19:59

AnnaMagnani · 12/02/2025 18:21

@JasmineAllen the hips don't lie.

You can fake a still photo, even better if you can photoshop it but a whole human, in motion, you can tell.

One of my favourite examples (albeit in animation):

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUWBoYwAgaE

KnottyAuty · 12/02/2025 20:01

eatfigs · 12/02/2025 18:55

A wide range of views expressed on the UK Doctors Reddit. Pleased to see some eloquent feminist arguments being made in there.

Thanks!

Great quote from off there - nails it!

[–]Professional-Ear7998 66 points 6 hours ago
Nah this is wild. When a patient says I don't want to have a speculum performed by a male doctor for religious reasons you don't get to define what a man/woman/male/female is to them.
You can believe what you want about what you are and they are free to do the same.
If you think that telling the patient "the truth" will change their mind, you don't have consent.

petesdragfrom · 12/02/2025 20:02

Honestly, in what scenario where a woman might request a female doctor would they be happy with a transwoman doctor.

I can't think of a single scenario.

Unless they were too scared to say no or cause a confrontation. Terrifying.

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 12/02/2025 20:03

petesdragfrom · 12/02/2025 19:36

@rebmacesrevda good point, I could end up needing the care of a doctor who doesn't know what a woman is, what consent it, or what patient care means.

RIP NHS.

And thinks a woman not wanting to change in front of him is an urgent priority but putting a patient at risk isn't. 🫨

Cismyfatarse · 12/02/2025 20:04

The marvelous Massie in excoriating form.

Sturgeon has left Scotland a place where mere words mean nothing

www.thetimes.com/article/b73c5e6f-639b-4cb3-bb50-6e9e47ac68d7?shareToken=ee6a25406dab129e58e89de23a5c4318

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 12/02/2025 20:04

delvan · 12/02/2025 16:16

Is SP still suspended, and if so, will she remain so until the judgment (in about a year's time)?

If she's still suspended it's going to be quite a challenge to return to work after such a long time out.

ScribblingPixie · 12/02/2025 20:05

I really, really hope that not many of the people posting on that Reddit thread are not actually doctors. My confidence in the NHS just dropped several thousand miles.

yourhairiswinterfire · 12/02/2025 20:05

Does this dickhead use an identifiable name? Given this would be in breech of social media use and bringing the profession into disrepute under NHS policy / GMC policy....

Unfortunately not, Red.

Saveusernsme · 12/02/2025 20:06

eatfigs · 12/02/2025 18:55

A wide range of views expressed on the UK Doctors Reddit. Pleased to see some eloquent feminist arguments being made in there.

It’s concerning the volume in support of Dr Upton and seemingly thinking they have access to patients by stealth. The number of apparent Drs on there agreeing is worrying.

If I ask for a female Dr then I want a female Dr. I would not expect to have a man address me to so that I may see if he passes as a woman.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread